this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
481 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

16858 readers
651 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For some reason, that doesn't look like a GPT-generated graph, which means... sadly... that someone had to make that thing.... and somebody had to approve it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Can somebody smarter than me tell me what this is trying to say? There’s a bar for surveillance year and birth year. But, for instance, 2012 is on the graph twice with different values. What does it mean?

Edit:

I think I got it. The graph is of “Autism rates in 8 year olds over time”. And the X axis should just be year (in 2 year increments).

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 20 points 3 days ago (4 children)

2012 appears once as a birth year and once as a surveillance year. The graph says that they only ever surveyed 8-year-olds, since the birth year is always 8 less than the surveillance year.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

prevalence of cancer has increased ∞% since 0 BC

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

The axis makes sense with the label, they just didn't label every data point.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 13 points 3 days ago

It looks nepotism put a failson in charge of this graph.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Guarantee you the people afraid of autism has no idea what it even is, other than "bad"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

There is an 𝑥 axis and it's not too hard to comprehend, although I'd prefer the dividing character to be newline rather than "|", or only show the surveillance year.

Also, the "trendline" is sus, an actual trendline cannot always be above data.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rirus@feddit.org 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

What's wrong with the x-Axis?

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think it’s birth cohorts

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

When people say autism they think of the nonverbal kind not the model train kind.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also remember that we only had diagnostic tools for adult autism beginning in the 1980s.

The rise of autism diagnosis does not necessarily equal a rise in autism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

maybe that's why they were elected lol

/s

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 9 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Can anyone decipher the graph for me?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Plum@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

....................... did they adjust the data points to go from lowest to highest

......so the chart go up?

.....

*I wrote down the data on a napkin and it makes more sense. These fuckers made a Bad Graph.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Military spending also increased from 2000-2022, ergo military spending causes autism.

That's like saying we have more cancer now than in the past.

Sure, that might be true in certain scenarios (we're very good at creating new ways to give ourselves cancer).

The truth is that we're living longer, increasing the risk and likelihood of cancer, and we've gotten a LOT better at finding and diagnosing cancer and specific types.

[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago
[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago
[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago

I think the x axis is "year of measurement | year of birth" since they are 8 years apart. Very unconventional and it would need an explanation but it's not bad to have both pieces of information handy in this context

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Yeah Autism rates are going up in all groups because people are getting diagnoses. This is partly about better awareness but also partly about money - there is an incentive to expand the diagnosis, diagnose more people and treat more people, which somewhat muddies the water. Autistic Spectrum Disorder first appeared in the American DSM in 2012, unifying 5 existing conditions into one, and then it moved into the international ICD in 2018 (going live in 2022). It is no wonder awareness has gone up, and infrastructure for diagnosis has rolled out.

We're not seeing an increase in Autism, we're seeing an increase in the diagnosis of autism. This graph just shows how stupid and dumbed down the CDC and the White House is under this cretinous president.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Absolute nonsense graph. Buckle up, this shit is going to get way worse.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›