this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
253 points (97.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

6803 readers
39 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Blum0108@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nuh uh, I can totally see the Rockies from my front yard in Minnesota.

[–] Bonus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Continental US Elevation

[–] Siethron@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Heh Ozrark "mountains"

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This is a weird presentation. Was someone trying to make a minecraft mod or something?

[–] three@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

True, there should be a standard for artists to keep them in line and stop them from being creative.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

Lol, this is just inaccurate as an elevation map

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is dataisbeautiful, not randomstuffisbeautiful.

[–] three@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This map could have been beautiful but to me, it's way too cluttered and the shadows are too strong making it hard to see the "data" unless you really zoom in.

It would be cool if this was an interactive site where you could rotate the camera.

[–] three@lemmy.zip -1 points 4 days ago

Took you a whole day, but you finally made a worthwhile comment 👍

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More like someone didn't want to go through the extra work of smoothing things out.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's interesting that it is smooth specifically in the x direction, but the y direction has more abrupt changes.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

what do you mean? it's clearly made up of square pillars, and thus only "smooth" in the upwards direction

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

We probably don't have data for elevation at the resolution needed to generate a smooth mesh rather than towers. You could artificially smooth it out but that would be a less honest representation of the data.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

We have data at 5m resolution for free, or better. Source: am geoscientist

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

You also have to consider computational resources for rendering it. The more detail you include, the more expensive it is.

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 2 points 6 days ago

As @HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com says, touch some grass

Now for the minecraft part, you might enjoy Terralith