Seeing that from outside the USA it's completely baffling that judges need to declare the party they root for (what if they vote for an independent candidate? 🤔) and that it's expected of them to show personal bias in their ruling instead of... You know... Acting like judges that are there to impartially apply the rule of law?

It couldn’t happen to a shittier person.

He's repeatedly shown that he's willing to throw even close allies under the bus, not even for cause, but just to distract or get himself back in the news. Even if he put you in office and/or you've supported him in the past, he's made it increasingly clear to judges and everyone else that it's not worth tying their career and livelihood to protecting him. His well poisoning is not just ridiculously public; his toxic behavior has become impossible to ignore even to the most self serving and delusional of would be allies.

They've been ruling against him from the beginning. I'm always puzzled that people seem to think the judges are his allies or owe him anything. Once they're on the bench he has zero power over them.

Yet somehow (according to him) it’s always Biden and Dem appointed judges that are doing hit jobs and unfair rulings.

He worked really hard to behave so egregiously and unjustifiably that even his appointed cronies won't tie themselves to his sinking ship.

They were never “his” Judges, at least not in the way that hysterical online media wanted people to believe.

Trump just thinks he knows everything. He figured if he appointed his own picks, he'll never be held accountable. The problem is that since he loves indulging in second bowls of his own shit and sniffing the farts that come with them. He didn't think that the people he appointed, are functioning on their own while playing up to allying with him.

And so judge after judge and associate work against him and he has the biggest pikachu shocked face of them all.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

A federal appeals court on Friday rejected Trump's efforts to claim presidential immunity from civil lawsuits against him for his alleged role in the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, at least for now.

"The sole issue before us is whether President Trump has demonstrated an entitlement to official-act immunity for his actions leading up to and on January 6 as alleged in the complaints," the three-judge panel wrote in a 3-0 ruling.

In July, Trump lost the $475 million defamation lawsuit he brought against CNN after Judge Raag Singhal, who was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Trump in 2019, ruled that the use of the phrase "the Big Lie" was opinion and not factual, thus failing to meet the standard for defamation.

Trump was also shut down by some of his own appointees in December 2022, when a federal appeals court in Florida overturned a decision that blocked the Justice Department from using the documents discovered during the Mar-a-Lago raid.

"In any event, at least for these purposes, the declassification argument is a red herring because declassifying an official document would not change its content or render it personal."

"The immunity question thus turns on whether President Trump made the January 6 speech in an official or private capacity," Katsas wrote.

The original article contains 521 words, the summary contains 222 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

Good.