("mad dental science": Silverbook is the mouth bacteria instead of brushing your teeth guy)
Reinforcing my belief that you can find someone who holds any opinion it's possible to hold, no matter how dumb it is
Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.
AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)
This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.
[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]
See our twin at Reddit
("mad dental science": Silverbook is the mouth bacteria instead of brushing your teeth guy)
Reinforcing my belief that you can find someone who holds any opinion it's possible to hold, no matter how dumb it is
Feeding the output of the AI back into itself? Nothing could possibly go wrong with that!
Dont worry, other Scott (no the other other one), is saying it will not be a problem.
Ironic. Every AI who would be worthy of that name, would also be capable of understanding the context of "AI-negativity" and thus clearly not "hyperstition itself into existence".
This is fucking stupid. And now my day is ruined because I got annoyed thinking about this idea.