419

CBC says killing of 22,600 Palestinians doesn’t merit terms ‘murderous,’ ‘brutal’ (breachmedia.ca)

submitted 10 months ago by bojaber@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world

91 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 80 points 10 months ago

how about the terms 'ethnic cleansing,' 'genocide' ?

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 46 points 10 months ago

I'm quite partial to 'crimes against humanity'

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

'slaughtering innocent civilians'

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 74 points 10 months ago

I'll go ahead and type what they mean.

NRPI - No Real Person Involved

It's the most disgusting but most honest corporate term I have ever seen. Palestinians aren't real to these people. They are clumped together into "casualties" and maybe, if they are lucky, "civilian casualties". How many "non-real person" deaths does it take to force people to acknowledge this genocide?

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 57 points 10 months ago

Watching an MSF volunteer doctor describe WCNSF while the interviewer sat mute and emotionless was telling.

There's an acronym that's unique to the Gaza Strip, it's WCNSF - wounded child, no surviving family - and it's not used infrequently

She almost broke down mid sentence, the host was ready to move on to the next segment piece of the broadcast…

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 months ago

Multiple doctors have been vocal about this disgusting new acronym.

History is not going to look at Israel well. They done fucked up bad and it's gonna catch up to them.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 57 points 10 months ago

Bombs dropped from thousands of feet and artillery shells lofted into Gaza from kilometers away result in death and destruction on a massive scale, but it is carried out remotely. The deadly results are unseen by those who caused them and the source unseen by those [who] suffer and die.

It’s a different kind of event and is described differently as ‘intensive,’ ‘unrelenting,’ and ‘punishing,’ raining death and destruction on one of the most densely populated places on earth…They are different stories, and we have tried to describe both accurately and vividly.

It's not "murderous" if it's done from far away, apparently. Hitler didn't personally see the Jews he sent to the death camps so he wasn't "murderous" he was just "unrelenting" and "intensive." Aww he was just a hard worker then, bless his cotton socks.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago

Why do people keep calling revenge "defense"?

Israel had a chance to defend itself. It failed horribly. Now it gets to massacre civilians?

What the fuck?

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's like when the Nazis were attacked by the French Resistance in Occupied France and then went to some village and killed 10 random villagers for each dead German as reprisal.

The main difference here is that the total ratio is already pass the 20-to-1 mark and 10-to-1 is the ratio of Palestinian children murdered by the Israel military for each Israeli murdered by Hamas.

[-] erranto@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I call it racism

There have been more civilians killed in the latest atrocities by the Israelis in Gaza in only three months than the number of all Ukrainian civilians dead in almost 2 years. but they haven't spared one bad word of the dictionary in describing Putin's war in Ukraine while banning their journalists from describing Israel's atrocities as brutal.

If this isn't racism and viewing one race more worthy of humanity and empathy than another, than I don't know what it could be, cause maybe we need a better word to describe both "racism + hypocrisy "

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not merelly racism, but the cold, extreme, violent kind of racism practiced by the Nazis.

Even the KKK in a country of 350 million people did not manage to murder so many of those they deemed "lesser" in decades as the Israelis are doing to those they call "human animals" in a few months.

I did not at all thought like this when all this started, but by now all I see is the disgusting parallel with how the Nazis thought and, worse, how they acted, and can only conclude that those at this point excusing, whitewashing or even supporting the actions of the State Of Israel are Nazi-lovers.

At this point this shit has transcended the racism of Appartheid and the "mild" style of Fascism in places like Italy, and has reached the kind of ultra-racist violent Fascism of the Nazis.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 36 points 10 months ago

That's 1.1% of Gaza's population killed in just 3 month!

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Israel has killed more civilians in 2 months than Russia has killed in 2 years.

Let that sink in.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 10 months ago

I think worse is all the killings happening that barely get reported at all.

Sudan? Hundreds of thousands of deaths. Bunch of black people killing other black people. No clicks or views in that. Ongoing, incidentally.

Jews and Muslims killing each other? Everyone seems to love picking a side there.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

We're gonna find more than that died due to the nightmarish health and sanitation conditions caused by. IDF bombing hospitals, if what I've heard about the outbreak of dysentery and hepatitis is right.

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Big shoutout to to the IDF for killing the entire family of this 12 year old girl, and blowing her leg off in an airstrike.

And then when she was in the hospital the IDF shot at the hospital and blew her head off with a tank shell.

The one that Genocide Joe just bypassed congress for to send more to israel.

Not brutal though.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

Oh, really?

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Semantics. It's genocide then. Or some other more technical term. There's a word for it, who cares? Everyone knows what we mean. And that's the point of words. To covey a meaning from one mind to another.

If you want to play the semantics game and abolish in-context definitions of words, then abolish all slang and idioms too.

[-] Jumpinship@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

it's only murder if it's a bunch of crows, silly.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

CBC are toadying sycophants, this surprises nobody. I don't even know why people pay attention to them, they're irrelevant.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024

419 points (92.8% liked)

World News

38979 readers

2473 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.