641
submitted 9 months ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

President Biden vowed on Monday to veto a House Republican bill that would provide $17.6 billion in aid to Israel, calling it a “cynical political maneuver” intended to hurt the chances of passage for broader legislation that would provide money for Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan and the U.S. border.

House Republicans fiercely oppose the larger bill, which was unveiled by a small, bipartisan group of senators over the weekend. It calls for $118.3 billion in spending and would overhaul some of the nation’s immigration laws to deal with recent surges of migrants at the southern border.

Archive

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 185 points 9 months ago

The president hears the people no longer agree with our stance on Israel

The president changes his policies to reflect the will of the people

This is how it's supposed to work!

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 90 points 9 months ago

It's unfortunate that I have run into people that don't believe that. I once got called a flipflopper because I commented one stance based on inaccurate information I had, and was given new accurate information which changed my mind.

People be treating reality like a high school debate club and just sticking with a position because that's what they choose at the beginning. You can change your mind. Especially if it's based on new information you didn't have before.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Right? I knew that Gaza was bad before this conflict but I didn't have any real information. I then went and educated myself and I have a pretty firm opinion on the subject now which is different than it used to be.

[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Highschool debate club has failed if that's what people compare actual debate to. It's necessary to take a firm stand in a discussion, even being devil's advocate is fine, as long as it happens objectively.

But I guess HS debates just end after three rounds and then no retrospective happens about what stance (not WHO) was right and why.

TL;DR HS debates were supposed to be better than this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 25 points 9 months ago

Thats not what is happening though is it?

The republicans want to kill funding for Ukraine, humantiarian aid and better protection of jewish and muslim places of worship against US domestic terrorism.

So they propose a "fund Israel only" bill, that Biden has to veto on and they can cry out against. He still wants the IDF to receive that money though, so they can continue destroying what is left of Gaza and kill and drive out even more people.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thantik@lemmy.world 141 points 9 months ago

This is so stupid. NYTimes putting the phrase "to deal with recent surges of migrants at the southern border"...there IS no surge of migrants. They're pushing bullshit in a passive way to make it sound legitimate.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 106 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, migrants just love to surge come election time.

What a bullshit.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Remember the massive "caravan" of migrants Fox breathlessly talked about as it made its way to the border?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Let's see what the source says:

https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/southwest-land-border-encounters

There were 50k more border encounters (illegal apprehensions) in December than the year before. In fact, encounters have been significantly higher than recent years since August (no data for January).

You can agree or disagree with the response to the influx of people at the border. But there is no denying there has been a considerable increase in traffic.

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago

Except we've heard this (the surge point) every year for the past several election seasons and at other times. Someone didn't learn the lesson of the boy who cried wolf. Tough to get people to listen when it's actually happening if you bullshit them at other times.

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

I don't disagree one bit. The Border(TM) gets trotted out more than it ought to every couple years. That's probably why this issue will never be fixed--it's great at riling people up.

However, I think people should still be aware of the facts of the situation. At least if they actually care about the problem. Misinformation doesn't fix anything.

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

I agree. And I appreciate you sharing that information.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If you think this is BS, then bring numbers and facts. This surge, at the moment, is real. Check OP's link.

It's real. It's happening. FFS, put politics aside, this is a humanitarian issue. And how are we to absorb so many extra immigrants this year?

Conservatives are bitching about jobs. Liberals are bitching about housing costs. Both concerns are wildly complex, but we have an issue right now, today.

Check my earlier comments and numbers. How do you propose to deal with an extra CHICAGO+ worth of humans? How fast can we build infrastructure and housing? I will point out, we're only talking about illegal Southern border crossings, leaving out the rest of the immigration story. FFS, my wife is an immigrant. We're trying to get her son over here.

I don't have ideas, no ideas we can deploy fast enough, I ain't that smart. But just because conservatives are pitching a fit doesn't mean our current border crossings are not an issue.

We're talking about live human beings here. Waving them off as a GOP conspiracy is ignorant at best, hurting people. Want to go to the border and tell those people they're not real? Tell them they're GOP pawns? Or, someone will come along and tell me they don't believe government numbers they don't agree with. Like the nuts did with COVID and the CDC?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Could absolutely be more enforcement, and not more traffic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 69 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This is like the worst version of the trolley problem being worked out in real time.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

Republicans be like:

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 57 points 9 months ago

I hate that the two are becoming more and more conflated. Ukraine is fighting off a invasion; Israel is invading and has driven the people of palestine into radical organization and direct action. These funds should go to aid and peace efforts instead.

[-] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Also Gaza is NOT a war while Ukraine is, Gaza is a genocide.

In Ukraine organized military forces clash over territory with both sides fielding artillery, tanks, aircraft and other sophisticated military systems. Russia is seeking to control Ukraine and annex most of it, but it literally has to roll tanks all the way through contested territory to do this.

Israel already controls and surrounds all of Gaza, it controls all administrative and infrastructural aspects of Gaza so much so that Israel was able to build a wall straight through the heart of Gaza just to fuck with Palestinians. There is no ground war in Gaza with infantry divisions fighting over territory, there is just Israel repeatedly dropping an absolutely absurd amount of bombs (dropping in several weeks on the tiny footprint of Gaza what the bomb happy US only managed to drop in a year in the Iraq War) on a civilian population that has no means to leave even if they wanted to.

You don’t need to fight a war when you can just shut the water, lights and internet off to an entire city, you can shutter the hospitals with a lift of a finger. If there was a war, it was over long ago and what people call a “war” now is mere symbolic violent resistance meant to attract the attention of someone powerful enough to help (or stop). The thing that should make every one of us want to scream is the only problems the Israeli government sees with cut off water and let ‘em starve solution is that 1. it doesn’t kill Palestinians fast enough to sweep under the rug out of international scrutiny and 2. it doesn’t magically bulldoze the houses of the Palestinians killed and erased like a bomb does all in one go.

Hamas is not a terrorist organization because it chose to be one instead of a traditional army, it is a terrorist organization because a war with large armies is simply impossible for Hamas to even begin to fight against the combined military industrial complex of the U.S. and Israel. I say “begin” specifically because in order to fight a war with a military you have to first bring together all your soldiers and the minute Hamas did that Israel would carpet bomb the map square of that gathering place out of existence. War over before it even started.

I am not defending Hamas (I am so tired of saying this, of course they are awful) but simply pointing out Israel’s main justification for their genocide is that Hamas chooses to be a terrorist organization because they are evil and not because it is an organization of people who feel armed resistance is necessary (a sentiment Israeli’s should understand) and terrorism is literally the only armed resistance option on the table. It’s not like Hamas makes tunnels because they love digging and just don’t feel like fielding columns upon columns of 120mm main battle tanks they have in storage…

What is happening in Gaza is collective punishment for the actions of a few, it is genocide, it is horrific slaughter and land theft, it is a disgusting rightwing fantasy of violence but It is NOT a war that makes the IDF look way too honorable here. Gaza is what happens after a war ends and one side has complete power over the other. It is closer to soldiers raping and pillaging a civilian population en masse in the wake of an invasion than a war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CylonBunny@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Also Gaza is the size of basically just one neighborhood inside of Kiev alone. The scale of two the conflicts are so massively different. Many Americans I’ve discussed this with have no idea how much bigger Ukraine is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Melkath@kbin.social 45 points 9 months ago

Ah, so he wants to make sure that everyone gets funding, not just Israel.

How about NO MONEY TO THE MOTHER FUCKING GENOCIDE?

[-] ra1d3n@lemm.ee 25 points 9 months ago

He is not a dictator, you know? The other side argues for only genocide.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

Yeah, what we need is the opposite bill: the one that helps Ukraine but not Israel.

[-] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 42 points 9 months ago

Outrage should be reserved until it’s known what’s on the bill. It was drawn up by conservatives- I’d wager its purpose is to disenfranchise far left voters.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 37 points 9 months ago

Anything drawn up by conservatives will be worthy of outrage. They're not going to magically stop being monsters.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

It'll also be pork barreled up the ying yang.

And America wonders why it's debt is so high. :(

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 37 points 9 months ago

Isn't Israel the 'bigger fish' in their conflict? I don't question that our status is "allies", but it's so strange thinking they need "help"?

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 16 points 9 months ago

It's even more gross if you read the article. Mike Johnson is saying Israel is "fighting for its very existence." Fucking lying conservative trash.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 11 points 9 months ago

Israel would have no chance of continueing its escalation with all the neighbouring countries if it wasnt for US military aid. They dont have the capacities to produce that many bombs, missiles, tank and artillery shells.

The US needs Israel to be at perpetual escalation and war to destabilize the Midlle East and prevent the emergence of an unified arab bloc that would be the size of the EU, but control many of the cheap oil ressources and vital trade routes.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago
[-] blazera@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

Wish there was a rule barring packaging unrelated legislation

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Drusas@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

Sounds like a win all around if he does. Israel does not need the help.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 12 points 9 months ago

He still wants to find Israel, just as a part of a larger bill.

Both parties want Israel to continue. Just that the republicans want Putin to win the war in Ukraine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Xariphon@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

How about we switch that around...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
641 points (98.8% liked)

News

23274 readers
3047 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS