161

The former president told voters to 'watch' the cities

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 59 points 11 months ago

Neither Trump, nor his supporters, have any clue what it is they are to be watching for.

All the claimed video evidence was either people voting or election workers doing their jobs.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 63 points 11 months ago

It's not about watching. It's about intimidation.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

If they don't know what they're doing, it's not very intimidating. Sad, borderline hilarious, yes.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 27 points 11 months ago

It's not really hilarious if you're in one of the groups that is regularly targeted by them...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

They don't have to do much to intimidate. Such as stand right in front of the boundary line with a rifle strapped to their back.

[-] Shalakushka@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago

It's intimidating because they bring guns and gangs to the polls.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 11 months ago

They're watching for "them", as in "us versus them".

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 9 points 11 months ago

And still very illegal.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 40 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Trump doesn't want them to watch for anything. He wants a bunch of skinheads with guns loitering around the polling places intimidating poll workers and people who want to vote. And when they break polling place security laws like getting too close and police come and arrest them (if they even do that and don't just let them break the law) then they spread videos of, look we're just monitoring but police are hauling us away, what are they hiding at this polling place? Or even better for Trump, violence and polling places getting shut down entirely. He just wants voter suppression and chaos.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 11 months ago

So how do we tackle using speech that is technically ambiguous, but clearly meant to incite violence or stochastic terrorism?

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 11 months ago

Probably by demonstrating a pattern of behavior in a court of law.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Having courts overturn previous established restrictions on the first amendment by adding stochastic statements as a clear infraction the same way yelling Fire in a theater does.

Stop using 'a reasonable man' as a tool of politic when its one of the worst bullshit scapegoats ever for lawmakers who don't want to define shit or step on people's toes by directly calling out what's unreasonable, insane, fascist, or plain stupid.

[-] Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 19 points 11 months ago

Remember back in 2020 when massive crowds of MAGAs were banging on windows and trying to get in while poll workers counted votes? That's what he is trying to get his supporters to do on a nationwide level next year.

[-] theterrasque@infosec.pub 12 points 11 months ago

No no, it's easy. If they see any dark skinned, or democrat looking people vote, they know it's voting fraud.

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 54 points 11 months ago

More voter intimidation tactics. Gee whiz who could've seen that coming...

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

Republicans will never stop trying to steal elections.

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago

Is he going to dress up like the hamburgler and steal them himself? Cause that's the only watching I'll be doing.

[-] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Trump is going to get a bunch of his followers killed.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

I don't think they have the hardware for jilling.

[-] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the heads up. Hilarious typo there....

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I assumed you meant jailed

[-] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

That is already happening

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
161 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3039 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS