IIRC, mongolian mounted archers wore no armor opting instead for speed and agility.
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
History
1535 readers
3 users here now
Welcome to c/History @ Mander.xyz!
Notice Board
- 2023-07-01: We are looking for mods. Send a dm to @fossilesque@mander.xyz if interested! This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.
Work in progress...
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
Similar Communities
- !openscience@lemmy.ml
- !historymemes@lemmy.ml
- !history@lemmy.world
- !history@lemmygrad.ml
- !fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world
Sister Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- !anthropology@mander.xyz
- !microbiology@mander.xyz
- !biodiversity@mander.xyz
- !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
- !palaeontology@mander.xyz
Plants & Gardening
Physical Sciences
Humanities and Social Sciences
- !archaeology@mander.xyz
- !cooking@mander.xyz
- !folklore@mander.xyz
- !history@mander.xyz
- !old_maps@mander.xyz
Memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Do battlecruisers count?
Maybe those medieval militaries that relied heavily on foot archers, which were generally commoners/peasants who were very lightly armored? e.g. the English. The rest of their armies were more standard, but when armored enemy melee fighters/riders broke through the line, those archers were proper fucked.
Arguably most WW1 armies. They figured out early how to defend against armies of the era, but not how to beat those defenses and thus the war dragged on for years. Fortified stationary machine guns are devastating defensive weapons but you're not conquering anything with that.