this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
142 points (98.6% liked)

Games

21395 readers
305 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ISolox@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Coolio, can we get the steam client to 64 bit as well?

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

We’ve spent most of our lives living in the 32bit paradise

[–] misk@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

IIRC this has been announced as well couple of months ago.

[–] ISolox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you have a link to the announcement? I can't find it online :(

[–] misk@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I tried to search as wall and came up empty - sorry! My best guess for this brainfart is that Valve dropped support for 32-bit on Mac relatively recently and that was after Mac client has been 64-bit for quite some time.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do you want a 64-bit client?

[–] BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You need to download a bunch of i386 dependencies on Linux.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can't imagine the relief felt by the devs.

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Probably a long sighned integer of relief

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

It's frankly amazing that they supported it for so long!

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I now feel sorry for that Fedora dev/maintainer that got thrown over the coals earlier this year for suggesting Fedora drop 32bit now that everyone seems to be, indeed, dropping 32bit.

[–] Keegen@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 days ago

This is a completely different thing, Steam is dropping support for 32bit operating systems. Fedora hasn't had a 32bit release since version 31. What that proposal was about was dropping 32bit packages, which would break old 32bit games (and Steam itself, as it relies on a lot of 32bit libraries as well).

[–] Laser@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago

Pretty sure it's just that Steam will no longer function on 32 bit machines, not that it will no longer be able to launch 32 bit binaries. The latter would make it impossible to run your old games. The fedora proposal would have running 32 bit libraries on 64 bit systems impossible as well, as it included dropping multilib.

[–] BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

64-bit only

Except thr client.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

The first x86-64 processor came out in 2003. Technology sure does move fast.

Edit: checked my old Newegg orders. I bought my first x86-64 processor, an AMD Athlon 64 3200+, in Jan 2005. I seem to remember games were starting to pick up 64-bit support around then (I think Eve Online in particular, which I played a lot back then), so it made sense to switch.

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I remember being so excited for 64bit Far Cry. Had no idea what it meant. But I was excited!

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You what ?

The Pentium came out in 1994.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And when 64-bit support first came to Windows, Microsoft artificially limited the amount of RAM you could use unless you shelled out for the much more expensive editions. On Vista you were arbitrarily limited to 8 gigs with the basic edition, 16 with premium, and even the business editions had a limit of 128 gigs, a tiny fraction of the addressable space under a 64 bit architecture.

Even now there's a limit, though it's insanely high (over a terabyte) and you're unlikely to ever see it unless you're running a server on Windows instead of Windows Server (still limited, but in the dozens of terabytes) or Linux (which has a "limit" in the petabytes).

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Eh, not that big of a deal. The exact same order where I got the 3200+ also had a stick of DDR 400 at all of 256MB. I don't think dual-channel memory was even a thing yet, or I'm sure I would have gone that route. That 8GB limit was a long time off.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't steam a full 32 bit program ?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In that case, your OS (Windows) can run 32-bit apps. The Steam application itself won't have a 32-bit version at some point soon.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, isn’t the steam client 32 bit ? I always have to enable 32 bit repos to install it

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

If it is then I’m surprised. I’ll have to look more into this.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Will this make steam x86_64 (instead of x86)???

That'll probably follow soon after, but I don't really see the benefit, it's not like Steam needs the extra memory or registers...