Scary that the RNC Chairwoman was on the call on Trump’s side.
And offered lawyers for after the illegal acts!
You say scary, I say utterly predictable that she would be involved and nice to have proof so that they can flip her or indict her too.
"I move to dismiss this evidence your honor."
"why?"
"it's devastating to my case!"
Clearly this is sleepy Joe trying to make Trump look bad.
/s just in case
At one point, there was a QAnon conspiracy theory that said that Trump really didn't leave the White House. He got quick plastic surgery to look like Joe Biden and was sworn in again so he was still President. This was between when he "appeared to leave" and before anyone saw him post-inauguration. And, yes, people believed it even though it's completely idiotic. (I'm not going to get into debunking it because there's just SO MUCH wrong with it )
How long until the Q/MAGA folks start insisting that Biden is secretly a master vocal impersonator and that it was actually Biden doing a Trump impression to get Trump in trouble?
The more they come to lemmy, the more it’s needed.
I block assholes immediately on deciding they aren't someone I will ever benefit from interacting with. Their politics doesn't matter as much to me as their assholery, but there is a strong correlation.
Seems like another state racketeering case incoming.
And probably enough evidence to flip Ronna Romney or indict her as an accessory if not an actual conspirator.
More evidence for Jack. The guy is swimming in evidence
It’s part of Trump’s evil plan to bury lawyers in admissible evidence to delay case resolution until Republicans can steal the next election for him.
If he records his crimes, thinking it's one more thing he can sell, is that more the grifter or the narcissist showing?
It's both and the idiot. Mostly the idiot.
It was apparent when that Georgia recording came out that he must have been calling all over the place making these unsubtle "suggestions" to various state officials. It was just a matter of who decided to grab a recording and hold onto it to cover their own asses. I think everyone involved knew full well that even having the conversation was crossing all kinds of lines, and impossible to defend.
Ahh yes the crimes he committed in Michigan. Hard to keep track.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News