167
submitted 1 year ago by reddfugee@feddit.de to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] StimpyMGS@feddit.nl 176 points 1 year ago
[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 134 points 1 year ago

conservatives made a whole smear campaign against her to try and silence her and demoralize her, and she's only stood up even more for it. Can't say she's done nothing if they're trying so hard to discredit her

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 138 points 1 year ago

She's gotten the issue of climate change to be a major issue with young voters

It's really not her fault that the people in power have a vested interest in ignoring climate change.

Also she got Andrew Tate arrested so there's that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Schneemensch@programming.dev 119 points 1 year ago

Speaking from a German perspective I feel like the Fridays for future movement has significantly affected (parts of) her generation. I have many colleagues whose kids are focusing on a diet with less environmental impact and also asking their parents to change.

It is impressive that it has been such a long running and wide spreading movement and I am sure that there will be many politicians, activists and entrepreneurs coming out of this movement in the future.

It is hard to expect anything more from a child who has been belittled constantly. I wish I would be standing up for my believes as strongly as she does.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Thunberg’s style is her best asset. She keeps making a simple point, without trying to complexify it. When people try to complexify it, she brings them back to the simple point:

  • this is a major problem
  • it will lead to death and destruction if not addressed
  • we have a tendency to ignore it that needs to be counteracted

She uses the simplest possible language and stays on point. Which for some odd reason nobody else seems to be capable of.

Some will say she’s just a “cheerleader” but that’s kind of what we need if we’re going to address this. Political will is the constraining factor in our climate change response.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 115 points 1 year ago

She's caused every conservative to despise a teenager so much that they send her death threats. Seeing tiny brains be threatened by a young girl is pretty impressive IMO.

[-] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Clean water? Cheap power from solar? No thanks, environmental activists." - tiny 🧠

[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

"What if climate change is a lie and we accidentally make the world a better place for nothing?"

[-] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

We'll just have to suffer through the clean air and stable climate until we can build up enough smog and CO2 to get things back to how they are currently, hopefully worse.

[-] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What she (and other climate activists) have done and do is spread awareness about this issue. As you can imagine, it's important to keep important topics (arguably even the most important topic humanity faces, yes even more important than soccer (lol)) present in media and in people's heads for them to not be forgotten soon after again. People need to be constantly reminded that our current way of life currently destroys our planet, especially considering that not much happened to steer against this problem within the last couple of years after the Paris agreement. And we don't even know many of the tipping points that could accelerate disaster even further. When some ecosystems stop existing and food chains become disrupted, for example.

In a way, she's like a PR person for the most important topic in science currently. And she (and other climate actrivists) is successful at it, considering it's so often in the news and so many of the polluters hate her and try to discredit her and others.

Always remember though: it's about the problem, not specific people. Of course we like talking about people, and the media does it as well, but as the saying goes, "small minds discuss people, great minds discuss ideas". It's about the problem at hand, irrelevant of Greta or other activists. She's just trying to bring the point across to a mass audience, that's all. We (as in: the whole humanity, no exceptions) need to take action against the problem, not talk about Greta. This "ad hominem" strategy is sometimes deliberately used as a distraction away from the issue at hand. When articles talk about Greta or try to discredit her or whatever, then the debate is shifted away from the actual problem at hand. Even articles about her in a positive light are, in the end, irrelevant. It's not about her, or other climate activists. She even says that herself. If the activists didn't exist, we'd still face the exact same problem.

[-] steakmeout@aussie.zone 34 points 1 year ago

OK now ask what word leaders and companies that hold power have actually achieved so far in the same period.

[-] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 year ago

It's been five whole years and this teenager hasn't defeated all of global capitalism, what's she even doing?

[-] ATQ@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

Five years later this is a relevant question. So her awareness campaign is at least as effective as Susan G. Komen.

[-] Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

You need to think more long term, next generation level. Because of her and others, kids will be born and raised with the mindset that the planet needs saving.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

Main things is that Gen Z is ashamed of travelling by plane

[-] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

They do it anyway though.

A full plane is still greener than a car with 1-2 passengers.

[-] heimchen@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

I was thinking about doing the math awhile ago, because a full A320 Neon only uses 1,5l per passenger for 100 km. They just don't burn the same fuel and at different altitudes.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

A full plane is still greener than a car with 1-2 passengers.

That may be true if you're going the same distance, but planes go a lot farther. A lot of plane trips are unnecessary, and wouldn't be made at all if the plane wasn't an option. Many car trips are also unnecessary, but given modern infrastructure, they tend to be more necessary than plane trips.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago

What have you achieved in try e past 5 years?

[-] Smoltech@lemmyunchained.net 10 points 1 year ago

She opened my eyes to something that should have been obvious.

Eternal economic growth is a fairy tale that's killing us.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 8 points 1 year ago

What did you achieve since 2018?

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

There's been a bunch of decent memes.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
167 points (86.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43893 readers
866 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS