this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
164 points (98.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41897 readers
959 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

MD5? SHA1? We increase security by not telling you.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 2 points 8 hours ago

Love KDE's Dolphin. In the file properties you can just paste a hash and it will check the correct one for you.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.europe.pub 49 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe it's the same for all checksums? They should get a prize if they did that.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

The grand unified file.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 30 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's not that uncommon because they have specific lengths, so usually just by the length you can know the checksum. Of course it's not perfect, but for file verification it's usually MD5, SHA1, or SHA256, so the length is enough to differentiate between them.

But yeah, dick move.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 19 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

It’s the first time I’ve seen it. Are we supposed to memorize the specific length of each hashing function now?

[–] Tenkard@lemmy.ml 4 points 12 hours ago

I'd just run the cli commands to check it

md5 filename sha256 filename

Etc.

As the other user said it should be one of the main ones

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Cyberchef is your friend

https://cyberchef.io/

Uss the magic module or "analyze hash"

[–] some_random_nick@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago

A solution to a problem that shouldn't even exist

[–] somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

UBUNTU 20??!!!

That's ancient. Not even LTS anymore.

What on earth are you downloading that needs this old software?

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 16 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

It’s Audacity’s AppImage. The Mint repos are terribly outdated.

[–] toffi@piefed.social 7 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Isn't the unofficial successor tenacity since audacity partly switched to a closed/proprietary license?

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not the license. It’s the opt-in telemetry. I’m not sure if this is prepackaged binary or not. Either way, that’s why people switched

[–] Lodra@programming.dev 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I absolutely understand not liking opt-out telemetry. Do people generally not like opt-in telemetry? Is this really why the community shifted to a different project?

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 7 points 17 hours ago

Given that they were planning to implement Yandex telemetry, I’m guessing the answer is yes. Plus they decided to age “limit” to 13+ to support these changes.

If I could recall anything I ate today, I’d tell you what else I remember about audacity back then. As it stands, I can’t. So, sorry about that

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 8 points 19 hours ago

Audacity is released under the GNU General Public License version 3 (GPLv3).

https://github.com/audacity/audacity/blob/master/LICENSE.txt

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 1 points 19 hours ago

AFAIK the "issues" with Audacity were only that they added optional telemetry, and made the project lead a former Microsoft guy.

I may be wrong, I avoid looking too much into this type of drama.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Just out of curiosity: what do you need that the newer versions have but the version on Mint is missing?

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago

The volume meter is cut off on my old version. I assume that Audacity reads the dimensions of my internal screen (2560px) instead of the one I’m actually using (1920px) when computing the width of the meter.

[–] frankenswine@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

guix shell audacity -- audacity

to just use

guix install audacity

to install it

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of you to assume I have your favorite package manager installed

[–] frankenswine@lemmy.world -2 points 17 hours ago

it is a solution to your problem whether you like it or not

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Try using audacity flatpak

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The audacity website didn’t mention Flatpak, so I thought they didn’t support it. However…

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 18 hours ago

It's a good try though, if it doesn't work for you uninstall it.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago

Just install McAfee AND Nortons antivirus and everything will be fine

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Dev must've thought the name meant a user was supposed to check some algorithms until they find a match.

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

not enough digits for md5, could be sha1 yes

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

Just did a test of the character counts for different algorithms, here's the number of characters for each:

Command Characters
md5sum 32
sha1sum 40
sha256sum 64
[–] Sxan@piefed.zip -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You're supposed to find out by trial and error. Ubuntu is gamifying security.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This has literally nothing to do with Ubuntu.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 0 points 12 hours ago

You're right! Consequently, þe joke is even less funny.