this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
481 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

16858 readers
1267 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember when my mum was filling out a form as part of the autism assessment, she was like "sounds a lot like my husband as well... And his dad"

[–] F_State@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago

I'm convinced my mom is on the spectrum and my grandparents

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Assuming the data is true (doubt it because of fucking beef jerky man), it's not so much that autism is on the rise so much that autism rates are being diagnosed more and autism is less stigmatized than it was previously.

[–] TheOgreChef@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

If I remember correctly, it fits the same overall curve of the number of reported left handed people over time after society stopped forcibly making people use their right hand. Shockingly, actually making an attempt at diagnosing people and tracking those diagnoses makes numbers go up.

[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Imagine the sexist fascist racist homophobe convicted Cheeto puff is also ablest, please keep adding adjectives that describe the 47th president of the Confederated States

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 69 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Autism diagnosis rates. Quite a difference.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Remember Covid, don't report on things = they stop existing.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well, get out of here with your logic and reason...

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well the cure is clearly to stop testing.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Instances of autism have skyrocketed since the discovery of autism and effective testing for it.

Clearly these tests are causing the autism. It's a conspiracy by Big Autist to make the world a quieter and more curious place. The railway companies are in on it too.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you just predicted the next South Park plot.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Synopsis:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reveals that Tylenol causes autism, he then wants to open a bottle of it, but fails miserably. Then Eric Cartman gets on the stage talking about the evils of autism, then he shows he was bitten by an autistic girl he "played with", but the security footage he shows about the meltdown reveals he terribly bullied her, so people will immediately feel sorry for the girl instead.

Kyle manages to open a bottle of Tylenol, not knowing it summons cenobite-like autists from a different dimension, supposedly turning the people who summon them into autists. The others, save for Cartman, manage to find the same autistic girl bullied by Cartman who can also open that bottle summoning the other-worldly autists, who then be convinced by the boys to take them to the autism-world. Said autism-world is mainly designed around the needs of autistic people. After some shenanigans, there comes the reveal that Kyle was always autistic, the autism-cenobites don't turn anyone into autists as Tylenol bottles can only be opened by other autists, he just was very good at masking, wants to go back to his own world even if there would be people who will bully him for what he is.

Meanwhile, Cartman goes on an "Autism Awareness Tour" to "promote remedies", but tanks them the moment he shows the footage.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Autism tests cause autism, got it, let's roll boys, we have more science to ban

[–] Twipped@l.twipped.social 115 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

If they could read or do comparisonal analysis or could formulate higher-functional abstraction in their frontal lobes, this would really make them think.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That line of best fit doesn't even match the data. How can it start above the data and then finish above the data but still be line of best fit. Not that that's the only problem with this graph of course.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Sorry, it's actually a "best fits our narrative" line. I can see how you might have been confused.

[–] CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

I think it's just a trendline, not a line of best fit.

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 48 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Not autism rates, detection rates is what's up, more kids are growing up with adequate helps and therapies so they can grow to be functional adults.

[–] hunnybubny@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is the same story as gay infecting children's minds.

They are selling awareness as something to be afraid of. Which is yet another layer od evil.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)

In other news, visibility bias has been classified as communist propaganda. Anyone who says this isn't representative of an actual increase in the incidence rate is a communist and can safely be ignored.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Didn't we used to hide it?

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

That's the era they want to drag us back into, even if it costs us suicide and/or substance abuse.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yes. This is an artifact of a destigmatization coupled with better diagnostics for evaluating ASD. More people aren't autistic, more people are being diagnosed and receiving counseling for coping with the neurldivergence in a cold and uncaring neurotypical world.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Will this administration release data on the impact of fossil emissions on diseases like asthma?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] amotio@lemmy.world 203 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The source is "I made it the fuck up!"

Also ignoring improvements in diagnostics.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 3 days ago (8 children)

I mean, it says the source right there, it's the CDC...

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 73 points 3 days ago (6 children)

The organization run by a brain worm driving a human suit?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Flaqueman@sh.itjust.works 182 points 3 days ago

Number of unvaxxed kids also growing in the past 22 years. I think it proves that autism is caused by lack of vaccine.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

you know, everest was still there before it was discovered.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] guy@piefed.social 70 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In my country there has been a huge increase in both ADHD and autism diagnoses the last decades. At the same time in those years the methods to discover both diagnoses have improved greatly.
But you know, correlation does not equal causation..

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 days ago

Mandating helmets for the boys at the front is resulting in many more head injuries!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (4 children)
  1. Autism is a spectrum., same as gender ideology. Whether you like it or not, it's true.
  2. We're better at diagnosis
  3. Preconceived notions about such things aren't as prevalent, until recently for political reasons
[–] Monzcarro@feddit.uk 14 points 2 days ago

I'm a woman in my 40s who is probably autistic, but back then I was the wrong demographic and "too well behaved" to even consider diagnosis. I'm a typical example people think of when thinking about under diagnosis.

On the other hand, I work with people who have severe learning disabilities who also evaded diagnosis, or were diagnosed well into adulthood as diagnosis is difficult in someone so impaired. In another time, they would have been labelled with a grossly offensive term and just left. Better treatment of disabled people is probably another reason we see rising rates of diagnosis.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 98 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Now show the testing rate over the same time period!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 37 points 3 days ago

Before you get more downvotes, it's a reference folks: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sergio@piefed.social 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This graph will live forever, in intro classes, as an example of how not to do things.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Im confused, it's got both axis labeled and seems pretty easy to read.

Maybe points off for having the labels on the outside rim of the graphic.

Doesn't change the fact that classification of autism also changed over those years, but the graph itself is okay.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 days ago

10 out of a 1000 to 30ish out of a 1000 doesn’t even seem like a massive increase, especially if it’s really due to something like a pain medication that is taken by a huge population. Which it’s not as it’s more related to improvements in diagnosing.

I guess they are just hoping people see bar go up and therefore bad.

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For some reason, that doesn't look like a GPT-generated graph, which means... sadly... that someone had to make that thing.... and somebody had to approve it.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you bet it's not even based on real data and it's just some random rectangles that they drew.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›