this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
63 points (83.2% liked)

News

32530 readers
2784 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s Office of Management and Budget under Russell Vought has moved with more executive authority over spending, which is typically left to Congress. The administration took steps to cancel foreign aid and asserted power to withhold billions of domestic spending.

“I would expect this shutdown to look different than any other shutdown,” said Joshua Sewell, Taxpayers for Common Sense director of research and policy. He said he expects that the Trump team’s actions would be guided by what they believe achieves the most for them politically.

Trump could use a shutdown to dismantle government functions, wrote Max Stier, chief of executive of the Partnership for Public Service, a nonprofit focused on improving the federal government.

If lawmakers can’t reach a deal, Stier wrote, Trump and Vought “will have enormous latitude to determine which services, programs, and employees can be sidelined, decisions that could go far beyond what has occurred during past shutdowns.”

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 5 hours ago

The government has been in shutdown for months.

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 hours ago

Except he's going to do it anyway. It's never "Give me what I want or I'll hurt you" with Trump. It's always "AND I'll hurt you.". That's why negotiating with him is worthless.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Trump dismantled USAID and it's effectively toast even though Congress is the only group legally allowed to end it. This is shit he would've done anyway on a different time schedule. Here's hoping he bites off more than he can chew and loses another 5% of his base.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 41 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

"Trump could use a shutdown to dismantle government functions" He already did that. We had this discussion already the last time, before Schumer and the rest folded. Then he did more of it after they folded. Why is this being trotted out as a threat again?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Because it's the excuse for not using the filibuster they refused to get rid of for the last two congressional majorities on the grounds that they need it to block republicans when democrats are in the minority.

To get low info voters to think keeping the gov open is a good idea.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

Exactly.

The awful shit is going to be awful either way, but one way is democrats helping them be awful.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They are already laying people off and have been for the whole time.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but it's still important people know about this memo before they lay all these people off. Schumer still seems to be going through with it:

“This is nothing new and has nothing to do with funding the government,” he said. “These unnecessary firings will either be overturned in court or the administration will end up hiring the workers back, just like they did as recently as today.”

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Maybe I am misinformed but what’s the difference if a shutdown happens or not for people being laid off?

A RIF is not the same as a furlough and he could ask at any time for those jobs to be cut and he ether does have the authority to fire those people or he doesn’t but the shutdown doesn’t really have any effect on that

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 68 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Jesus fucking Christ, stop trying to come up with more terrible ideas why the democrats should capitulate. What the actual fuck. They must not knuckle under for ANY reason. You used to be better than this, NPR.

That’s exactly how this reads.

An attempt to goad the Dems into caving.

Transparent as fuck. They need to hold strong.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 16 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think they're necessarily telling them to capitulate, but this is due to a memo released a few days ago.

It might be an empty threat or it might be one of those damned if you do damned if you don't situations.

In the memo, OMB told agencies to identify programs, projects and activities where discretionary funding will lapse Oct. 1 and no alternative funding source is available. For those areas, OMB directed agencies to begin drafting RIF plans that would go beyond standard furloughs, permanently eliminating jobs in programs not consistent with President Donald Trump’s priorities in the event of a shutdown.

The move marks a significant break from how shutdowns have been handled in recent decades, when most furloughs were temporary and employees were brought back once Congress voted to reopen government and funding was restored. This time, OMB Director Russ Vought is using the threat of permanent job cuts as leverage, upping the ante in the standoff with Democrats in Congress over government spending.

Even if the government shuts down it's important people understand this is most likely coming. It's better for people to be angry about this before the fact so they know who to blame once the shutdown happens, bc the GOP is definitely going to try and blame the layoffs on the Democrats as if this was their fault for allowing the shutdown.

But House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries struck a different note in an X post that appeared to take the threat seriously. He addressed it to voters in federal-worker-rich Virginia, who will soon elect a governor and other state officials. “Their goal is to ruin your life and punish hardworking families already struggling with Trump Tariffs and inflation,” he said. “Remember in November.”

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

My take on it, they're not going to just layoff people because there is a shutdown. They want to lay all of these people off eventually regardless of funding the government.

If they're going to lay them off either way, then it's not really a threat nor is it part of the budget discussions. They've played their hand and it doesn't really shift the discussion.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago

They’re also ignoring the limits of their powers, so shutting down won’t give them any more powers than they’ve been taking either.

And writing about giving the administration “talking points” is even dumber. Since they lie about everything being the left’s fault already anyway.

[–] Mobiuthuselah@mander.xyz 11 points 17 hours ago

Congress loves to hold themselves hostage at the sake of federal workers and the American people. They get paid either way, go on vacation. May even give themselves a raise.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 10 points 18 hours ago

Isn't this the same excuse they used the last time they gave him everything he wanted, without a fight? Are we doing it again, then?

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 21 points 21 hours ago

Doesn't the Regime already do this via Executive Order which may or may not be challenged later? Why would they need a ahutdown?

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 6 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Is a shutdown each year now a regular thing in USA? Sounds like lawmakers should legislate some budget protections.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Congress hasn't passed a full budget since 1996.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 18 hours ago

It's another symptom of the dysfunction of Congress; they can't get 60 senators to agree on a long-term funding bill.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Yeah the republicans have realized that they can demand anything they want to be part of the budget so every year we have a government shutdown then lose some rights to get it up again

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

They have legislated various protections. But it always comes down to two parties split about evenly yet needing 60% to pass….. and since it became ok to shut down the government there’s no longer an incentive to negotiate bipartisan solutions

[–] blave@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

Only if somebody doesn’t take this as an opportunity to assassinate him.

For the betterment of the nation, of course

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago

I think the plan is to force a shutdown, then seize power saying that the legislature “can’t run the country” so trump has to do it

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 20 hours ago

That made sense in the spring and is one of the reasons I was for not shutting it down then. would have just played into what he was doing. He already tore everything up though and hes not hard to read. He don't want it. Im fine with shutdown this go round.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Fuck off with the censoring.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

He will have power to decide who to pay but he will be powerless to the backlash from constituents. People are already pissed at him