this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
222 points (96.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

13425 readers
689 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is supposedly a EV battery ejection system to make battery fires easier to control. Pedestrians and cyclists had best say goodbye to their lower legs.

Source

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 7 hours ago

Somewhere in a Vega's parking lot.... Pop! Poppop! Pop pop! Pop pop pop! Pop! Pop!
Pop pop pop pop pop!
Pop pop!

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Why not just make nonincendiary batteries...?

[–] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

The fact that it's a battery means that it's incindiary

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

My immediate thought was, why not use this to enable standardized quick-swappable batteries? Maybe not with quite as much ejection force though.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

My first thought when it popped out the side of the car was "I wonder if I could surf that battery across the road..."

[–] darkreader2636@lemmy.zip 16 points 18 hours ago

Good luck ejecting a spicy pillow(it'll probably get stuck in place)

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 20 points 19 hours ago

Was my problem, now it's your problem. It's called hot potato.

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just wait till the car gets hacked and some one starts remotely erecting batteries.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Erecting?

I sat here for a good two minutes trying to find something witty and funny to say Finally all I really want to do is tell you that you used the wrong word.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Could be worse.

In my job they send a copy of all the health and safety stuff to each employee once a year. Part of that is something about fire safety.

For some reason they didn't send me the German original version but the English translation instead.

In there it says that the fire safety officer alone is responsible for all erections.

We had a good laugh.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

If you dig far enough Into Osha saftey documentation, you'll find a page where they advocate the use of a saftey wench.

[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 6 points 20 hours ago

Lots of work to do

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah stupid auto correct. I’m just leaving it

[–] snf@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Ok but what was it meant to be? Ejecting?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Fuck it if the car can erect its own batteries I think it's overengineered

[–] Naich 148 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Fits perfectly with the general "fuck everyone else" nature of cars.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

I’m picturing a crew of emergency responders approaching. They all get taken out “in the name of safety”, and the rest decide to vote with the legs they still have and refuse to approach

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago

This totally won't be abused in case of road rage, absolutely not.

[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 106 points 1 day ago

many of you will die, but it's a sacrifice my SUV is willing to make

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Another point: When those batteries get bad, don't they blow up? And wouldn't this make the battery jam in place?

[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If anything, the force will probably make it worse. Why not just kick the unstable, explosive battery that’s now stuck in place.

Dumb idea.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Yep. There is a lot of dumb in this design. I'd say some manager pissed his pants about his ass in an EV and demanded a solution... any solution.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yea! Shoot the burning battery right under the fuel tanker in the lane next to you!

[–] porksnort@slrpnk.net 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

If this becomes common, eventually there will be a chain reaction on a crowded grid-locked freeway.

It will work something like this:

Nuclear Fission

Oh the huge manatee!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I thought you were referring to the Ford Nucleon...

[–] porksnort@slrpnk.net 2 points 23 hours ago

That might have been safer than the OP concept.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 45 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Tfw the car catch fire and you're stepping out but the car yeet the problem right back at you

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 21 points 1 day ago

Stepping outk if it's not a Tesla ;)

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

this can't go wrong.

a scared person hurting someone innocent? inconceivable with this device

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What happens if the frame gets bent in a wreck? I guess you’re probably not any worse off than you are currently in a wreck with an EV, but it seems a little silly to make this rely on the car not getting too crumpled during a car wreck to work.

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

"a little silly", is a very kind way to describe it

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago

RIP first responders.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

That's a total non starter. There is zero chance this ever gets implemented.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

hey I watched this episode of ST: TNG

[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Stranger Things. The Next Generation

Nailed it

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Terrified 1%ers knowing they’ve got targets pasted on them.

load more comments
view more: next ›