17
submitted 9 months ago by reddthat@reddthat.com to c/memes@reddthat.com

They are going to need a lot more money before #nintendo destroys them

Honestly surprised it hasn't been taken down considering...

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 9 months ago

Nintendo is the most litigation heavy company in the world if they've not been taken down already then it's obviously because there is no case. The game has been in development for like 2 years now and Nintendo has had plenty of time. It's come out now, which means it's not a problem.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

There is one Pal'mon that genuinely has a model that is almost a copy of a Poke'mon.

The "hair" on Azurobe is a tweaked version of the hair on Primarina.

There are like 3 others that have features that kind of copy Poke'mon, but so weak that you can't really call it a problem.

[-] criitz@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

Pokémon already had animal slavery, they didn't add that part. Just the guns.

[-] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

You can slavery the humans too

[-] Assman@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

You're thinking of sujimon

[-] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm also thinking of the literal humans, and it tells you its ~~immortal~~ immoral to do, but still lets you. You can even sell them. I haven't tried to butcher yet.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Taken down considering what?

Being derivative is not necessarily an actionable offense.

[-] CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

The Nintendo and TPC legal teams have been watching Palworld since it was announced. If there was anything actionable, they would have acted already.

Just look at the Pokemon mod for Palworld that was already taken down, less than 8 hours after being announced.

[-] averyminya@beehaw.org 0 points 9 months ago

Or they're trying to make as much as possible off them from a lawsuit.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

That's not how it works. Copyright infringement requires the company to defend its copyright. Companies are not allowed to just leave it for a bit if they do that then it's interpreted as them having abandoned their copyright.

Anyway there's absolutely nothing actionable because you cannot copyright basic ideas. You cannot copyright the idea of made up animals that you do things with.

[-] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Let's Game it Out already broke this game with an assault rifle: https://youtube.com/watch?v=jQJYHSlz4Ss

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

That was fucking stupid. YouTubers are garbage these days.

[-] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

His million views say otherwise. As a QA engineer we find it hilarious how he finds these bugs.

[-] reddthat@reddthat.com 0 points 9 months ago

Was it an assault rifle? Or was it glitching building stairs in a place where you get infinite XP? Either way that video is what inspired this meme (for me at least)

[-] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I guess you could argue both. Once you have the AR you're basically unstoppable.

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)

Memes @ Reddthat

917 readers
57 users here now

The Memes community. Where Memes matter the most.

We abide by Reddthat's Instance Rules & the Lemmy Code of Conduct. By interacting here you agree to these terms.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS