637

Oregon high court says 10 GOP state senators who staged long walkout can’t run for reelection (www.politico.com)

submitted 9 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 247 points 9 months ago

Minority leader Tim Knopp said:

we are deeply disturbed by the chilling impact this decision will have to crush dissent

Give me a fucking break. As a legislator, you have no shortage of ways to dissent including access to media, the ability to speak on the floor of the legislature, and the ability to vote on legislation. What you can't do, if you want to keep your job is not show up for work every time you know you're going to lose a vote so that the legislature can't do business.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 86 points 9 months ago

"What about a musician who wants to express a nonpartisan message that young people should participate in our democracy?"

That's DIFFERENT she needs to JUST SHUT UP

[-] Fester@lemm.ee 19 points 9 months ago

“She said she votes for human rights, so we know she votes for the wrong team.”

[-] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 76 points 9 months ago

As an Oregon voter, tough shit. We voted with a 68% majority to amend the state constitution, with explicit penalties for legislative absenteeism.

The chilling impact they are feeling is the will of the people bitch slapping their defunct political strategy.

[-] wavebeam@lemmy.world 57 points 9 months ago

"But that's all just Portland voters! All the rest us of didn't want that!" - My idiot father. Yeah dude, Portland is most of us. Your vote isn't worth more just because you live around less people.

[-] Untitled4774@sh.itjust.works 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Land doesn’t vote

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

That's still a majority. Tough shit pops, do some math.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's not even true. There are 3 million registered voters in Oregon, of whom 565k are in Portland (well, Multnomah). While we lean very heavily D, most of the registered D's in the state are elsewhere.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

"Portland" is usually used as shorthand for Clackamas/Multnomah/Washington counties, which are about half the states population overall. Shouldn't be shocking that half the states population does rather heavily influence how the state is run though. Did folks expect Harney county (10,135 sq mi, with 7,515 people) to be the big decider? C'mon now.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Surprisingly, even if you include all 3 counties you're still only about 40% of the registered voters--although you are now at about 50% of the registered D's. Meaning the rest of the state skews Republican but not by that much.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 62 points 9 months ago

Refuse to do job.

Get fired.

/surprisedpikachu

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago

Not even fired, but not rehired when their contract is up.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

we are deeply disturbed by the chilling impact this decision will have to crush dissent

What they really said is: Wah! Boohoo! We don't like consequences for our actions! Wah! Wah!

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

Daddy, why are they fucking around and when they find out, they're being little bitches?

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 9 months ago

Because they are little bitches.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

The amendment says a lawmaker is not allowed to run “for the term following the election after the member’s current term is completed.” The senators claimed the amendment meant they could seek another term, since a senator’s term ends in January while elections are held the previous November.

What a slimey disingenuous BS argument. They are knowingly trying to subvert the law specifically aimed at their behavior while pretending it's SOMEHOW the will of the voters to ignore them.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 208 points 9 months ago

Conservatives supported this rule to punish those who attempted to manipulate sessions by not showing up. When the rule applies to them, they pretend they are victims of some kind.

The entire time the walk-out was happening, they told the media the rule wouldn't apply to them and they intended to run again. It was pure arrogance as it happened. And it's pure arrogance now as they claim their rule shouldn't apply to them.

Fuck conservatives. A conservative is incapable of honesty. Every word they utter is deception or manipulation. Every word.

[-] TheaoneAndOnly27@kbin.social 78 points 9 months ago

As an orgonian, fuck yes, that entire group can go eat a bag of dicks.

[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

…eat a bag of dicks…

Why would you reward them?

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

* expired dicks

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

yeah, give me those dicks

[-] aphlamingphoenix@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

We should hang out sometime.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

i'll tell you what should hang out...

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 59 points 9 months ago

The GOP loves whining and not doing their job. These people are being paid to represent people, by wilfully abusing quorum to stall the process they are doing their constituents a major disservice.

Filibuster if you want to stand there and defend against change you disagree with, but using absence as a political weapon is slimy and low effort.

[-] Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 9 months ago

Isn't that literally what the nazis did? Block decision making by walking out of the Reichstag when they were in the oposition?

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Yeah they also used the term "fake news" to illegitimize opposing news sources just like a specific rotten orange I refuse to name

[-] Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago

Huh. Who'd thought?

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago

As an Oregonian...

Hehe. Hehehehe! Hehehahahaaahahah!!! ...*gasp*... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

Huuurrr hurr hurrr.

Found out.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 28 points 9 months ago

What a pack of morons.

[-] jwing@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Proud of my state here

[-] frezik@midwest.social 17 points 9 months ago

Where will the GOP find 10 more shit heads to run?

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Womp womp.

[-] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

What? There's a consequence for not doing your job? Who would have guessed?

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

HAHAHAHAHA

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 9 months ago

FAFO indeed.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024

637 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19072 readers

3833 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News