this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
379 points (99.2% liked)

politics

25420 readers
3090 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Guy in military clothing with an American flag on his shoulder burns an American flag in front of the white house while being filmed by bystanders.

Guy gets detained

Apparently the EO declares burning flags in protest to be "incitement to riot"

source: https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1n06xgy/detained_for_burning_the_american_flag/

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

any update on this? they let this guy go? If they do charge him with something, I'd love to see how that court case goes.

edit: well, i googled it. Apparently he was released after 4 hours and they charged him with "lighting a fire in a park".

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Well he sorta did do that so….

[–] Aimeeloulm@feddit.uk 2 points 14 hours ago

Maybe he prefers to warm up his flags before eating them, I'm sure Zoidberg would agree 👍

[–] Hellsfire29@lemmy.world -3 points 14 hours ago

I'm going to do the same thing, but with a pride flag.

[–] RinseChessBacked@lemmy.ml 136 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There shouldn't be any penalties for burning any flags of any kind. Freedom of speech is more important than any symbol.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I guess if you burn the flag and then throw it into an animal shelter and it burns down and kills all the dogs then that should be illegal.

Yah, you're supposed to shoot the puppies, not burn them. -DHS, probably

Burning the flag should be allowed as long as wiping your ass with the Constitution is allowed.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

100% this. If I bought the flag and I want to burn it. Then fuck anyone who says otherwise. It's my property.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

B-b-but think of the PATRIOTS!!!!! They don't want their feewings hurt by you burning a piece of fabric with the shapes they like way, way too much, is it too much to ask??/??//?? /s

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep exactly. All of my coworkers are hardcore conservatives and Trump dick riders. Until the Epstein cover up started most of then completely stopped taking politics some even took down their Trump flags, that was until Trump called for the national guard to “take over” the streets of DC. Now they are all back on board with it saying it time to go to war with America to save America. Now with this flag burning shit they are so excited to hopefully beat the shit outa someone burning the flag to appease dear sweet leader Donny. Hey America are tired yet of all this winning?

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Ouroboros of cognitive dissonance

[–] pezhore@infosec.pub 98 points 2 days ago (4 children)

He should have respected the flag, like making it black and white except one of the strips is blue. Or by putting it on an article of clothing like underwear so the flag can literally go up your butt. You know, "respect".

/s

[–] Brujones@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

Or putting it on the back of your truck, where it will get covered in road grime, but you won't care because you're a 'patriot'.

Also /s, of course.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

like making it black and white except one of the strips is blue

My favorite sticker is that "thin blue balls" flag but the blue stripe is peeling off to reveal the Nazi flag underneath. I wish I had the balls to put it on my car but I absolutely do not.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 16 points 2 days ago

Our maybe beating a police officer with the pole it's mounted to

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

My MAGA relative has an American flag bath towel. Nothing says "patriotism" like doing the butt-floss with Ol' Glory!

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Within the last day or so -

Burning the flag, renaming DOD to Dept. of War, trying again to deport Kilmar Abrego, signaling they’re going to ban the COVID-19 vaccine, and attempting to sue California to prevent their redistricting while allowing Texas’ to proceed.

Is this more of the gish-gallop that Bannon described that they’re pulling to overwhelm the news cycle so that a few of the bullshit things they’re pulling don’t get overturned, or are they specifically looking to push out some stories, like Trump’s obvious failing health, Epstein-related stories (inclusive of the latest on Gislaine), or possibly the redistricting one above.

Ugh. They’re up to more bullshit than usual, but the signal to noise ratio makes it hard to discern what.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You left out the online vigilante portal.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

The what?

Edit: What the fuck?

[–] BiCow@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Executive order from Monday "The D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force established in Executive Order 14252 of March 27, 2025 (Making the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful), shall establish an online portal for Americans with law enforcement or other relevant backgrounds and experience to apply to join Federal law enforcement entities to support the policy goals described in Executive Order 14333." Executive order

Or the Rockland NY and other election lawsuits...

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is well-established law. A decision made by SCOTUS.

Texas v. Johnson

Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech.

So this is absolutely pathetic of the Trump administration. These charges have no chance of sticking. It's just authoritarian bullying.

[–] Aquaphobi@lemmy.zip 45 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You know what else was well established law? I’ll wait.

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

Pretty much everything prior to this partisan Supreme Court. This new court just says “fuck it” and does what it wants.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

Lots of things that used to be called crimes against humanity but are now just another tuesday?

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That little document that makes all the rules?

[–] Aquaphobi@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Instructions unclear, the constitution is now a docker compose file

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 69 points 2 days ago

“How dare you exercise a constitutionally protected, right!“

– Trump, right before he deports this person, their entire family, and anyone who ever knew them

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Isn’t proper flag code to burn an American flag to retire it after it’s become tattered enough not to be a symbol of the US anymore?

[–] Laser@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago

The whole thing is super dumb, as you said, burning the flag is the proper way to get rid of one no longer for for display (imagine the flag hanging out of a bin or something).

You know what's also against the flag code? Plastering it everywhere that's not a flag, like towels or whatever. But the flag code is only binding for government bodies if I'm not mistaken.

But yeah, the whole thing is just stupid.

[–] memfree@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

Yes. Under section 176, we see this -- emphasis mine:

(i) The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever. It should not be embroidered on such articles as cushions or handkerchiefs and the like, printed or otherwise impressed on paper napkins or boxes or anything that is designed for temporary use and discard. Advertising signs should not be fastened to a staff or halyard from which the flag is flown.

(j) No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform. However, a flag patch may be affixed to the uniform of military personnel, firemen, policemen, and members of patriotic organizations. The flag represents a living country and is itself considered a living thing. Therefore, the lapel flag pin being a replica, should be worn on the left lapel near the heart.

(k) The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Inciting a riot? I dont think Trump is on any leg to make that accusation

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Oh it doesn't matter. None of this matters. The rules, the courts, the white house. It's all bullshit.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Burning the US flag is like the one thing everyone, all over the world, agrees is great, why do you have to be weird

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Didn't we already have a supreme court case about this? Oh, right, we did. The arrogance of an executive order imposing intent of speech is just one more line of idiocy in the annals of this period.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that happened around the same time that the supreme Court agreed that abortion was a human right as well.

It would be crazy if they were to later contradict themselves.

It would be even crazier if we didn't all arm ourselves, practice and prepare for the worst knowing damn well that we could easily outsmart people that are dumb enough to support fascism on a battlefield that is inevitably coming our way.

[–] memfree@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago

I'm reminded of this bit on just wearing the flag

“You’re not going to get arrested for being in violation of the flag code. There’s no flag police,” Leepson says.

Later, the Supreme Court said 1974 that flag wearing was free speech, and in 1989 that flag burning was also free speech.

Ahhh.... simpler times.

[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

If I see someone burning a flag, is it okay to pee on it to put it out?

Desperation is a stinky cologne John

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

We should all be joining him.. They going arrest millions of us? We neee to treat this like the No Kings Day. This shit is beyond unconstitutional. I wonder if Trump is trying to get that overturned? Womder what his SCOTUS will do with this one?

So much for respecting the flag code

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

Link to article?