this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
456 points (99.8% liked)

Open Source

41185 readers
983 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The project, developed in partnership with veteran free software developer Rob Savoye, aims to create a fully free and open mobile platform, from the firmware to the operating system.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Patariki@feddit.nl 13 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I salute the early adopters who will suffer all the inconveniences of startups so the wider public can enjoy a non-corporate phone in the future. o7

[–] schema@lemmy.world 2 points 4 minutes ago

I'm looking forward to get one of these just to play around with it, and maybe making some custom stuff for it.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 2 points 6 minutes ago

As soon as my current phone is paid off I am going to get this. No more fucking Spyware up the ass.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 20 points 3 hours ago

I hope they can pull this off because we really need this.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 16 points 4 hours ago

Oooh, I wonder if they're going to pursue a free phone based on Risc-V. It's a longshot but if they pull that off, it'd be like feeding two birds with one scone.

[–] Ultraword@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 hours ago

I really hope this is super based

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Why would anyone think that FSF is capable of releasing a unique and good device? It's gonna be a bog-standard Android device with some software modified/removed.

Might be ok for some people still though. Also I'll be happy to be wrong about my cynicism.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 minutes ago

It’s gonna be a bog-standard Android device with some software modified/removed.

Really? That would be heavily antithetical to everything they do. I expect it would be a Linux distro (like PostmarketOS) with some blobs removed etc.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Just because it's a libre phone, doesn't mean it's necessarily a linux phone. Or at least any more so than Android is a linux phone because it uses a heavily modified (almost unrecognizable) linux kernel.

There's nothing in the article that says they're just going to use a mainline linux kernel and throw a touch optimized version of some existing desktop on it (ubuntu touch, etc...)

Heck, they could be meaning that they're planning on making their own heavily modified kernel for their very own OS so as to skip all of the trouble that trying to make mainline linux into a handheld device has been so far. (similar to I believe how SailfishOS is doing it)

[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

Why couldn't they just use usual Linux for that? Why a modified kernel? Is Linux as is not suitable for a phone?

Can't they just, idk, make a distro? Maybe from scratch? Pop!_OS is working on COSMIC. Can't they have their Linux-based OS, perhaps with its own things as needed, such as a phone-optimised DE? Or whatever the phone equivalent of a DESKTOP environment would be. A Mobile Environment, perhaps

If my laptop had touch screen with no other method of input built in, and were way smaller, could it not run Linux? Or is that different altogether?

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

My hopes and my expectations could not be more at odds with each other, and the only thing I know for sure is that one of them will be smashed.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

As they would say: keep your hopes up and your expectation low to the ground

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 21 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Linux mobile phones are the fusion power of the FOSS world, always right around the corner.

All the pieces are there, but none of them work together smoothly enough to be functional for anybody except the most hardcore FOSS enthusiasts.

When Proton started, it was kind of a joke, killed the Steam Machine idea in large part because the game compatibility was so limited. A decade later, we have a multi billion dollar handheld PC market lead by the Steam Deck, a Linux handheld that can play tens of thousands of Windows games without issue, in some cases with better performance than their native platform.

So it's certainly possible for things to completely change, but we need a big player or consortium of players to unite with a shared goal of getting a Linux Phone to the state where it's genuinely able to replace a traditional Android or Apple phone.

I'm very cautiously optimistic, I think it would come together much faster than Proton did for Linux gaming, but again, there needs to be a really heavy push into a singular device to start off. Like how the Steam Deck was, it allowed devs to have a singular platform to target for compatibility. Then, as the platform matures, competitors & innovators can enter the market and expand options, like how now there are multiple distros with builds for handhelds, like Bazzite, Nobara, and CachyOS.

[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

At this point I would not be surprised if steam built on top of the deck idea and the support it already provides for fairly responsive and configurable inputs, touch screen included, to launch a steam phone or something.

I mean deck isn’t all that far from having such a device. For the actual phone network stack they would likely just partner up with someone already in the space.

They’ve already had to tackle powering a lightweight portable device with a touch screen and adapting the UX for a small screen and non-kbd input. They’ve already established they can source parts and mass produce a competively priced device.

But realistically I can’t see it being that much better than the recent Linux phone offerings.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 56 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I want a Linux phone so bad that I refuse to think about what it would be like because i'd be upset afterwards.

[–] fleg@szmer.info 2 points 2 hours ago

I have an original PinePhone. The phone itself is horribly outdated and slow, but the software itself (Phosh+Gnome) is suprisingly okay. Given a good enough phone (as in hardware) I can see myself actually using it and not being annoyed more than I was with early Androids.

