this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
689 points (99.9% liked)

Open Source

41208 readers
1273 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The project, developed in partnership with veteran free software developer Rob Savoye, aims to create a fully free and open mobile platform, from the firmware to the operating system.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

Tell me more about the phone! This has taken so long and I am ready to migrate to an open phone even if it's only for texting at this point.

Screw this OS monopoly by Apple and Alphabet.

Open to simple solutions here. I have a Pixel 4a 5g and iPhone 12 atm.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 9 points 3 hours ago
[–] koncertejo@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago

I've got a Google Pixel 3a with postmarketOS installed on it right now for testing, and it really is a two-pronged issue with both hardware and software. Because it's an older phone the battery drains within a few hours, nowhere close to all-day use. Because most of the software is designed for the desktop certain things are just impossible to use (the big pain point for me is Anki, but on the other hand it's impressive how many GTK apps conform very nicely to the screen). The keyboard still feels pretty rough.

Hopefully the FSF dipping their hat into the ring will help existing projects like this in a rising-tide-raises-all-ships sort of way. Would be a shame for them to put effort into a software stack that goes nowhere (GNU Hurd), and pour $$$ into a hardware project that doesn't make it to market or doesn't do its job better than a cracked smartphone from 5+ years ago.

I think it is possible to switch to it now and have things mostly work out for you, but it will make your life harder. I remember switching to Ubuntu around 2010 and it's almost to that level of experience. You'll be giving up a lot, apps you "need" won't work, but it's at the point where it is a complete usable experience. For those that are willing to suffer for FOSS, I mean.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Damn. Software has existed 40 years now?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 1 hour ago

Not only that: it was big enough to get mad at 40 years ago already.

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago

What a nice thing to do

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 hours ago

Hopefully this will recruit projects that already have significant headstart, such as Pine64. Otherwise, it would merely be performative.

[–] Patariki@feddit.nl 80 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I salute the early adopters who will suffer all the inconveniences of startups so the wider public can enjoy a non-corporate phone in the future. o7

[–] schema@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm looking forward to get one of these just to play around with it, and maybe making some custom stuff for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

As soon as my current phone is paid off I am going to get this. No more fucking Spyware up the ass.

[–] Coopr8@kbin.earth 1 points 12 minutes ago

The project just launched and is a software-first project. We won't see a Libre Phone available for a while yet.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 53 points 11 hours ago

I hope they can pull this off because we really need this.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 31 points 13 hours ago

Oooh, I wonder if they're going to pursue a free phone based on Risc-V. It's a longshot but if they pull that off, it'd be like feeding two birds with one scone.

[–] Ultraword@lemmy.ml 22 points 14 hours ago

I really hope this is super based

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 41 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Linux mobile phones are the fusion power of the FOSS world, always right around the corner.

All the pieces are there, but none of them work together smoothly enough to be functional for anybody except the most hardcore FOSS enthusiasts.

When Proton started, it was kind of a joke, killed the Steam Machine idea in large part because the game compatibility was so limited. A decade later, we have a multi billion dollar handheld PC market lead by the Steam Deck, a Linux handheld that can play tens of thousands of Windows games without issue, in some cases with better performance than their native platform.

So it's certainly possible for things to completely change, but we need a big player or consortium of players to unite with a shared goal of getting a Linux Phone to the state where it's genuinely able to replace a traditional Android or Apple phone.

I'm very cautiously optimistic, I think it would come together much faster than Proton did for Linux gaming, but again, there needs to be a really heavy push into a singular device to start off. Like how the Steam Deck was, it allowed devs to have a singular platform to target for compatibility. Then, as the platform matures, competitors & innovators can enter the market and expand options, like how now there are multiple distros with builds for handhelds, like Bazzite, Nobara, and CachyOS.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Bazzite sounds like it would be a good start for the OS, though, and that exists now.

[–] Canuck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

I would love if Valve shipped and contributed to Plasma Mobile and Plasma Bigscreen alongside the existing Plasma Desktop. Or even if more Steam Deck users installed it so that it would get more interest.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 81 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I want a Linux phone so bad that I refuse to think about what it would be like because i'd be upset afterwards.

[–] fleg@szmer.info 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I have an original PinePhone. The phone itself is horribly outdated and slow, but the software itself (Phosh+Gnome) is suprisingly okay. Given a good enough phone (as in hardware) I can see myself actually using it and not being annoyed more than I was with early Androids.

Unfortunately what I understand is that FSFE doesn't intend to do hardware, only software platform, so I wonder whether they'll come up with anything interesting.

[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

Running PostmarketOS on hardware such as the Oneplus 6T (which is 8 years old now) shows that you could truly have dog shit cheap hardware for this. As long as you have decent driver support for it.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 18 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Just because it's a libre phone, doesn't mean it's necessarily a linux phone. Or at least any more so than Android is a linux phone because it uses a heavily modified (almost unrecognizable) linux kernel.

There's nothing in the article that says they're just going to use a mainline linux kernel and throw a touch optimized version of some existing desktop on it (ubuntu touch, etc...)

Heck, they could be meaning that they're planning on making their own heavily modified kernel for their very own OS so as to skip all of the trouble that trying to make mainline linux into a handheld device has been so far. (similar to I believe how SailfishOS is doing it)

[–] compcube@lemy.lol 4 points 3 hours ago

Finally, a GNU/Hurd phone! /s

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 1 points 6 hours ago

Does anyone claim so? And does it matter much outside of (potentially) app support?

[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 5 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Why couldn't they just use usual Linux for that? Why a modified kernel? Is Linux as is not suitable for a phone?

Can't they just, idk, make a distro? Maybe from scratch? Pop!_OS is working on COSMIC. Can't they have their Linux-based OS, perhaps with its own things as needed, such as a phone-optimised DE? Or whatever the phone equivalent of a DESKTOP environment would be. A Mobile Environment, perhaps

If my laptop had touch screen with no other method of input built in, and were way smaller, could it not run Linux? Or is that different altogether?

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Linux by design gives the user enough rope to hang themselves with.

And that's certainly not a problem when dealing with tech enthusiasts who know what, when and where to touch to avoid messing things up. But when you're dealing with getting a phone into the hands of ordinary people, that isn't going to fly because all of those people will at some point start mucking around inside and then expect tech support when they mess up.

For mainstream adoption, the linux kernel must and the desktop environment must be at least somewhat locked down.

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

We have immutable distributions already, that is something that isn't a problem. It's replacing those pesky proprietary blobs used to talk to the hardware that is a headache.

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

Between capabilities, namespaces, control groups, mandatory access control (AppArmor etc) and other mechanisms, I think there are plenty of ways to reduce user access to any part of the system.

[–] primal_buddhist@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Too many bits of a smartphone are proprietary hardware without open drivers.

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

My hopes and my expectations could not be more at odds with each other, and the only thing I know for sure is that one of them will be smashed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 139 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (7 children)

I won't hold my breath, but it's sorely needed, so, we can hope.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›