661
submitted 9 months ago by rikudou to c/technology@lemmy.world

Apple being Apple again. Just why does anyone actually like that company?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 164 points 9 months ago

Man, they're seething against the EU, totally pissed that the legislators worked against their abuse over developers and rubbed against their cash cow.

Apple is all about money and fucking the user, being no different from Meta or Google. All they have is shinier hardware.

[-] rikudou 71 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Much worse than Google IMO, at least when it comes to fucking with rules made by EU. Google usually tries to appeal legally and if it doesn't work out, they do what they must. This Apple bulshittery with 3rd party app stores is a new one. Someone here in this thread said that the worst EU can do to companies breaking DMA is forcing them to sell the division. I would love for Apple to push EU that far.

[-] menemen@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Companies working against technical standards are basically working against society. And no one fights standards quite like Apple.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

I'd argue they have better hardware. I'd love to have an iPhone running stock Android.

[-] olutukko@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

I mean the og comment literally said "all they have is shinier hardware"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] viking@infosec.pub 91 points 9 months ago
load more comments (18 replies)
[-] ahnesampo@sopuli.xyz 86 points 9 months ago

Third party browser & JavaScript engine + ability to install web apps on the Home screen = third party app store that doesn’t have to pay Apple’s fees.

When Apple could force everyone to use Apple’s WebKit, web apps didn’t matter as much as Apple could limit WebKit features to push people to the App Store. E.g. it took ages to get push notifications on WebKit. If Google and Mozilla are free to make whatever improvements to their browser engines, the need to have native apps on the phone decreases considerably.

[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 22 points 9 months ago

That's what I really want personally, the mobile web Steve Jobs envisioned. Glorious web apps without flash.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tonytins@pawb.social 64 points 9 months ago

Just why does anyone actually like that company?

I mean, if Google weren't shit, I'm sure Android would be more viable. They've can't even keep a consistent brand! They've gone from Google Play this and that, to migrating everything - including podcasts - to YouTube.

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 88 points 9 months ago

migrating everything - including podcasts - to YouTube

If only there were other apps for podcasts on Android, it would be a viable operating system.

Google is kind of crap, but Android has a lot more built-in escape hatches than iOS does. People don't seem to use them as much as I'd hoped, but they're available.

[-] PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk 41 points 9 months ago

I've been using Podcast Addict for years now. Dunno why people think they are bound to one thing when Android offers so many choices.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] rikudou 54 points 9 months ago

Android is more popular globally, the only place where it isn't true (AFAIK) is USA where the colour of the text bubble is important for reasons that defy logic.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Fuck google buy a google pixel then put grapheneos on it

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

Fuck Google

Give them money

Is there another option?

[-] TotalSonic@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Other options are Fairphone, Volla, Murena - or flashing "vanilla" custom ROM's on phones other than Pixels - or using Ubuntu Touch, Plasma Mobile, Mobian, Droidian or Sailfish OS.

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Its kinda ironic that google pixel is the only phone with decent secirity hardware and an unlockablw bootloader.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lovesickoyster@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago

I moved from android to iphone 2 years ago. As soon as this piece of crap dies, I'm moving back to android.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 41 points 9 months ago

Aah, the security again...

Fuck this company

[-] Eggyhead@kbin.social 41 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Welp, this might be kbin for me. It’s the only circumstance I’ve really found a PWA necessary, although I’ve considered making PWAs of some online shops I frequent.

I suspect Apple is eliminating PWAs from safari in the EU just because they don’t want to be forced to allow 3rd party browsers to do the same. Let’s go ahead and throw the baby out with the bathwater.

I’ve actually got a U.S. apple account on an iPhone bought in Japan, and living in the EU temporarily. It’ll be interesting to see how this is going to play out for me.

[-] danielfgom@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

Apple really sucks hard! What a terrible company! 🤮🤮

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Fuzzypyro@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago

As a sysadmin and self-hoster this decision will absolutely make me drop Apple 150%. A clean and well implemented pwa was a big reason I have stuck with my iPhone 12 despite buying a pixel 7. I know there are options on Android but they all have issues either in ux or in ui that makes it very obvious I’m using a pwa.

[-] Kribensis@lemm.ee 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This is a Reddit-style circle jerk. A LOT of people like Apple, because even though they’re almost as remorseless as Amazon or Microsoft or Google when it comes to maximizing profits, they build good products, create new product categories, and they’ve been doing both of those things for 40 years.

Is this a sleazy thing to do? Yup. Is it as sleazy as Meta intentionally allowing its algorithm to push softcore kiddie porn to teen Instagram users? Nope. Not even in the same ballpark.

[-] heavy@sh.itjust.works 112 points 9 months ago

Ah, sounds like what-about-ism. Metas behavior doesn't exempt Apple from criticism. That logic tends to drive all of our standards and expectations down.

Theres room to criticize and expect more from all of these companies who are more than capable of doing better.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 24 points 9 months ago

create new product categories

I'm wondering what they are. The Newton was kind of cool, but before it's time. mp3 players had been out for years before Apple jumped on the bandwagon. Same with phones. I hope this doesn't come across as snarky "fuck apple", I'm genuinely curious.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago

create new product categories

[chasing goose meme]

Like what?

LIKE WHAT MOTHERFUCKER!?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

Some services, like Facebook Gaming, use web apps as a way to get around the Apple App Store and its fees.

Smell coming out from this little hole here :)

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] sagrotan@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

Whoever buys apple shit will learn eventually. Or just go extinct.

[-] eagles_fan@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 9 months ago

Another reason to keep hating apple. Fascists corporate america

[-] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 9 months ago

Queue the Apple dick riders defending their precious megacorp from being a POS company

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 9 months ago

Holy shit if this is true it will be a game changer for me . Will be start looking android devices. Such a retrograde movement!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

The probably couldn't afford the development /s

But on the positive side, Apple is now forced to allow other app stores on all phones in the EU.

So that's probably a bigger win than this is a loss.

[-] rikudou 21 points 9 months ago

Depends on whether your app is distributed as a PWA or not. Mine is, so it kinda touches me personally.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 16 points 9 months ago

Apple being Apple again. Just why does anyone actually like that company?

Marketing and build quality goes a long way to making people feel like a company is good.

[-] rikudou 14 points 9 months ago

What's this fabled build quality that other phones in the same price range don't have?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yildolw@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

This is probably motivated by the EU decision that since no uses iMessage in the EU, Apple is not legally a "gatekeeper". Perhaps no one (i.e. fewer than 40 million people) uses web apps in the EU, therefore they are gambling that they are allowed to legally gatekeep in that market

[-] rikudou 28 points 9 months ago

I don't think so, they're just trying to make the experience worse and then say "it's the EU that made us do it".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] autotldr 13 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Apple is officially axing support for progressive web apps for iPhone users located in the European Union.

While web apps have been broken for EU users in every iOS 17.4 beta so far, Apple has now confirmed that this is a feature, not a bug.

In an update to its developer website spotted by 9to5Mac, Apple says it’s removing homescreen apps for users in the EU because bringing them into compliance with the Digital Markets Act (DMA) would involve “an entirely new integration architecture” that’s “not practical” to build on top of the other changes it’s been forced to make.

In its post, Apple argues that web apps are built “directly on WebKit” — the engine used by Safari — allowing web apps to “align with the security and privacy model for native apps on iOS.” With the change to iOS 17.4, websites added to the homescreen now act only as bookmarks that open a new tab in your browser, rather than (potentially) standalone services capable of doing things like sending notifications and showing badges, a feature Apple just added to web apps last year.

Progressive web apps on iOS are also capable of storing data separately from your browser instance, which comes in handy if there’s a site you want quick access to and don’t want to keep signing in.

“Still, we regret any impact this change — that was made as part of the work to comply with the DMA — may have on developers of Home Screen web apps and our users.” Apple cites “very low user adoption” of homescreen apps as another reason for the lack of support.


The original article contains 399 words, the summary contains 272 words. Saved 32%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] RiQuY@lemm.ee 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

TL;DR: Fuck Apple.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
661 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
2567 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS