this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
417 points (97.7% liked)

News

32261 readers
4337 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Here's my tidy narrative: he was raised in MAGA family, was poorly educated and had a lot of exposure to extremists positions but little exposure to critical thinking. When he finally was exposed to different ideology at college he wasn't able to process is correctly and reacted violently, as he was taught to do by his conservative upbringing.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not a narrative though. A narrative is when he is clearly on team A or team B for a handful of cherry picked reasons that reduce his psychology to a caricature.

Coming in here with this sensible straight talking shit... Why I oughta ...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Guy went to college for one semester of virtual classes, and that was enough to radicalize him!? I want whatever you are smoking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Of course he fits into a tidy narrative: whatever one the right wants. Clearly he's trans, trans-adjacent, trans-influenced, trans-atlanic who did a bad because the social contagion eroding the social fabric of western (read: cis straight white male-dominated christian) civilization. We knew these facts before Kirk's body hit the floor.

The rest of the "details" like, reality and evidence or whatever, doesn't really matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StarMerchant938@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

I'm a little annoyed with how quickly everyone here latched onto the Groyper narrative and parroted it as established fact. Seems unhelpful to run with a story before any evidence came out.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 26 points 1 day ago (15 children)

I think it's just common sense. When the fascists start spewing "he's super leftist and trans" propaganda you don't respond with "wait, we have to wait for more facts". You respond with your own propaganda. Being nice and following rules will not help you stop fascism. The groyper narrative might have actually prevented retaliation and saved lives.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah it helped muddy the water and basically kept it liquid and nuclear till the actual facts could assert themselves. Even if the right still thinks he's an Uber leftist what matters is that folks who don't know may not believe that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

I'm sad that the supposedly better side is spreading missinformation and propaganda just like that.

Specially because it's pushing a propaganda about "If your parents are X you are X". Which is really harmful for all the people not following the same ideology as their parents.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

I’ll leave this here for others like me who apparently are really out of the loop

Groypers, sometimes called the Groyper Army, are a group of alt-right, white nationalist, and Christian nationalist 41 activists led by Nick Fuentes. Groypers are a loosely defined group of Fuentes's followers and fans. They are named after a cartoon amphibian named "Groyper", a variant of the Internet meme Pepe the Frog.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 114 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (24 children)

My initial impression of his writings hit me as either Groyper posing as a leftist, or just an accelerationist psychopath.

Either way, it doesn't change the fact that right-wing extremism makes up the majority of violence.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 91 points 1 day ago (5 children)

this country isn’t ready for what the youngest online male zoomers are like lol. i’m a millennial but i’ve been here the whole time watching cultures come and go and the memelord nihilist has been growing since ‘04. there are many variations and they range from sad and pathetic yet ultimately harmless to sad and pathetic and goddamn dangerous. these people can have a mixture of politics and usually prefer whatever has the most public condemnation so they can align themselves with immorality as a point of pride which becomes their identity. fuck having your own beliefs, just follow whatever gets the most negative response from society.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Agreed - I really hate doing this "next generation bad" thing, but this really is a different situation than what we've seen before. The way the Internet creates a feedback loop of extremism around every single topic is terrifying, and people are completely missing the profound effects this is having on developing brains - priming them for radicalization while critical thought atrophies.

When we grew up we had a set of influences which grounded us in reality. Even if we found subversive places on the Internet, we still spent most of our time with our parents and teacher and coaches, etc. This is completely inverted now. Kids traverse the internet like a dog sniffing out idiotic ideas, and when they find the validation they seek, there's seemingly no way to pull it out of them.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 22 hours ago

I used to live in a house that was on a big circle, with all the back yards joining in the middle. None of the houses had fences, so it was just one huge field, with the occasional tree. If that had been my backyard as a kid in the 60s and 70s, that giant field of combined backyards would have been filled with kids every day. I would have known the names of every other kid, where they lived, and probably their parents, too.

But when I lived there about 10 years ago, I seldom saw a single kid out there. In the 5 years I was there, I saw kids playing maybe 3 times.

