this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
174 points (99.4% liked)

News

32520 readers
4251 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Patel faces senators as critics question his leadership of the FBI
  • Handling of Kirk shooting probe and Epstein files have drawn scrutiny from Trump allies
  • Patel has sought to align FBI with Trump agenda

WASHINGTON, Sept 16 (Reuters) - FBI Director Kash Patel told a U.S. Senate panel on Tuesday there was no credible information that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked women and underage girls to anyone but himself, seeking to defuse criticism of the Trump administration's move to end its review of the case.

Patel's disclosure about the late financier and convicted sex offender came as he angrily pushed back on questions from the Senate Judiciary Committee about his handling of the investigation into the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk and the firings of veteran officials who have claimed they were removed for political reasons.

Patel told senators the FBI's investigative files on Epstein were limited because a U.S. attorney in Florida improperly narrowed the scope of an investigation into Epstein two decades ago.

The Justice Department's July decision not to release additional material enraged many of President Donald Trump's hardline supporters, who expected his administration to reveal connections between Epstein, who died by suicide while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, and other wealthy and powerful people.

"We have released all credible information," Patel said.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uss_entrepreneur@startrek.website 89 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s wild. You should have no problem releasing the files then. You know to prove your theory.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Getting by on the most technical basis possible, Epstein did traffic girls to his own properties and then invited the other perverts there. So he only trafficked girls to himself in the way that someone throwing a party only buys a 30 rack of beer themselves, not with everyone who will drink out of it there with them at the liquor store

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

But even then that’s demonstrably false. So many of the women and girls that “worked” as “massage girls” for him ended up married to his rich and powerful friends… His accusers all confirm they were many times “given”, for a limited time or permanently, to other powerful men.

This pathetic sycophantic yes man is literally betting we’ll forget things that were in mainstream media, being talked about by everyone, just a few months ago.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who narrowed the scope of the investigation?

Alexander Acosta

Do you know that name, he was trump's first secretary of labor back in his first term.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Acosta

Also, for fucks sake, we know they trafficked Guiffre to Prince Andrew

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Giuffre_v._Prince_Andrew

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right, there's a shitload of credible information all over the place that contradicts what he's saying today. Are they that stupid or just assume we all are?

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They are confident their propaganda machine still works

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems pretty defensive. So he did traffic women and girls, but only to himself? That's like claiming the drug dealer is the only one using the drugs.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In particular when they've already announced over 1000 victims.

How the hell did Epstein have time to rape 1000 victims... and still have so much time to party with and manage money for so many powerful people.

Also yeah, the trafficking itself is such a crazy concept. You don't solo traffic so many people by yourself.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Well if he says it, it must be true. Why do people even bother posting these stories? "Trump says.." "Patel says..." All it does is spread and give credibility to their lies, by posting their lies in the freaking headline.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is an official lie that shows they are actively and publicly obstructing justice instead of just trying to let it fade away through inaction.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Right, you and I know that, but I worry most people just casually browse the headlines quickly, scanning the news highlights, and don't put much thought into it. The way I worry it plays out is someone reads the headline, puts no thought into it, ends up in a social situation later where the topic comes up with and then person says "wait, wait I thought I just saw they said...[regurgitates headline lies]" and now the lies have spread and have some legitimacy to them in the social circle, muddying the waters of the topic and causing confusion on truth, or if the social circle is in agreement of the headline, then just causing more of an echo chamber

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Clicks for media. Just like the media wanted. It fucking pisses me off

[–] AndiHutch@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago

Patel is lying. Here's one from Epsteins Birthday book that got released.

That is a picture of mar-a-logo in the background. The picture comes from Joel Pashcow who put it in the book.

'Pashcow introduced Epstein to Trump in the 1990s when all three moved in the same social circles in both Palm Beach and in New York' according to the Daily Mail

Meanwhile on 9/11, one day after Kirk was killed, Maga Senate Republicans defended Trump by stopping the release of the Epstein Files with a 51-49 vote. What a convenient time for a narrative changing event for the media.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 24 points 1 week ago

Soooooooo..... did Kash Patel just say that Bill Clinton and Bill Gates are NOT implicated in all this? Like, now NO ONE is involved? The Epstein list is 100% fake?

How can any human being say that with a straight face?

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 week ago

What an incredibly stupid lie. Like Epstein was the Santa Claus of raping children, he somehow managed to get into all those houses all by himself in just one night!

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Well if Kash Patel said it, it must be true.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

Patel loves protecting child rapists. Probably likes to watch with those coke eyes of his

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Patel told senators the FBI's investigative files on Epstein were limited because a U.S. attorney in Florida improperly narrowed the scope of an investigation into Epstein two decades ago.

And who would that be, Alex Acosta who was given a cabinet position in Trump's last administration?

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lies, all lies! Like telling the truth would make them physically sick.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Politicians amirite

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

What reality has Patel arrived at this one from? Does coming from another reality make him an illegal immigrant?

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

He's here on the same visa that Melania used.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

He was told what to say, and he said it, that's how.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah. Just a bunch of 1st hand, eye-witness testimony. But, no one listens to the victims, in any real investigation. That would be rude to the accused. /s

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Uh huh. Hey Kash ol' buddy ol' pal, who decides what's credible and what's not? You?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Okay Qanut MAGATs. This is your fuckin’ mess. Well?!

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

What would a flunky involved in a cover-up say?

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Is the meeting with senators public? does anyone have a link?

edit: 4 hour stream by AP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eMs_dDFEIc

(does anyone have tips for youtube frontends for hotlinking nowadays?)

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Hey everyone, let's take this fascist enabling deer caught in headlights at his word.

Anyone see a problem with that?