this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
82 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

72784 readers
3547 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Great as if we needed more inefficient communication satellite systems made by tech illiterate billionaires, resulting in no benefit for anyone and ultimately only more garbage in orbit

Strange how that seems to be a common theme huh

[–] m13@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You’re right. This kind of technology might be cool if we lived in a egalitarian world where the technology was a benefit for all humans and built thoughtfully.

Instead we live in an increasingly fascist hellworld where this shit is just going to be one of many competing projects by tech overlords who are just going to pollute our world with more garbage.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

If it was NASA building a global Internet satellite network, I'd be all for it.

Instead it's these two douchebags.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

And a huge disruption of astronomical research.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

On one hand, the emergence of these technologies is pretty exciting from an evolution standpoint, and it points to the possibility of a bright future for humanity. On the other, unfortunately, most of these developments will be gatekept by billionaires with the implicit purpose of enriching the select few.

Maybe one day we'll all be able to benefit equilaterally.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I don't disagree with your general point, but "tech illiterate"?

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Margorie Taylor Greene sees the basis for a new conspiracy theory!

[–] jagungal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Until Bezos buys her too

[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Yay. More space junk.

[–] Rosco@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We're so fucked when Kessler syndrome will be in full effect.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 2 points 2 years ago

Not in LEO. There's a reason starlink is losing dozens of satellites every month