this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
586 points (99.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63843 readers
632 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Google can get fucked. I feel like there will be a nontrivial market for de-googled or older and unlocked Android phones after this. If they manage to kill off custom roms with their previous AOSP rug pull I'll go back to using a (subpar) Linux phone or maybe even one of those cheap flip phones.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] melimosa@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 days ago

My phone is not an airport. It's a garbage collection machine found in a trash, with a battery so it looks portable. I don't need an ID to use it, nobody will ever need.

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

any good replacement phone OSes out there?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Twoafros@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

fuck google!

Who can I donate to that is working on making alternative OS accessible on android or iphones?

I know there are alternative OS already out there but they aren't as universally accessible compared to how Linux can run on any PC.

[–] anon5621@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Problem is we need vendor like pinephone maybe fairphone,which will able to run give us freedom what to run on device hunting and seeking for vendor which allowing to unlock bootloader and then install custom os it sleepery slope because it's not know how longer they will let to do it

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

How about we abandon proprietary locked-down launcher sandboxes on our phones and just run regular old Linux on them like we do on the desktop?

Isn't that what PostmarketOS is? Is there some bullshit firmware issue in the way of that? What exactly is stopping us?

[–] drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The difference is that mobile phone hardware is commonly more locked down by default than x86 hardware. Whatever phone you have now likely has some weird shit on it that makes it really difficult to do anything but what the manufacturer wants you to do. What Microsoft is trying to do with Win11 and TPM 2.0, has basically already been done with many brands of smartphone. I've been trying to research affordable smartphones to daily drive that are also de-googled, and hours of research has resulted in me struggling to use a pinephone. The hardware, the software, they're just not there, either. It's not like desktop Linux where really it's better than Windows if you give it a chance. Mobile FOSS OSes might be daily drivable if you try really hard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cochise@lemmy.eco.br 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Any developer of piracy or emulation related software will not apply for the registration, because the trail will point to they official identity, opening a flank to legal actions. This will kill piracy in Android.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 30 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Looks like I'm gonna just carry a stock phone, give it nothing but the most basic information and tether it to a laptop over a VPN. They stop tethering? I'll use VOIP and a hotspot.

Welcome back to 2011. Maybe messenger bags will come back into fashion in foss culture.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] xcjs@programming.dev 15 points 2 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 14 points 2 days ago

This is complete BS

[–] sk1nnym1ke@piefed.social 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What does this mean for F-Droid?

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 23 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Every developer wishing to offer applications on F-Droid will have to register their identities and package names to Google for Android devices to install their apps, regardless of the distribution platform (F-Droid, Obtainium, GitHub releases, etc.)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 days ago (8 children)

So looks like graphene is the future. Away from android and iOS. Any other alternatives OS and phone to look at?

[–] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Isn't graphene having a challenging future because they have vendor locked themselves into pixel phones and said vendor is pulling the rug by not providing drivers going forward?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

lineageos does support far more phone vendors; who knows what pixel phones will be like in the future

I'm hoping on fairphone to get graphene support 🤷

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 15 points 2 days ago (5 children)

That's a sure way to get me off of your OS. FAFO I've already dropped M$ products.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 01011@monero.town 23 points 3 days ago

2026 year of the Linux phone?

[–] ReedReads@lemmy.zip 25 points 3 days ago (9 children)

If you’re technical enough to sideload Android apps, you’re probably technical enough to install Graphene too.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 54 points 3 days ago (8 children)

*if you have a Pixel device (that aren't that great, actually).

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 days ago (4 children)

If google is gonna ban sideloading, surely they will lock their bootloaders first.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If Android sideloading needs to be verified by googld for "Security" then Maybe IOS seems like a viable option (except for the price and price to repair) but man i wish Linux on smartphones Has a good ecosystem of apps.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

iOS is still worse, because you're then confined to whatever is in the App Store, which Apple take a 30% cut of.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And in one fell swoop, Google just took a baseball bat to its own kneecaps.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›