Unfortunately what I understand is that FSFE doesn't intend to do hardware, only software platform, so I wonder whether they'll come up with anything interesting.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 98 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

I won't hold my breath, but it's sorely needed, so, we can hope.

[–] Maybelline@lemmy.zip 65 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

That's funny. I can't hold my width.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Sometimes I can’t hold my ~~heigdth~~ depth.

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

You are all out of line

[–] Redkey@programming.dev 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Some people can hold their length, but only in private.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Just ask your mom

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

You can hold my girth

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

As long as y'all maintain your altitude.

And avoid getting raptured. Otherwise we'll hear no end of your Arch installs.

[–] hereforawhile@lemmy.ml 29 points 10 hours ago
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago

I can't find any links to the project itself, only to announcements about the project. Anybody have anything more concrete? How far along is this project?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Please god, help me find my keys! Tell St. Anthony I need my keys!

Also could you make this Foss phone be real and reasonably priced below the cost of a gaming PC?

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

Found them! Where's my Linux phone?

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 22 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I'd rather see a stable OS and ecosystem for good, Free apps that we can flash onto existing devices. I'm quite happy with my Fairphone (repairable! modular! ethical!) and we know that building and marketing a device is painfully expensive.

Let's make Debian or Arch just work on most phones instead of trying to compete in a saturated market.

[–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 1 points 21 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

There isn't much concrete information, but my guess is that OS/ecosystem is exactly what this project is, and that they are not talking about physical hardware. Specially considering that they are putting the emphasis on free software (not hardware) and they are involving a software developer. Making a phone's hardware free would be an entirely different beast.

In the afternoon, FSF executive director Zoë Kooyman announced an exciting new project: Librephone.

Librephone is a new initiative by the FSF to bring full computing freedom to mobile computing environments. The LibrePhone Project is a partnership with Rob Savoye, a developer who has worked on free software (including the GNU toolchain) since the 1980s. "Since mobile phone computing is now so ubiquitous, we're very excited about LibrePhone and think it has the potential to bring software freedom to many more users all over the world."

From the official FSF post about the event.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How old is your oldest working fairphone? I’ve heard too many bad things about software atrophy to declare it a success yet.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm using a Fairphone 4, which is 4 years old at this point (October 2021) and I'm still quite happy with it, but I owned the Fairphone 1 and 2 as well.

In terms of software atrophy, they do offer support for your device for 5 years, which is better than most, and because of its open nature, it's generally well supported by alternatives like Lineage or Calyx, but yeah, I'm still on Android 13. While I still get regular security patches and haven't really had a need for an upgrade, there's no denying that the FP4 is behind.

Of course, it's also easily repairable, supports an SD card and replaceable battery, so that's a tradeoff I'm happy with.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Do phone calls and RCS work 100% of the time? (I really hope the answer is “yes” because I really want to get out of the closed source ecosystem.)

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm afraid I have no idea what an RCS is, but maybe that's a network/region specific thing? I'm in the UK using GiffGaff (O₂) and the phone, SMS, and data works exactly as well as everyone else's... which is to say perfectly in most places and sporadically on the train due to the dead zones on the route.

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Let's make Debian or Arch just work

Wonder why that's extremely rare on ARM devices, especially those with modems, and rarely works beyond proof of concepts on some very specific devices? Its not like you're the first to have this idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lennee@lemmy.world 51 points 12 hours ago

gimme gimme

[–] unexpected@forum.guncadindex.com 42 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I'm celebrating!

As a linux phone guy this is good news. Any more pushing towards a more solid linux phone environment is a big plus.

[–] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago

I’m not holding my breath either hence “Hurd” project be amazing if this will be faster than 20 years. I’m hopeful at least.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 27 points 11 hours ago

Honestly as long as they can fucking get something moderately priced that supports VOLTE and a decent camera I’ll buy it

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 6 points 9 hours ago

I'll use my de-Googled and update-blocked S23 until it's physically unable to boot up, and hopefully by then I'll find something that can run this OS, assuming it's ready

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 19 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

Let's hope this lights a fire under Google's ass too, so everyone can have free and open phones.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

F-droid maybe we'll find a new good home then?

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

F-droid for Waydroid enabled Linux phones?

  • small userbase
  • high resource usage

F-droid for AOSP Android

  • still dependant on Google

Honestly, I prefer flatpaks with all the drawbacks, give me 100% freedom while providing Android like comfort... Like the new xdg permissions portal.

If the price is no good maps or banking apps, I'll gladly pay it. I just wish the graphene team worked on linux instead.

load more comments
view more: next ›