[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 3 days ago

Someone identifying with Homelander would. That's the real meme here.

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 days ago

I remember Watchtower helpfully stopping Pihole before pulling the new image when I only had the one instance running... All while I was out at work with the fiancée on her day off. So many teaching moments in so little time.

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 days ago

Home server: Proxmox (Debian). Redundant DNS: Raspbian (Debian). Parent's server: Debian (Debian).

Gonna be honest, I mostly live off my phone and a retroid pocket.

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 4 days ago

Linux does what Windont?

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

How many desert island discs do I get? I'll do three lesser known ones

Make it all show - Skating Polly. I love the vocal styles, not sure I'd reccommend the band (I do have tickets this year though)

Masters of reality - Masters of reality. Not so much a band as a producer pulling talent and doing odd projects. Not a track on this I don't sing along to though... especially the instrumentals.

Rakshak - Bloodywood. Sometimes I need flute solos in my life, sometimes I need someone to aggressively tell me that shit is going to be ok.

3 more known ones.

Dummy - Portishead. Original pirate material - The streets. New levels new devils - Polyphia

16

I set up an *arr stack and made it work, and now I'm trying to make it safe - the objectivly correct order.

I installed uncomplicated firewall on the system to pretend to protect myself, and opened ports as and when I needed them.

So I'm in mind to fix my firewall rules and my question is this: Given there's a more sensible ufw rule set what is it, I have looked online I couldn't find any answers? Either "limit 8080", "limit 9696", "limit ..." etc. or "open". Or " allow 192.168.0.0/16" would I have to allow my docker's subnet as well?

To head off any "why didn't you ?" it's because I'm dumb. Cheers in advance.

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 273 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

When a company' website doesn't work on Firefox I don't get angry at Firefox, I just don't use the site. When a company makes their cookie popups are a pain in the ass I don't get angry at the EU, I get angry at the company that made the popup. I use Firefox as a Canary that dies when a website is a piece of shit.

Maybe it's a win-win, I don't have to deal with Apple's bullshit and Apple doesn't have to waste resources on me, for me to block all their shady shit.

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 8 months ago

Free wouldnt work either. nobody would make any content.

Except it was free, and people did make content.

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 243 points 8 months ago

Really, it's to focus on her Lemmy presence.

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 95 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As you're here on Lemmy, a site that has pornographic content, we're going to need you to post a picture of your government ID, next to your face, with your username on a piece of paper, as a reply to this comment. You know, to prevent kids accessing porn.

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nakamura said in a podcast all he would need to know is that there is a winning move and he'd be able to find it.

So, just one buzz is enough that says "in this position there is a move that wins the game".

Kinda like everyone's ratings in puzzles is higher than in elo because by the very nature of the puzzle there is a winning sequence to find.

In play, if I don't spot a winning tactic I just move to (try to) improve my position. In puzzles if I don't spot a winning tactic, I look again, and again, and again....

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Anyone willing to drop some learning on a lay person? Is encrypted data less compressable because it lacks the patterns compression relies on?

Or, is it less secure to encrypt first because smart people things? I know enough about cryptography to know I know fuck all about cryptography.

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 59 points 1 year ago

Not necessarily: consider a string of '0's and '1's' both infinite and random.

011101010101000....

No matter how long you look, you'll never find a '2'. Same with the multiverse, not all things need to exist.

view more: next ›

Fedegenerate

joined 1 year ago