this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
66 points (89.3% liked)

News

32530 readers
2776 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is the guy that made his name from the Real World game show, right?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

https://archive.is/DTzzq

It's regarding a private plane that left the area shortly after, if anyone else was wondering wtf the secretary of transportation had to do with this. And no, he didn't dig himself into a hole.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago

Agreed. The Daily Beast is very hit-and-miss with its headlines. Always going for the hit.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It left an airport less than 15 mins away from the university and disabled it's tracking near the Arizona border 30 mins into the flight.

Digging into the jet conspiracy, Duffy told his followers “the plane’s owner stated that radar services with air traffic control (ATC) were ended by mutual agreement,” clarifying that “private pilots can voluntarily request to cancel radar services, and that ATC may approve.”

That itself isn't really all that strange, but it was turned turned back on around 2:30 when they left Page Arizona. So why request it end right as you're about to reach your destination, then turn it back on?

It also seems to conflict with what Kash Patel said last week.

After interviews with the pilot and consultation with the FAA, we determined the transponder was not turned off. Incomplete flight data in rural areas caused the apparent gap."

So was it just a loss of signal? If so why did they request FAA cancel radar services?

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I just have a basic pilots license (PPL) but a lot of rural airports it's normal to cancel radar services (IFR / flight following) when you have the airport in sight because there's no tower and you're making location callouts on the airport frequency in case there's traffic nearby. ATC can and will ask to let you go without if they're busy or whatever as well.

Especially in mountainous areas radar/transponder coverage can be pretty spotty unless you're pretty high up or near a larger airport.

Smells like any other random conspiracy theory.

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Radar still tracks them if they cancel flight following, it just means ATC doesn't have to provide them with traffic advisories or other guidance. Also there are loads of ADSB trackers (how flight aware works) that they would have to shut their transponder off to disable, which is not what sounds like happened.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who knows? Weird shit happens every day.

If they were trying to do a sneaky, they would have just left it off the whole time.

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Going on the assumption that these folks are competent. Just being funny, I agree that it's probably nothing and that these officials are so out of their depth, they can't properly explain anything.