1314

Mozilla says Apple’s new browser rules are “as painful as possible” for Firefox (www.theverge.com)

submitted 9 months ago by glowie@h4x0r.host to c/technology@lemmy.world

175 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 329 points 9 months ago

smells like legally actionable monopolistic behavior. apple clearly needs to be broken up... when was the last time we did that?

[-] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 58 points 9 months ago

That was literally the point of this ruling. The EU only has the power to enforce things in the EU and they can't force Apple to act differently outside of it.

[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

Bit the EU could still go nuclear and just refuse to let apple trade I the EU. It's not an EU company and it doesn't make products in the EU.

Financially it doesn't care about apple being able to sell there

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (61 replies)

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 273 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

When a company' website doesn't work on Firefox I don't get angry at Firefox, I just don't use the site. When a company makes their cookie popups are a pain in the ass I don't get angry at the EU, I get angry at the company that made the popup. I use Firefox as a Canary that dies when a website is a piece of shit.

Maybe it's a win-win, I don't have to deal with Apple's bullshit and Apple doesn't have to waste resources on me, for me to block all their shady shit.

[-] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 29 points 9 months ago

I feel the same but I also cannot avoid some sites. Ohio's unemployment and job board only works with Chrome based sites and I have to use those when I'm in between jobs.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 26 points 9 months ago

This brings up an interesting thought though. Should governments and states be able to prefer you to use a certain browser or should they be required to make the website function on all..

[-] Mocheeze@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Pretty sure the old fuckers in the legislature aren't writing that into the contracts. If you ask them what browser they're using they'll probably say "internet."

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 11 points 9 months ago

If the government cared at all about accessibility, then you'd be able to do your taxes in an HTML form.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (8 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 19 points 9 months ago

There's an extension called Consent-O-Matic that will deal with the popups automatically for you.

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

Presumably rejecting them? It's the legitimate toggle that gets me though. How do 400 partners require access to my browsing information in order for your site to run?

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (37 replies)

[-] jackhp95@lemmy.world 249 points 9 months ago

I absolutely love how Mozilla has been calling out Apple, Google, and Microsoft. So good.

[-] baatliwala@lemmy.world 63 points 9 months ago

Sad thing is they don't have enough pull to make people listen.

[-] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 9 months ago

Well they recently got people to get scared of what car manufacturers want to do with all sensitive data they get access to, who knows

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (14 replies)

[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 108 points 9 months ago

Of course, they want to make it as complicated as possible so that people don't actually do it.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 86 points 9 months ago

This is why I support Linux and open source stuff whenever I can. Always used Firefox. Linux on the server and desktop. Doesn't work for everyone but it's the last free open thing we've got. What's been great about Linux is now that basically everything is a Web app Linux is the perfect OS. But now we are dealing with bullshit browser wars. Uhg. Firefox will be the Linux if browsers in no time.

load more comments (2 replies)

[+] Dominik@lemmy.world 57 points 9 months ago

[deleted]

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I feel like of a group of dedicated Firefox engineers should fork the source code and start their own company.

If they would focus on adding really useful features at a rapid pace, people would be willing to pay for it.

Similiar to Kagi, if you make a really good software, you will get a group of dedicated people to support you.

Just a tech company without these super expensive CEOs that are not needed in a smaller company.

[-] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

Servo is a fork of a Mozilla research project, it's moved to the Linux foundation.

They are rebuilding a web engine built for the internet today, rather than adapting the older web engines of yesterday. Mozilla already uses some of their components in Firefox.

But they are only building a web engine, for other people to turn into browsers, we views, electron alternatives etc.

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

Aren't there already a bunch of forks of Firefox already? How will one more help anything?

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

There is a difference between forks made by other people to tweak a project/do something specific for it, and the base project's dev team moving away from whatever it became.

I'm usually not in favor of such fork because the reason for moving away is sometime dubious; some project just rename themselves to "start fresh and drop legacy compatibility issue". But in the case of Firefox, Mozilla is the thing holding back features while adding bloat. Since it can't change to a saner structure with more long-term sustainability plans, devs/engineers could move into a fork to not be bound to that anymore.

Of course it's not that easy; for all the bad Mozilla (foundation or other, I don't care much that they are two entities at this point since one is owned by the other) is doing to the actual software, they do provide salaries. At least, for now.

[-] fromaj_debite@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Lol. Firefox cost of development is $500 milions a year. Stop bs. No one can develop a browser anymore, even Microsoft. And the salary of CEO is not the problem.

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 11 points 9 months ago

I don't think your idea is bad but remember that the reason that small companies (like the one that makes arc) can maintain a browser is that they're using chromium, and maintaining a browser engine is the hard part

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] autotldr 25 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Apple’s new rules in the European Union mean browsers like Firefox can finally use their own engines on iOS.

Although this may seem like a welcome change, Mozilla spokesperson Damiano DeMonte tells The Verge it’s “extremely disappointed” with the way things turned out.

“We are still reviewing the technical details but are extremely disappointed with Apple’s proposed plan to restrict the newly-announced BrowserEngineKit to EU-specific apps,” DeMonte says.

In iOS 17.4, Apple will no longer force browsers in the EU to use WebKit, the underlying engine that powers Safari.

“Apple’s proposals fail to give consumers viable choices by making it as painful as possible for others to provide competitive alternatives to Safari,” DeMonte adds.

Epic CEO Tim Sweeney called the new terms a “horror show,” while Spotify said the changes are a “farce.” Apple’s guidelines are still pending approval by the EU Commission.

The original article contains 285 words, the summary contains 142 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] yoz@aussie.zone 24 points 9 months ago

Bro legit question, why can't all the app developers pull their app from apple store. Within no time apple will change its tune

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social 47 points 9 months ago

Because app developers have to jump through a lot of hoops to get into the app store, and even if every single app was pulled then the developers would have to jump through all those hoops again. And this time, Apple won't make it easy. Meanwhile, they are hemorrhaging money for every minute their app is not on the app store. On the other hand, Apple would give incentives to new applicants to replace everything that was pulled, and the app store returns to relatively normal within 24 hours since there are tons of apps out there that just aren't popular enough to be on the app store at the moment. Would you want to be the first developer to pull their app?

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] anlumo@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Would you pay for the missed income then? Who would?

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Apple only has this power because its users are a major source of income for developers.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Haha@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Lmao i was calling apple out earlier in a thread for this exact reason!!!

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

Crapple at it again

load more comments

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024

1314 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59174 readers

2383 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS