701

• Steve Jobs faked full signal strength and swapped devices during the first iPhone demo due to fragile prototypes and bug-riddled software.

• Engineers got drunk during the presentation to calm their nerves.

• Despite the challenges, Jobs successfully completed the 90-minute demonstration without any noticeable issues.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 179 points 1 year ago

This is old news, and perfectly normal for stage work.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 173 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know it's already normalized, but...

Maybe it's just me, but maybe we shouldn't be normalizing outright deceiving people when you're selling a product.

How is that not false advertising? Why should companies be allowed to magic up a fake example of their product actually working, and sell that to customers, when the real product doesn't actually work yet?

Just because it's "perfectly normal" doesn't make it okay to peddle propaganda and lie to people for profit.

It's like the Tesla "robot" that was clearly a person in a weird suit. Why are they allowed to advertise things that functionally don't exist? Why are they allowed to sell unfinished products with promise they may one day be finished (cough full self driving cough)?

I mean holy fuck it's like Beeper offering paid access to a service that allows Android and PC users to use iMessage, but Apple keeps breaking each new iteration every few days... Like there was no long-term plan to make sure that the service would work long-term before asking people to pay for it.

It's all fucking bonkers, man. We've just allowed snake-oil salesmen to rule the roost. The bigger the lie, the bigger the profit.

[-] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

Oh, I agree with you! And I'm sure we can have this discussion about almost any current product launch, too.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 25 points 1 year ago

How is that not false advertising? Why should companies be allowed to magic up a fake example of their product actually working, and sell that to customers, when the real product doesn’t actually work yet?

If when they ship the actual thing to the customer it's not like they claimed then it's fraud (or "false advertising" which is the lenient version).

Strictly for presentation ahead of time I think it's borderline. Negative hype can kill a product that could have been good. Sure, complete honesty would be ideal, but if you say "well it sucks right now but we promise it will be ok when you buy it", not many people would rush to order one. Many good products never made it to market because of insufficiently good perception. On the flip side, creating positive hype out of smoke and mirrors can be used to kill a competitor's product for no good reason, so it's not quite ok either.

[-] 1847953620@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Negative hype can kill a product that could have been good.

Positive false hype can deceive people into wasting money.

Sure, complete honesty would be ideal, but if you say "well it sucks right now but we promise it will be ok when you buy it", not many people would rush to order one.

And they shouldn't. It's just another way of saying "people acting rationally based on truthful information"

Many good products never made it to market because of insufficiently good perception.

That should be a separate issue. It's not the only available path, just one often taken because it's the most forgiving of shoddy business practices, doesn't justify its existence, either.

On the flip side, creating positive hype out of smoke and mirrors can be used to kill a competitor's product for no good reason, so it's not quite ok either.

I think people are starting to realize the depth of corporate deception and bad-faith practices and how that affects everyone at large, and so they're rightly tired of them and trying to reset it all back to simple, effective, and fair ethical standards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 4grams@awful.systems 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree, but what’s more, I am not trying to defend the behavior of Jobs here. But…to me anyway there is a material difference between say this, where the product did live up to the demo ultimately. In this case the demo was done on pre-release versions and so problems were expected and planned for.

Contrast this with say the cyber truck launch. Similar situation but 1. they failed to properly anticipate and plan for failure (broken window?) and 2. they made promises about wishes and desires, because the delivered product thus far does not live up to the promises.

The whole behavior is shitty to be sure, but I’d be ok going back to demos about planned yet achievable and deliverable features.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 17 points 1 year ago

Eh I think it's fine because they weren't selling the public engineering samples, they were selling finished devices. As long as the product they sold worked as shown on stage, that's fine.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

I had to look up the robot one. I think they tried to get away with it actually being the robot, but since everyone saw through it, they went another route. lmao. It was supposed to be here end of last year too, where is it?

https://www.autoweek.com/news/technology/a37359183/tesla-robot-human-in-spandex/

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe a demo should be just that; not a magic show. Normalizing deception for profit doesn’t seem like a healthy thing for anyone, but that’s only because I** didn’t own any stock in apple back then. Edit: Yes, I am still salty about the purchasing Starfield also

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago

And look where he is now. Dead. Lesson learned.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 104 points 1 year ago

Calling the stage units prototypes is being nice. The reality was that at that point the iPhone had barely gotten to a proof of concept stage. Months before this event, the developers were still using a giant desktop tower to simulate the phone's hardware.

That the photos of the phone were real and not concept art, that the stage units weren't just unusable rubber dummies was a magic trick itself.

When the developers revealed years later that the iPhone presentation (just the presentation, not even the actual launch) was a make or break moment for the company, they absolutely were not kidding.

