370

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1328094

Texas state Sen. Roland Gutierrez, since news outlets have a phobia of putting the damn name in the title

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 95 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I do not like that man Ted Cruz, I do not like his far-right views. I do not like his stupid chin, I do not like his smarmy grin. I do not like him with a beard, I do not like him freshly sheared. I do not like Ted Cruz at all, that man Ted Cruz can suck my balls.

I do not like that man Ted Cruz, I do not like him in the news. I do not like what he just said, I do not like his boxy head. I do not like him wearing glasses, I do not like him kissing asses. I wish he’d never get one vote, that man Ted Cruz can lick my scrote.

I do not like that man Ted Cruz, I do not like his backward views. I do not like his stupid suits, I do not like his cowboy boots. I do not like him when he sneezes, I do not like him eating cheeses. I hate to see his dumb face smirking, because his beard looks like a merkin’.

I do not like that man Ted Cruz, I do not like his far-right views. I do not like him in these reeds, I do not like him when he feeds. I do not like him by a wall, I do not like this shit at all. I do not like him as Santa’s elf, that man Ted Cruz can fuck himself.

I do not like that Ted Cruz man, I do not like him shouting klan. I do not like him in a room, I do not like him in Cancún. I do not like him playing ball, I do not like his face at all. I wish he'd lose his cushy job, that man Ted Cruz is a fucking knob.

I do not like that man Ted Cruz, I do not like his shitty views. I do not like him saying ass, I do not like him serving sass. I do not like him in a seat, I do not like him holding meat. I do not like him when he's smooching, I do not like him with Mnuchin. I hate his stupid pronoun bits, that man Ted Cruz is full of shit.

[-] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I tip my hat off to you. that was awesome.

[-] Greensauce@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was a recurring bit on John Oliver’s show. Should be turned into a book though.

https://youtu.be/bV42PgyOFE0

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/bV42PgyOFE0

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wish I had more upvotes to give. I also tip my hat to you, good sir.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 37 points 1 year ago

Someone needs to get rid of That Asshole Ted Cruz. That Asshole Ted Cruz is a real asshole.

[-] Apex_Fail@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago
[-] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure what i just clicked on... mostly because during the last election republican candidates at the state level had legitimate websites that looked... worse.

[-] the_real_monte@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Are you talking about the Ted Cruise that pisses his pants because he likes the warm wet feeling between his legs?

[-] eatmoregreenfood@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Hey let's not kink shame, he's an asshole for other reasons

[-] gonzoleroy@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah like fucking off to Cancun while his constituents froze without power and in many cases, water

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Nope, that's what Cruz did. Texans were suffering and he went on vacation after the issue had begun.

[-] machinaeZER0@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I understood this reference

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 year ago

Please don't pull another "Beto"

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

He fucking killed his campaign with one sentence. If he was running in California, he might have been able to survive. I have no doubt that Beto would be a fine governor, but the DNC should have never even considered running him in TX.

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Gutierrez voted to make Texas a sanctuary state for oil and gas companies. Just another "lesser of two evils".

Source: https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/106951/roland-gutierrez

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, many democrats still love thier oil money.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which you can add on to the list of reasons why two party systems are bullshit.

I vote for people and not against people, though. Corrupt politicians are not politicians I want to vote for.

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Would you want to vote for a corrupt politician, or a corrupt and fascist politician? Yep, that's your choice in the land of the free.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is how you get voter disenfranchisement. Voter shaming isn't a good way to get out the vote en masse; inspiring voters is how you do it.

FDR got elected president 4 times consecutively, with some of the biggest numbers in US history. Republicans had to make term limits to make sure that doesn't happen again because he was so popular.

On the other hand, we got a fascist as president for 4 years because Hillary didn't inspire people (and the DNC rigged the primary against Bernie).

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not voter shaming, I'm just stating the facts. Yes Biden is a shitty choice (imo), but still, I will for vote for his shitty ass anyways. Better than a fascist any day. I'm criticizing the 2-party system, not the voters.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hence "lesser of two evils".

For every voter who begrudgingly votes, there are 4-5 who stay home.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 1 year ago

What was wrong with Beto? Am I out of the loop?

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

He would have been a fine governor, but the reason he fucked up was because he told TX citizens that he'd take their guns away. That's the easiest way to kill a campaign in TX

[-] Realtrain@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

"Hell yes we're going to take your guns" is not the best slogan when running for governor of Texas.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 9 points 1 year ago

Ahh, thank you for the clarity.

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

He's being very anti-gun in a state where there is a strong gun culture. He could've said something like "We need to stop criminals from getting guns", instead, he said something along the lines of "We're coming for all your guns!"

[-] Zaktor@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

People seem to just be assuming the gun control comments were an insurmountable anchor around his neck, but after Uvalde polling put him just down 4 points (43-47) for trust on gun issues. There's a lot more wiggle room in the gun debate, even in Texas, than people think.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but didn't Uvalde vote overwhelmingly for Abbott?

Texas just isn't purple yet

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zorque@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

He is to politics as a glass of milk is to beverages.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Why put the name in the title when they can make more people click? More clicks=more revenue, seems smart to me.

[-] pm_me_your_happiness@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

Texas state Sen. Roland Gutierrez, from San Antonio.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If the headline is any indication, he's more progressive than Allred.

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

the fact that we have to wonder if it's accurate or not.... says a lot about ted cruz.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
370 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4802 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS