this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
94 points (99.0% liked)

Privacy

2323 readers
320 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube secretly used artificial intelligence to modify creators' videos without notification or consent, making subtle changes to their appearance[^1]. According to Rick Beato, who runs a YouTube channel with over 5 million subscribers, he noticed strange alterations in his videos - his hair looked different and it appeared he was wearing makeup[^1].

The AI modifications included sharpening skin in some areas while smoothing it in others, defining wrinkles in clothing more clearly, and causing subtle warping of features like ears[^1]. YouTuber Rhett Shull, who investigated the changes, said "If I wanted this terrible over-sharpening I would have done it myself... I think that deeply misrepresents me and what I do and my voice on the internet"[^1].

The unauthorized AI enhancements represent a concerning trend where artificial intelligence increasingly mediates reality before it reaches viewers, potentially eroding authentic connections between creators and their audiences[^1].

[^1]: BBC - YouTube secretly used AI to edit people's videos. The results could bend reality

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Who the fuck is asking for things like this? Is it really too much to ask for, at the very least, users to make these choices themselves in settings rather than everyone getting this crap ~~passed~~ forced down from the corporate level?

[–] SlykeThePhoxenix@programming.dev 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, you don't know what's for your own good.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SlykeThePhoxenix@programming.dev 1 points 21 hours ago

Trust the corporations. They obviously know what's best.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who the fuck is asking for things like this?

Middle-managers trying to justify their terrible decisions

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 13 points 1 day ago

More like C-Level managers pushing the engineers to use AI in ways nobody wants, including a lot of the engineers, for the sake of propping up a AI bubble to keep driving investment in trash technology.

[–] ignirtoq@fedia.io 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yet some disturbed YouTubers say it gives their content a subtle and unwelcome AI-generated feeling.

I wonder if this is an attempt at smoothing out the differences between authentic video and AI-generated video from the other side. Secretly pass authentic videos through an AI filter not to improve them in any way, but to give them AI-generated characteristics. Then when purely AI-generated videos start to show up side-by-side on the platform, it becomes harder to differentiate from human-created content.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 20 hours ago

Evil execs: "This is the way"

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Imagine using a YouTube video of some event to submit as evidence in court and it gets thrown out for being changed by AI.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The smoothing effect is just compression artifacts.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 20 hours ago

2021: jpeg
2023: jpeg-xl
2025: jpeg-ai