this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
436 points (99.5% liked)

politics

25940 readers
1996 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Lmao. Who’s going to penalize this fucking criminal? Anyone?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well it’ll probably result in these cases getting dropped

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHHHHAHAHAA --

inhale

-- HAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I get it but the Trump admin isn’t exactly doing great in the courts. Even with the Supreme Court the way it is.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

That must be why the lower courts are doing the thing where they go "Yeah, that was totally illegal, but we're gonna let it stand anyway."

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He will be getting coal in his stocking

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Or shit in his diapers at a minimum, at least he’s got that coming to him.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 week ago

Trump admin may have already broken the law

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

If only there were consequences, then this would have meaning.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

"May have"? The dude commits like 3 felonies on his way to breakfast ffs

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 week ago

And? Laws don't matter to these people.

When there are consequences for a law being broken by these folks, report that.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

If only there were laws for bloated old pedo billionaires

Throw it on the pile

[–] mrslt@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Surely this will be the point at which he faces consequences...

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Pretending the Trump administration hasn't already broken the law is massive click bait.

Also, billionaires will still be legal under the Democrats. That's the real reason Trump got in, and the real problem.

Returning to "the norm" is not a solution. They'll just be another Trump eventually unless the billionaire problem is addressed.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

LOL. How exactly do you expect a politician to address "the billionaire problem"?

[–] ape_arms@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Well, in a perfect world, where the POTUS is immune from prosecution when executing official acts, they could seize their assets. Would it ever happen? The only way I could envision is if the vast majority of the population supports (or is indifferent to) such an action. But hey, we currently have a $200b secret police force roaming the land, so maybe there's a chance!

But seriously, an extreme wealth tax would be a step in the right direction.

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's Mario's brother's name? Politicians have more access than us regular folks.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm a dingus replying to the wrong comment! Look at me go! Now I've come back to edit it to this!

[Edited]

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm literally advocating for the assassination of billionaires. I don't understand your comment at all.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh sorry, I meant to reply to the comment you were replying to. My bad.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're doing a "the perfect is the enemy of the good".

Wealth tax, banning people from owning more than two investment properties. Have laws that put a ratio on the highest paid in companies to the lowest paid.

"It's too difficult and politicians are too complicit already, so don't complain" just isn't a good contribution. You either support that billionaires are a problem or you don't.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah. I'm just doing a "not completely naive".

It's possible to simultaneously acknowledge that wealth inequality is a problem and that it's not going to be addressed.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's an inaccurate perception of what you did, you didn't acknowledge the problem and now you're pushing your assumption that "nothing can or will be done".

ALL you're doing is dampening the possibility and providing the billionaire class cultural comfort by providing apathy for the masses.

It's not about truth, it's about possibility. Had a cultural comfort girl like yourself been in Luigi Mangione's position you would have laid down and died unnoticed.

You're the problem. People who claim to be "just seeking the truth" but are actually giving false assumptions as if they're certainties are the problem.

Give possibility, give hope. In this, the cultural space you're giving "billionaire boot licker", and I think that might be your own choice and what you actually want.

You're a stability and truth is better than equality, hope and cultural change kind of person.

You even started with "LOL" like a smug rich movie villain. Then to pretend you agreed it was a problem and gave truth? No you gave your own emotionally informed cultural defeatism.

You comfort billionaires and tell them to keep pissing, that's your choice. Your cope. Your pushing of apathy.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

LOL. Cry more, maybe the billionaires will stop existing.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

LOL, they're not gonna give you money just because you're willing to blow them.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ROFLMAO ... but I sucked so much dweeb to get where I am.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

You only wanna be the best that you can...

[–] F_State@midwest.social 17 points 1 week ago

They break the law constantly, every day

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

They almost certainly did. They are colossal dumbasses.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I read it somewhere that anyone talking rule of law or the Constitution anymore is starting to sound like sovereign citizens, waving a document around like it's a magic shield that in reality does absolutely nothing.

I would like to disagree with this thought process, but I can't.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

The law is not self-enforcing.

Since the government is now lawless, it's up to the citizenry to deliver what justice we can.

[–] Elbow1240@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

I bet Comey really regrets releasing that memo in 2016.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Added to the list for no further action...

[–] echo 9 points 1 week ago

Breaking the law is a prerequisite for these stupid, fascist fucks...

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago
[–] Philote@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Trump- “Put it on my tab.”

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I were on Trump's hit list I'd seek political asylum someplace sunny.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Kimmel should really take that job offer in Germany

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When people break the law, they are punished, right?..........right? Is that just another fairy tale like Santa Claus and the tooth fairy?

[–] F_State@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

Depends on how rich, powerful, and/or well connected they are.