this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
690 points (98.7% liked)

Political Memes

9575 readers
2647 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 119 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That actually took a bit longer than I expected. Almost 2 hours for them to start lying.

Edit: the timestamps in the screenshot are rounded. It took almost 1:30:00 for them to make the accusations.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

On that platform. I’m sure it was posted elsewhere within five minutes and the opinion “leftists at it again” appended.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago

That's not a news broadcaster but some rando on Reddit with one upvotes...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As a proper American, I found about this latest shooting through memes. This one.

[–] BuckWylde@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago
[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 55 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I don’t understand NPR here. I listen to WNYC, it may be different but I don’t think this meme is correct about them. Prove me wrong, please.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Generally I think they try to painfully aim to be neutral, but with the Kirk shooter they seemed to indulge the jump to paint him as leftist and let the coverage emphasize the trans romantic partner angle and taking the bullet messages at face value without even mentioning the Groyper angle.

I think they mean well, but then I see it be all for naught. They had a right winger on and let him say as he like about how folks on the right have suffered and how it's all the left's fault, that all the violence has been leftists and they let him go on like this for a bit. Then they tried to at least add the context that not long ago multiple democrat politicians were killed and the right wing killer had a hit list to kill more of them, and the right winger just exploded about how unfair they were being and how they shouldn't exist as a news organization for daring to politicize the tragedy of Kirk's death.

Have also heard them trying to throw a life preserver to right wing interviewees to offer them a more legitimate sounding point than the craziness they were saying. Though more often than not the person rejects the potentially reasonable sounding rationale and looks all the more stupid for doubling down on their ridiculous rationale, so it still sometimes works.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

NPR often times reports what is being reported, so if the rest of the media is saying it then NPR will say that’s what’s being said.

Sometimes it has the effect of adding their voice to the pile.

[–] GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 days ago

Same. I listen to both WUWM and WPR very regularly, and I have yet to hear them parrot this narrative.

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

When it's obviously a right winger, best they can do is "both sides" the narrative

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 88 points 3 days ago (5 children)
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Haha the guy's leaning right, but it's the viewer's left, so he's left leaning.

But he's holding the bird with his left hand, because he's leftist.

Everything is left if you want it bad enough lol.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

the lean is also a clue that he's a beta and thus votes democrat alpha males are always completely perpendicular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nothing more murican than realtree camo my friend... 😂

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

American conservatism is a violent, racist, fascist movement.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (9 children)

What is up with military vets going on wild killing sprees this past week?

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 62 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Untreated PTSD with a large dose of hate speech and propaganda.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Ding ding ding. On the nose. You win a gun.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Could be violations to their constitutional oaths by their erstwhile leaders spurring them on

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

does it really surprise you that people trained to kill would… kill?

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

To some degree yes. About half the males in my high school graduating class went to Iraq and Afghanistan, most saw combat, and I don’t think any of them would go on a killing spree like the past two. I work along side many veterans, including ex special forces, and I don’t believe they would go on a killing spree.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Finally, in news from the US, a crazy person attacked a local crazy cult. And now, the weather...

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

All religions are cults. And now, the sports.....

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 35 points 3 days ago

Of you zoom right in there’s trans ideology engraved on the fish.

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 days ago (2 children)

NPR? BBC? I'm confused by this meme now...

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The so-called "left-leaning“ (in reality Centrist at the best of times and sometimes quite far right) media have a frequent tendency to report on ridiculous claims by the fascists without any indication that it's utter nonsense or even that there's no evidence for it.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Can I get a citation for NPR doing this? That would be surprising

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Editorial "backstops" courtesy of anonymous donors.

https://www.podcastnewsdaily.com/news/report-npr-staffers-upset-over-new-editorial-backstop-plans/article_fb8101e2-146c-11ef-ac87-1305981c9fbf.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/16/business/npr-editing-backstop.html

I've been listening to NPR for years and since 2024 they started including right wing rhetoric in their reporting. It started getting really obvious the closer we got to the last election.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I listen to NPR as well, have for years, donate to my local station, and I've only ever heard them discuss right-wing talking points as exactly that: clearly labeled right-wing talking points that are relevant to informing listeners about the current state of the national discourse.

While anonymous donors of any kind rub me the wrong way, the article you linked doesn't provide evidence of the things I was asking for citations about.

Rather it specifically talks about a) concerns about the rapidity of journalism within NPR when having to go through more editor review and b) accusations of left-leaning bias from a former employee

I appreciate your concerns but the links you provided don't back up the claims I was responding to, and while they are concerning for a few reasons, none of those reasons are "becoming more right wing" or "repeating right wing talking points as fact or opinion".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah idk why you're upvoted, unless I'm missing something. The articles you linked(could only read the first as the 2nd is behind a paywall) only talk about how much slower NPRs coverage may become due to the backstops. Nothing implies that they have become unreliable news.

I'm unconvinced that NPR is unreliable based on your info. I listen to their planet money, the 1A, and the indicator broadcasts. The 1A especially has recently been openly and bluntly criticizing the fascists movements of Trump/Republicans. The indicator and planet money are more economics focused (rather than politically focused than 1A ) but even they will criticize Republican actions if it doesn't align with economic theories.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

BBC haven't been impartial for a while, example

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 42 points 3 days ago

Thomas Sanford once received racial left medical care

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Am I the only one who can't get over "Jacbob" ?

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Sounds like he was almost named "Jacknobobyeahthatsbetter"'

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 30 points 3 days ago

He looks like he's been indoctrinated in extreme trans gender violence.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A duck for a fuck, a fuck for a duck, or 25 cents for a fucked up duck

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

damn where are these prices 1990? 25 cents won't even get me part of a fucked up duck anymore

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (20 children)

This radical leftist would love to do some duck hunting. I’m pretty good at clays and getting a meal at the end would be even better

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] zululove@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Worked for Feds that’s all you need to know bet he went to fort Bragg as well

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Military isn't the feds. Military also isn't not the feds, but it is more not the feds than it is not not the feds. Either way military is definitely not equal to feds, we just worked for them, mostly, kinda.

Signed a USN Captain Vet.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is there some chance that this is a Catholic on Mormon retribution killing spree?

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago

That was my theory. Not Catholic, but because the kid that supposedly helped Kirk complete his desire.

load more comments
view more: next ›