106
submitted 10 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

This is straight-from-Hitler genocide inciting rhetoric. And 82% of Republicans agree

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

Jesus Fucking Christ, who are these asshole Democrats and Independents?

[-] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I like to bear in mind the lizardman's constant when reading about polls like this. Never underestimate people's desire to fuck with data, sometimes just because they think it's funny.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

It’s a poll. So, that means they only called people they wanted to call.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

When you do it right, there's an effort to make sure you have an equal chance of talking to everybody in the country. I have no reason to believe that this was not attempted here

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Do you wait for evidence of wrong doing before you cast doubt on what you read in the media?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

Poll isn't far off other evidence, and sponsored by a pair of reasonably reputable outlets, so I'm not not very inclined go suspect malfeasance

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago
[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago

Long history of Americans supporting this kind of hate

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Well, I can’t argue with that.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

First of all it's not half, it's 45%, which is the magical number of MAGA voters, some of which do identify as Dems and Independents but mostly as Republicans, so this makes sense as but holds true with the established patterns. Also with that said 55% of Americans most likely find this kind of rhetoric offensive and backwards.

With that said, 45% is still far too high, we need better education in America, but we also need to make it easier for folks to leave their insular rural areas to get away from their ignorant bigoted communities.

[-] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago

The inverse of 45% is 55%.

[-] Poggervania@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Ackshually, it’s the complement - 45% is the main collection of the set of US voters we’re looking at, so the other 55% would be the rest of the set 🤓

But I digress - that is still a frightening amount of people who believe in the whole core belief of Nazism.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The inverse of 45% is 100/45, approximately 2.22

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

What if I told you you shouldn't be surprised. January 6th, wasn't even the first plotted coup attempt Republicans had worked on. They've been at this for nearly 100 years. Originally intending to overthrow the United States government. At roughly a similar time Hitler initially tried to overthrow the German government.

One of the few reasons they didn't is a largely unsung American patriot named Smedley Butler. Who warned FDR about the plot. FDR even though he was one of our greatest presidents of the last century and did a lot of good. Ended up managing to shit the bed on this. Instead of calling out the fascists, rooting them out and prosecuting/locking them up. Cut a deal with them. In order to temporarily get new deal policies passed. Only to have the son and grandson of the man they most likely intended to install as America's fascist dictator become presidents. The son who himself was a man in heavy support of American international terrorist activities. Enabled and then pardoned one of the greatest American international terrorists of the 1980s.

We shouldn't be surprised. We've had a century of constant warnings. Trump being the most minor one of all. But somehow the only one most people managed to catch. I blame the whitewashed history we teach in America.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Pretty sure agreeing with Nazis should be enough to have your right to vote revoked.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

Well that's frightening.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Here are the full poll questions for anyone actually interested in data over headlines.

https://www.scribd.com/document/698811992/Cbsnews-20240114-1-SUN-updated

[-] EarWorm@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you! I can't believe that news sites would publish articles like this without a reference link, or even the sample size.

this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
106 points (90.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2950 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS