this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

2379 readers
27 users here now

Post articles or questions about technology

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dotslashme@infosec.pub 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We’ve looked at how our teams work best, and the data is clear: when people work together in person more often, they thrive

Yeah, I call bullshit. Show me the raw data and let's see what it actually says.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 2 points 7 hours ago

This is true when you company is heavily disorganized and people have to go see each other face to face to go around ineffective people or services. This is a clear sign that Microsoft is highly disorganized and on the track to be more and more inefficient. And if people can't take a break of the chaos by working remote they can't do task which require not to be perturbed for hours. Investisors should avoid this company, it has no long terme view.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a person that has done WFH since 2010, I can confirm two things: 1) Working alone is 150% more efficient than office. 2) Trainees or Projects that have group collaboration thrive better with intraoffice contact. There is no remote tool that captures the performance boost you get from direct in person collaboration.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also, Microsoft just sent a message to everyone the MS Teams is not good. Lol.

[–] slate@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Oh, good. Everyone was very on the fence about how good Teams was before, it's nice to finally have a definitive answer.

[–] glorious_goldfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So ironic given they produce the worlds premier remote workplace communication tool…

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

They own WebEx?

[–] partner_boat_slug@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Microsoft Teams?

[–] Zomg@piefed.world 4 points 1 day ago

I guess this is one way to keep North Koreans from getting employment through remote jobs...?

[–] partner_boat_slug@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Microservs get called back to office.

[–] Ascrod@midwest.social 0 points 23 hours ago

They're asking for 3 days per week but not the full 5. This is pretty in line with the "new normal" compromises that most businesses are asking of knowledge workers these days.

In my opinion/experience, in-person group collaboration can be very helpful, so I can see the argument for it. But, I think it should flexible and not be required by an arbirary number of in-person days. Maybe 1 regular day per week at minimum. Maybe.

I'm in office 3 days a week and honestly most of the time it's a waste of my commute time because my teams are remote anyway. My work does provide incentives to come in on occasion (periodic lunches for example) which is nice if I can/want to make it.