A couple years before we moved, one of the house on the circle sold to a family with kids. They put a giant fence up, and the kids played in their own backyard, with no contact with others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rozodru@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

as someone what has been online since '96....don't these kids realize we were all joking? evidently not. They take it seriously when "back in my day" we would have ridiculed them for it. I mean I'm old enough to see the rise and fall of 4chan, it's dead now but at it's peak it was dumb troll comics and edgelord antics. Then all of sudden zoomers decided that our shitposts were things to model their lives around.

It's like when I was a kid and we had convinced my friends little brother that if he held a battery on his tongue for long enough he could get mutant powers. like no dude, you're not getting power and confidence, you just look like an idiot with a battery on his tongue.

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 2 points 18 hours ago

i want to push back a little bit on this because while i believe some of us were joking there were tons who weren't and are ultimately responsible for the chronically online zoomers we see today. young gen xers and older millennials built the culture of the late 90s and early 00s internet that became the blueprint for the mid 10s to now. we had some of the worst racism and bullying imaginable on 4chan and it spread to the real world on occasion in horrifyingly cruel ways, like taunting parents of recently deceased kids and shit. we weren't all joksters, the cruelty started early and spread rapidly. we allowed the internet to be eroded by the destruction of anonymity and infiltration of corporate and political interests.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shocking that a terminally online 22 year old doesn’t have a consistent ideology.

I saw a comment on instagram from someone saying Charlie Kirk had had some “powerful comments” in his videos. Checked the profile and there was a ton of pro-environment, anti-cop content. Most people don’t think super hard about their political ideology.

[–] Luccus@feddit.org 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most people don’t think super hard about their political ideology.

This is perhaps the most important insight one can have when it comes to entertaining the 'fun' discussions on christmas dinner. Both in constructing an argument and maintaining healthy relationships.

People really cling to being a "good" person. And not thinking can serve as a shield to maintain this; at least within one's own self-image.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

"not thinking"

It's not so much that, as Wrong Thinking. As humans, we are supposed to employ Critical Thinking, but it isn't instinctual, we have to learn it. Just as importantly, we have to hone our Critical Thinking Skills, and use them constantly. That's how humans are supposed to think.

But if your education didn't include solid Critical Thinking Skills training, then you have a major hole in your ability to process society. That intellectual vacuum wants to be filled by something. Some people don't fill it with anything, and they bounce around making one stupid decision after another. Others fall under the spell of propaganda, which Critical Thinking Skills are particularly successful at resisting, and become radicalized in some way, such as MAGA, or ISIS.

Conservatives have been historically hostile at Critical Thinking Skills curriculum in schools. The Texas Republican Party even once put it in their official platform, explicitly stating that they oppose the teaching Critical Thinking Skills. Imagine creating an official policy that states that they oppose the teaching of PROPER, EFFECTIVE THINKING?

The MAGAs are literally creating a system to deliberately make their constituents more stupid, and vulnerable to manipulation. It's hard to imagine anything more diabolical than that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

The federal conclusion will inevitably be that he was a so-called nihilist violent extremist (NVE)

That is a lot of confidence in the administration to let law enforcement do its job properly and not politicize the findings.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

None of us know anything for certain, but I sure get the sense that this kid is a patsy. I'm inclined to dismiss everything the authorities and the media are saying about him. It all sounds like incongruent nonsense. My fingers are crossed that we actually get to hear him speak before the powers that be murder him.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Why would they have a patsy who doesn’t fit the narrative they want? That makes no sense

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

The "text" messages seem really weird, like someone who is like 40+ tried writing like a much younger person...

Everything seems to add up in just this perfectly awkward way...

And this is my crazy ass thoughts: I'm not even sure the dude is real, or his family is, i have not seen an actual interview from these people who keep saying all these things... is it just a bunch of Ai bullshit? Part of a Cover up?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Juice@midwest.social 5 points 22 hours ago (10 children)

What are you trying to say?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 48 points 1 day ago (6 children)

You mean...they're not transgender?! Who'd thunk it?!

Just mark one up against the stupid "a lot" response Kirk made when asked how many transgender shooters are out there.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›