And then they went from "should not even be working" test units to fully functional production units in six months!

Whatever your opinion of Jobs or Apple, credit where credit is due.

[-] nyar@lemmy.world 95 points 1 year ago

To the engineers.

[-] 1847953620@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jobs: Ass

Apple: Ass

Engineers: overworked

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 90 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not saying all these necessarily apply to Steve jobs but I really hate how capitalism gratifies liars, fakers, cheaters, egomaniacs, narcissists, psychopaths and selfish exploiters in general.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

You say that like there’s a single system in the history of the world which doesn’t. Capitalism isn’t novel with regard to humans taking advantage of one another.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] danielfgom@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago

This is old news. We all know this. These were prototypes and still buggy but Steve knew he had to present it first, ASAP, to the public to earn and keep the excitement.

It was a gamble they worked. People were super exited and for months the anticipation built resulting in a strong launch with massive sales.

Even to this day, it's that presentation they keeps the fans buying.

load more comments (10 replies)

Every tech demo ever is fake, with the possible exception of the original Cybertruck demo, but I suspect even that one just wasn’t faked very well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] samus7070@programming.dev 53 points 1 year ago

People laughed their assess off at Bill Gates’s epic failed demo of usb on windows 95. Live on stage he plugged in a peripheral and the machine blue screened. No way in hell would Jobs have taken that risk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

This article is terribly written and seems to repeat itself a bit. Almost seems like it was written by a GPT system.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Odds are, it was.

[-] rubythulhu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 year ago

so it was like every demo ever? k

[-] Dra@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 year ago

This is how all demos used to be. If the author/publisher of the ai prompt wasnt born less than 20 years ago they would know this

Used to be?

Even as early as a few years ago, game demos at E3 were extremely controlled environments to avoid the journalist player crashing the game.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Find a demo that Apple/Jobs didn't fake. He was infamous for this shit.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most top level shit is.

While it's a mistake to fake what you can't build (I have cautionary tales about folks that did that), faking what you can and will build in order to build momentum to launch is not as uncommon as people might think.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago

Still more honest than some game trailers. 😂

[-] KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space 14 points 1 year ago

"You'll cum within 40 seconds by using this iPhone."

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 41 points 1 year ago

"Demo magic", it's everywhere. Always has been, always will be.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Hey... at least the ruse worked...

[-] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

That was on him for going out the script. He could have made a cult like Apple.

Instead he did whatever the hell this is

[-] 4z01235@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Somehow it still has a cult like Apple

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

i think Tesla's and Elons cult is gonna be much different, he has succesfully alienated most of the so called "woke liberal" crowd with his fascists free speech absolutist sex offender shit, and then right wingers wont purchase his shit because they deny climate change and want their gas guzzlers, so he is stuck with the niche, crypto fun tech bros to worship him and his shitty "cars"

And he elegantly timef his shit to alienate his main purchase demographics to be at the time when the big automakers start coming out with their own offerings

Tesla will be a charging provider at best in a decade if they survive all the class action lawsuits over his fake claims that is

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I love this bumper sticker:

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SapphironZA 38 points 1 year ago

You got to say he was a master bullshitter, but he had some miracle workers engineers that made it happen.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

honestly selling a product based on a prototype is really common

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] msbeta1421@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Slow down your thinking and consider this: why would any practical person fully develop something without getting market feedback and understanding demand?

This is by the book “Preto-typing”. You can frame it as lying, but the reality is Apple had faith that all of the “faked” features in the demonstration would be fully developed before launch.

IBM did something similar before voice-to-text existed. They faked the technology during market research and discovered that people didn’t enjoy speaking to their computer as much as initially thought. It showed them that they could better invest that money elsewhere.

It would make zero sense and be a foolish use of capital to fully develop a product that complex and expensive without understanding market preferences.

This is a non-story, rage-bait headline.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why is this published now as news when every one of these anecdotes was published over a decade ago? This story leaves out all the better juicy details.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

And then when you have issues with this kind of stuff when your own managers do it, they'll just turn to you and say, "you don't understand how business works"

You're right, yes, business is a field made for liars.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 16 points 1 year ago

Had this on Friday.

  • Boss: Have we hit the milestone?
  • Me: No, our performance is low and we don't know why? We need to analyse it.
  • Boss: ...but we've done what we said we'd do. We shouldn't beat ourselves up over some metric. I think we've should say we've made it.

Net result is that we've pushed a major problem into the next phase without giving ourselves more time to do anything about it. ...and people wonder why projects are "late" at the last moment.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
701 points (91.1% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
3157 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS