this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
198 points (100.0% liked)

News

32583 readers
2966 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Taiwan will not agree to a deal with the United States for half of all semiconductor production to take place in the country, the island's top tariff negotiator said on Wednesday after returning home.

U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick told U.S. television network News Nation over the weekend that Washington's pitch to Taiwan would be a 50-50 split in making chips, the vast majority of which are now made on the island.

Taiwan Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun, who is leading the tariff talks with Washington, told reporters upon getting back to the island that she had not discussed the 50-50 idea suggested by the U.S. during the talks.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why would they ever take this “deal”?

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You mean this scam to get all their chip facilities before we abandon them like our other long-time allies?

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

And remove any need to offer them security from China

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

People think Taiwan doesn't have a strong position in negotiations when in fact they do.

America literally can't remove its protection of Taiwan

America doesn't want China to have full control of the Taiwanese straight as it's an important strategic route and they would immediately lose access to a strategic chip partner.

Forget 50\50 losing Taiwan gets them 0

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think those are all good reasons why a sane America wouldn't abandon Taiwan. This America however...

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It would be disastrous for the country both economically and strategically. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be much of a deterrent for this administration. If anything, that would seem to align with their existing policies.

[–] imrighthere@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 days ago

I wouldn't give the usa half of my sandwich at this point.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good. Don't negotiate with terrorists.

[–] waldo_was_here@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

And criminals, or rapist

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

They would have been stupid as hell to take it. Taiwan is well aware of its value to America

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would counter with give us something like alcatraz to become legally part of taiwan and we will forgo the maritine rights and build the chips there. Or maybe an alutian island or such.