52
Humorous they think Republicans would vote for a woman to lead them considering they don't see women as having any capacities beyond being birth and baby raising machines that cook, clean and generally maintain the home for a man.
Haley, I think, has the best chance to win in the primaries, after Trump. She appears to be the most moderate, attracting the vanishing number of moderate Republicans, but she still has that authoritarian bent their base of fascists love.
It's still going to be a long shot either way, but this next election cycle is probably going to be a wild one.
Nikki Haley has devolved into Koch Pawn.
I am surprised that her talking points earned her that nomination, they must be super desperate.
If her talking points become more moderate, she could become a contender for Biden. Good thing that won't happen.
Her recent campaign speech in South Carolina was a good one, imho. Her target audience and Biden's has considerable overlap.
It won't matter when she loses the nomination. She'll probably be his VP though and then it's a real shit show.
Bags the Koch
Koch suckers stick together
It’s Biden vs the traitor trump.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
But her headline-grabbing TV debate performances and a recent favourability bump in early-voting states, as a once-crowded Republican field begins to thin out, have given hope to those who want an alternative to Mr Trump.
In recent weeks, several high-profile donors have indicated they will back her over Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who is polling in second place but whose campaign appears to be faltering.
It added that internal polling and voter outreach shows Mrs Haley performing best in a hypothetical general election match-up with Joe Biden, the Democrats' current likely 2024 nominee.
Spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement on Tuesday that no amount of "shady money" would help Mrs Haley defeat Mr Trump.
In its Tuesday memo, AFP Action apologised to DeSantis supporters but warned that a divided primary field would only benefit Mr Trump and "we are entering a time period that demands choices".
During the Trump years, it scored several major policy victories, including on tax reform, but opposed his stance on government spending and trade issues.
The original article contains 656 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
She could be the first Indian and first girl President
I’d bet the mortgage she’s inviable.
I know nothing about her uterus
No that’s infertile, inviable is when no one can see you.
No that's invisible, inviable is when something can't be divided
John Cena?
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
52 points (96.4% liked)
politics
19096 readers
3227 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS