this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
537 points (97.4% liked)

Facepalm

3430 readers
21 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

LOL unfortunately optics don't scale.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I gotta wonder how awesome that camera is, tho. The rest of the phone got a few millimeters thinner, while the lenses on the camera got a bit fatter. Does it have a physical lens zoom instead of just digital zoom?

Half. A millimeter thinner. And then there's that ridiculous camera bump.

For scale, my Galaxy S10e is 7.9mm thick. Measuring it just now, with a screen protector and a lens protector, it's 9.5mm thick at the camera bump. And I already sometimes struggle to grip it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How about a display with no camera, no blue tooth, no SD card slot.... Just a touch display, that's internet and phone capable. Nothing else.

Maybe offer a modular camera you can attach somehow if people want that add on.

[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could be a dumb terminal with the processing done elsewhere.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

the camera is 0.3 megapixels and they just do generative upscaling on that

what do you mean that's not your dad? AI can't be wrong.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

They're designed that way to get you to buy $50 cases injection molded from a few cents worth of plastic.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›