96
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 76 points 8 months ago

This is a non-story with a purposefully misleading headline. There's absolutely nothing noteworthy about a candidate saying that their opponent is going to lose an upcoming debate, regardless of who said it or what party they're with.

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 21 points 8 months ago

It's not like any of them can "win" the debate. These stopped being actual debates back when Kennedy showed up on color TV. A Republican hasn't made a salient point in front of a camera since McCain gave Congress his thumbs down and prevented them from nuking Obamacare. There used to be points and scoring but modern times it all comes down to who looks best in whatever 1.2 seconds of video trends best on tik tok.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago

Former candidate.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It sounds like he was talking about the primary, not the debate. And he's dropping out, so she's not his opponent. I don't care much about what Christie says, but it's newsworthy when a former contender makes a statement about the remaining contenders.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

Is it though?

Sounds more like the guy who gets kicked out of the only clique that tolerated them in school and tells everyone else they suck in response. "Loser claims other people losers on his way out".

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Except that he didn't say everyone else sucks, he single out one of the three remaining relevant candidates.

[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

Maybe I'm wrong but it seems someone who has been in politics that long knows the mic is always hot. He meant for it to be heard.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 19 points 8 months ago

He's not wrong, he's just an asshole.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 7 points 8 months ago

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 16 points 8 months ago

Ah yes, Chris Christie, well-known for his excellent political acumen. /s

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

He's potentially best known for debating. He ended Marco Rubio's campaign back in 2016. And he is only running now because he wanted to try to do the same thing to Trump.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

It's a race to see who gets to lose to Trump by 30-40 points.

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

He's often right when he's being critical of Republicans. My grampa is really good at catching fish in the seafood aisle of the grocery store.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 5 points 8 months ago

I love that analogy. The form is so easy to reuse. It's like dancing in a chair!

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Exactly. Christie can tell a piece of crap because he is a piece of crap.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago

Might be the only thing i'll ever agree with Chris Christie on.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I mean, the only reason any of the other candidates are in the race was on the off-chance that somehow Trump dropped out due to his ongoing legal problems OR to run for Trump's VP pick. Christie and Pence were never getting that slot anyways. As long as the others don't disparage Trump during the race, it's a toss-up between them, though given Trump's birther remarks about Haley recently, she's likely out too.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

He meant like bacon?

[-] autotldr 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Chris Christie was caught on a hot mic Wednesday night, appearing to say that Nikki Haley was going to get "smoked" in the Republican presidential race.

Christie's comments came while he was offstage before his event in Windham, N.H., where he announced that he was dropping his presidential bid.

A source familiar told NBC News that the Florida governor called Christie earlier today — after hearing rumors that he would be dropping out — and said that regardless of his decision, he appreciated his role in the race.

The source also said Christie went after Haley pretty hard in the conversation, calling her a joke and saying that she has performed terribly and is not up to the task.

Former President Donald Trump's campaign reveled in the hot mic moment, posting the audio on his Truth Social account and tweeting about it.

Voters have a clear choice in this election: the chaos and drama of the past or a new generation of conservative leadership.


The original article contains 310 words, the summary contains 164 words. Saved 47%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Why are you spreading this nonsense? Who cares what Chris Christie says?

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Even CNN is reporting on it...

[-] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago

Now show the picture of you taking this picture of CNN on your phone.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

Ah, if a 24 hour news channel decided it must have airtime, then it must be important!

It's just more inflammatory bullshit that gets them better viewership.

[-] squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

That's cool and all, but again: who cares about him?

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
96 points (87.5% liked)

politics

18904 readers
2983 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS