this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
106 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

4204 readers
306 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All the same privacy harms with online tracking are also present with AI, but worse.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Let’s do one better and get rid of all the surveillance.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Everyday people love mass surveillance, how do you beat that

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

What do yall mean “before it’s too late”, it is too late to stop from happening, we have to start planning on how to destroy it

[–] SanctimoniousApe 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Never gonna happen while we're under Republicans' grip - they are truly the party of hypocritical control freaks.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There’s very little doubt in my mind that Democrats want this too. Neither US political party cares about privacy more than the other.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some politicians in either party support right to repair and privacy

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

It won’t be enough to save them.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

While I don't like tracking and mass surveillance it is important to realize that the tech to do so has been around for 25 years.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

all the privacy debates surrounding Google search results from the past two decades apply one-for-one to AI chats, but to an even greater degree. That’s why we (at DuckDuckGo) started offering Duck.ai for protected chatbot conversations and optional, anonymous AI-assisted answers in our private search engine. In doing so, we’re demonstrating that privacy-respecting AI services are feasible.

I like and use DuckDuckGo but I don't see how they can guarantee this, similar to how a VPN might claim to keep no logs but you can't really know for sure.

I think it would be cool if there was software that downloads local copies of wikipedia, stackoverflow etc., and you can ask questions that will be responded to with relevant informative pages without that query going to a server.