this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
278 points (93.2% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1992 readers
1023 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post, rather than engaging in unrelated arguments.

Brigading — If you're here because this community was linked in another thread, please refrain from voting, commenting or manipulating the post in any way, this includes alt accounts. All votes are public, and if you are found to be brigading, you will be permanently banned.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the Lemmy.ml instance!

And consider donating to individual instances instead.

Check the megathread for more!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 5 days ago

Are there reasons to criticize the BBC? Yes. For example, their whole Devil's advocate/false balance approach to reporting. Everything has a "matter-of-fact" feel to it that even if what reporting is factually true, it lacks the nuance and complexities of the issue at hand.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 48 points 6 days ago (16 children)

Dessaline did not understand the difference between "credible" and "biased". Which is why he often confused between the two.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If this was about actual critisism of the BBC and them not living up to actual journalistic standards, then i could agree with this.

But we know its not, its because they disagree with his picture of reality. So a shitty chinese propagabda source with blatantly lower journalistic standards would be seen as a legitimate source, simply for being anti-west or pro China.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

This is the issue. They never give actual criticism of the reporting or the reporters or go into any depth on the bias. By being an English language outlet not based in Russia/China they are, ipso facto, a lying tabloid rag. It's an absurd cyclical logic.

[–] Estiar@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 days ago

They have a lot of bias against migrants and trans people. They have this both-sides-ism where they give opposing sides equal validity even when one is quite loony. The result? Incredible surges in transphobic politics and TERFism and xenophobic rhetoric and the rise of the far right under Nigel Farage. Sometimes foreign news tends to be of a better quality than domestic, but they are plagued with the same issues as other news sources. Funding cuts are something else they deal with as despite their slow move to a nationalist perspective, the Government still questions their purpose, and so they often try to appease those groups.

There's a lot to criticize about the BBC

[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 23 points 6 days ago

This is probably the least controversial thing dessalines has said.

The average thing the BBC posts may not be outright lies but I wouldn’t go as far as calling them credible.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 28 points 6 days ago

Of course it isn't, have you seen the crap they write about Gaza?

Sad to see how they've fallen. They were considered the gold standard of journalism.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why does it seem like tankies repeat talking points ad verbatim? If I have a penny every time I hear BBC for being biased and unreliable, I would have already retired. What do they think of RT or any Chinese media? I always say that these terminally online tankies are extremely sad people who are only larping as communists to feel a sense of belonging in a group. They're literally just a gang doing things just for the fun of it.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago (11 children)

From what I understand, Tankies are okay with RT and Chinese state media.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] sobchak@programming.dev 9 points 5 days ago

I mean, they're literally state media. They're ok on some subjects, but do have various biases.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 days ago

get back to work dessalines

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

News is - and always has been - unreliable. Complex topics condensed to digestible, engaging narratives. Biases both overt and subconscious always creep in, even if it’s a subtle choice of words. Important data, context, and facts are always missed. Opinions find their way in and op-eds further confuse issues.

There is no single source of news that can be trusted and even if you dig deep you can never know how much you really know, how much you really missed, or how compromised you’ve been by all the subtle biases in writing style and coverage.

Take everything you read anywhere with copious amounts of salt and suspicion.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Aussiemandeus

Amazing username or best username?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago

Some people have a lot of trouble existing in an environment unless they are "the ones in charge" who can dictate to everyone what's going on and what's allowed and not. They can just issue orders, and people can obey or suffer the consequences.

People who are trying to lead (and garner respect and support for their decisions and the reasons behind them) just react totally differently and talk to people totally differently than this.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 8 points 6 days ago (6 children)

What does "orientalist" even mean

[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 14 points 6 days ago

I don’t know what he meant by it, but orientalism is the tendency of western authors, audiences, etc. to conflate many different eastern cultures. It usually stems from a lack of familiarity with any particular culture, and a very shallow knowledge and understanding thereof. An example could be using Mongolian designs in a Persian setting.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 10 points 6 days ago

Why is this guy shitposting instead of writing the code he's paid to write? Seems like a grift

load more comments
view more: next ›