84
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Chinese President Xi Jinping said China would “surely be reunified” with Taiwan during his televised New Year’s address, renewing Beijing’s threats to take over the self-ruled island, which it considers its own.

Taiwan split from China amid civil war in 1949, but Beijing continues to regard the island of 23 million with its high-tech economy as Chinese territory and has been ramping up its threat to achieve that by military force if necessary.

“China will surely be reunified, and all Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait should be bound by a common sense of purpose,” Xi said in his annual address, according to the official Xinhua News Agency.

China has described Taiwan’s Jan. 13 presidential and parliamentary elections as a choice between war and peace.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Vilian@lemmy.ca 25 points 10 months ago

So taiwan gonna overthrow the rebels that command huge portions of his territories?, right?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

It's about time West Taiwan got reined in.

[-] stevehobbes@lemy.lol 7 points 10 months ago

Taiwan numba 1

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

This is not news. This has been China's policy since 1949. I don't listen to the New Year's addresses, but I would be very surprised if this was the first or even one of the first times this has been said during that address.

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I wouldn't put it past Pooh Bear. He's been steadily ramping up. Much of the sentiment hinges on how the other dictator Poo(tin) plays out vis-a-vis Ukraine.

If poo-stinky Trump steals it again, it's highly likely that will embolden Pooh Bear to make a military move.

Much in the same way pootin wants to get the ussr back together for sentimental value, pooh bear obviously feels the same.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 10 points 10 months ago

It'll be 75 years this year, "dude I don't think they're that into you!" =(

At this point unless you're playing the "look I'm a dictator" angle, why bother? There is also a phrase I think fits this well, "shit or get off the pot". Also, "don't call me Shirley".

[-] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Look at his tiny little bear smug

[-] yournamehere@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

when exactly were they unified in the first place?

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

small men make big promises

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
84 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3517 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS