746
if you're a Conservative, little kids just don't work hard enough to deserve food
These clowns better be happy i am not a billionaire. I’d be sending a check to every damn household with kids in the state.
Billionaires don't spend their money. If they did, they wouldn't be billionaires.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Yeah right
load more comments
(1 replies)
$120m is all you need to give that same $40 to literally everyone in her state each month.
Article says that the program is estimated to cost Iowa $2,2 million, the rest covered on a federal level.
They can't find 2,2 million.
load more comments
(1 replies)
She's right all those small subsidies aren't going to fix anything it's just going to complicate the system. Minimum wage should be raised
load more comments
(1 replies)
Oh, but it is. It's proven in the 12th economy of the world, why one state of the first economy of the world couldn't sustain it?
Loading them up on a bunch of HFCS from those Iowa corn fields will be great for them though I'm sure...
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Iowa will not participate this summer in a federal program that gives $40 per month to each child in a low-income family to help with food costs while school is out, state officials have announced.
“Federal COVID-era cash benefit programs are not sustainable and don’t provide long-term solutions for the issues impacting children and families.
An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,” Iowa Republican Gov.
Some state lawmakers, including Democratic Sen. Izaah Knox of Des Moines, quickly voiced their opposition to the decision.
“It’s extremely disappointing that the Reynolds administration is planning to reject federal money that could put food on the table for hungry Iowa kids,” Knox said in a statement.
States, territories and eligible tribal nations have until Jan. 1 to notify the Department of Agriculture of their intent to participate in the program this summer.
The original article contains 520 words, the summary contains 149 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
extremely disappointing
Honestly, I don't get this. Call a spade a spade. Use words like "absolutely unconscionable". Use "inexcusable". Use words that get the gravity across of just how asinine and ABSOLUTELY deadly this will be. Mark my words, despite whatever safety nets exist in the state of IA, kids will starve to death because of this. Make a statement saying EXACTLY that, and point out that the blood will be on Governor Reynolds' hands.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Another example of "once they're out of the womb, fuck 'em". Disgusting.
Iowa is a barren field devoid of intellectualism so OF COURSE the election hinges on it
What a poverty state, I’d he embarrassed if I lived in a place that had so many poors or so little money that that’s not affordable
You know what else does nothing for kids? Kim Reynolds. She’s, an arrogant, hypocritical, and ignorant douche baby.
Quick, somebody call "Moms for Liberty" and get this fixed!
oh....
I see. Right. OK then, never mind.
Her fucking salary and expenses are not sustainable.
Too bad those kids aren't Fetuses. Then Republicans might actually CARE about them!
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
746 points (98.4% liked)
politics
19090 readers
3985 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS