160

A neo-Nazi front group is demanding that New England secede and establish itself as a white nation. Decrying “enemies” that are “all around us” and vowing to defend racial “integrity,” the People’s Initiative of New England published a revolutionary manifesto on July 27 advocating “separation from the United States of America.”

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

It’s sad the times we’re living through. When I was growing up and getting smarter in school, I expected the rest of the world was too.

Yet, its 2023 and we still have Nazi’s out there thinking it’s okay to hate and people who think the world is flat.

[-] hamandjam@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Also thinking that somehow the NE states could be self-sustaining. Exactly what cureency would this country use? How would they feed their citizens? Do they think that population could survive on just cranberries and maple syrup? Would they expect to be allowed to stay on the electrical grid without paying for the infrastructure upkeep? Do they have refineries to process crude into useable fuels?

As usual, those who dont know history are doomed to repeat it and these dools obviously slept through history class and disnt pay attention to why the CSA was dooned to fall.

[-] KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

There are countries that import things which they cannot produce domestically. Though not sure who would want to do business with such a country. Actually sadly probably a lot of US states would want to. Not like this would ever happen though lol.

[-] Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

That was a lot of words, to say absolutely nothing. Are you a politician?

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

We probably outnumber these pussy bitches by 20 to 1. If it ever comes to blows.

[-] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I like the cut of your jib!

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

And thats assuming you fight them fairly, I personally dont believe in fighting anyone but my kith and kin fairly.

[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

we just call that the luck of the Irish

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

In New England of all places. Morons.

Never been in backwoods Maine, huh.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Just saying there are a lot of other regions in the US that would be more fertile ground for this type of endeavor.

Well if they were rational, they wouldn't be racists, but there is certainly a fixation on New England among certain groups. It's not very common but this isn't the first time this idea has been floated, like the inbred cousin of the idea of the Great White North, which means "snowy" to some and something else to a certain sort.

[-] buttsbuttsbutts@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago

I'd guess they chose the area because of the relatively low population. They figure they can outnumber the locals like the libertarians have been trying to do in New Hampshire.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Outnumbered by a bunch of liberals

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Get ready for russia funding bullshit like this in the lead-up to the election. Fucking useful idiots.

[-] hawx@infosec.pub 17 points 1 year ago

Lmao trying that in New England is wild.

[-] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago
[-] orclev@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Honestly I kind of like the idea of these nutjobs all congregating in one place, and it sounds like they're even volunteering to bow out of US politics. I can't help but view this as an absolute win. If all the sane people also move out of that area we can maybe even take a page from the racists own playbook and just build a wall around them.

[-] sighchedelic@artemis.camp 4 points 1 year ago

This sounds a lot like the State of Jefferson, which was/is supposed to be mad made up of southern Oregon and northern California. They've been talking about that idea since the early 1900's

[-] teft@startrek.website 15 points 1 year ago

New England is mostly white not because they’re racist, it’s because they didn’t have slaves. These idiots are going to find out about the 20th Maine if they want to see how New Englanders treat racists.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes and no… New England did have sundown towns and exclusionary zoning.

I do agree that the region is outwardly more liberal and progressive, but my feeling is also that it’s values haven’t been tested as much as other areas. In the past when it’s values were tested, it hasn’t always been perfect. I say this as a New Englander. That said, it’s worlds away from a place like the South. And, I do appreciate the values of the area even if they aren’t always consistently upheld. It is better than unapologetic and outward racism.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Idaho is leaking.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, the free stater scum that flocked here in the early 2000s. These losers came mostly from the south and are slowly getting priced out of the area due to high property taxes (we have no state income tax, so property taxes are quite high).

These morons also seem to think that the US would just let it happen, and be open to trade with them.

[-] RavenFellBlade@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

New Hampshire, I presume? I had to move to the midwest on account of those ever increasingly absurd property takes because "all of the tourists will go somewhere else if we have a sales tax!" Such nonsense. When I left, there were more Massholes living in the NH seacoast than local folk. Buncha dubbas.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

I mean, yeah, that's pretty much what they do, isn't it?

[-] Sunroc@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Fun fact, the symbol on their flag is sold on Etsy and Amazon Handmade! Artisanal hate paraphernalia!

[-] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Lol the fucking hate pizza? 😆

[-] Sunroc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's called a Sonnenrad, Google sonnenrad jewelry to see all the businesses profiting from hate symbols!

[-] autotldr 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Decrying “enemies” that are “all around us” and vowing to defend racial “integrity,” the People’s Initiative of New England published a revolutionary manifesto on July 27 advocating “separation from the United States of America.”

The initiative, he insists, seeks to “blackpill” Americans who’ve bought into “Tucker Carlson and the ‘great replacement’ conspiracy theory” and move them down the “pipeline” to full-fledged fascism.

“The only way you achieve a white ethnostate is the forced removal of, or mass killings of, people of color, right?” PINE is “using synonyms,” Goldsmith believes, “but still seeking to accomplish the same ethnic-cleansing goals of the neo-Nazi version of their brand.”

But NSC-131’s own literature, announcing the launch of PINE, explained the relationship between the two groups: “The Nationalist Social Club was conceived and implemented as the vanguard of our people,” reads a Telegram post from April.

NSC-131 has also recently amped up its public relations — seemingly in response to the dossier distributed by Task Force Butler that labeled them “a violent terrorist gang” that engages in “harassment against religious, racial, and ethnic minorities, the LGBTQIA+ community, and others deemed ‘enemies.’”

The group also insists: “We reject any and all false assertions that we are in any way a gang, criminal enterprise, or terrorist group.” (It also denigrates Task Force Butler founder Goldsmith as “Goldbrick,” blasting him as “a Jew who engages in deception for a living.”)


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
160 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3810 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS