415
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] andallthat@lemmy.world 151 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Moon, unprovoked, collided with the Russian vessel that was approaching amicably. An old, whitened but still recognizable USA flag was planted on the Moon's surface, indicating this as a clear act of aggression from the imperialist power

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

The Moon said it might join NATO so they had to hit it. They really had no choice.

[-] RheingoldRiver@kbin.social 88 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ceased to exist as a result of a collision with the surface of the Moon

lol

[-] huginn@feddit.it 39 points 1 year ago

Rapid unscheduled disassembly as the result of a lithobraking maneuver

[-] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's part of slow and scheduled disassembly of Roskosmos as organization. 10 years ago it already seemed to be on that trajectory.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

"Roscosmos was mistaken, the landing was actually successful and there was just a temporary communication error." - Kremlin

[-] ApeNo1@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago

The “Kaputnik” has landed.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 12 points 1 year ago

Paid for in rubble.

[-] 0Empty0@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Glad it was unmanned. There's enough senseless death in the world.

If you take a look at the lunar missions for space race, you'll see many of them happened within a year of each other. It's a wonder there weren't more failures!

Compare that to today, where it took almost 20 years of planning for the Hubble telescope to come into fruition.

You shouldn't rush things in space. This is just the latest reminder.

[-] littlecolt@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Technically, the death would have been off-world.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Don't you think that the fact that the mission was unmanned meant that they knew that they're not ready for manned ones yet? So nobody was rushing, as you put it.

[-] Rainhall@feddit.online 17 points 1 year ago

Crewed vs uncrewed is a decision made at the very beginning of the planning stages, years ago. These days a crew is just a gigantic extra expense on a mission with little return. Remotely operated missions can achieve all their scientific objectives.

[-] deadcream@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Manned lunar lander is a mich complex piece of technology which needs to be developed from scratch. It also needs a much more powerful rocket which Russia don't have either. It's at least a decade of extra R&D time even if they get all the funding they need and magically get rid of corruption (which obviously won't happen).

It's unmanned not because they chose it but because they are literally incapable of making a manned mission (at the very least for a couple of generations).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 0Empty0@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

What? It clearly states in the article they knew it was risky... I would consider that rushing.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sure, but it's not rushing as in "let's skip steps of the plan for the sake of time," like it happened with, say, oceangate. It was a calculated risk.

[-] 0Empty0@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/20/world/luna-25-spacecraft-moon-collision-intl/index.html

We've just had more information come out, and it appears you're right about the rushing! I'll eat crow on that

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Deftdrummer@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

"Russia is a world power" 🫡

[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

Well, nobody claimed they'd be a moon power, too.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

Guess all those Ukrainian toilets didn't make good components for a lunar lander?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Smartboystupid@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Good, because they would most probably use it to plant their stupid Z swastika on the moon, because nobody could stop them there.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] frezik@midwest.social 21 points 1 year ago

A couple years back, Putin promised to put a Russian on the moon. A good question is "with what rocket?"

Turns out, an even better question is "with what communications system?" A factor in this crash is that they lack a round-the-world comm system. They can only communicate when the moon is visible over Russia. It's a big country, of course, but not big enough for 24/7 communication.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

"All Russia-hating Nazis were eliminated at the crash site."

The moon's children have been taken for safe keeping.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 16 points 1 year ago

I've played my share of Kerbel Space Program.

The lander made a planned flight to the moon, which included a high acceleration parking maneuver which resulted in unquestionable sucesss! To the Mun!

[-] FFbob@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Lithobreaking maneuver.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Well, I mean... You just point at it and fire all the rockets. Even the Russians can do it!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago

Oh well,... Anyway

[-] autotldr 12 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Russia's Luna-25 spacecraft has crashed into the Moon after spinning out of control, officials say.

The unmanned craft was due to make a soft landing on the Moon's south pole, but failed after encountering problems as it moved into its pre-landing orbit.

The spacecraft was scheduled to land on Monday to explore a part of the Moon which scientists think could hold frozen water and precious elements.

Roscosmos, Russia's state space corporation, said on Sunday morning that it had lost contact with the Luna-25 shortly after 14:57pm (11:57 GMT) on Saturday.

"The apparatus moved into an unpredictable orbit and ceased to exist as a result of a collision with the surface of the Moon," it said in a statement.

Russia has been racing to the Moon's south pole against India, whose Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft is scheduled to land on there next week.


The original article contains 174 words, the summary contains 141 words. Saved 19%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

On brand for Putin

[-] blendedracer@aussie.zone 9 points 1 year ago

Oh No! . . . . . . . . Anyway!

[-] lorez@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago
[-] SevFTW@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

lmao imagine Dacia landing a manned Sandero on the moon before RuZZia

[-] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I've got a new picture!

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is what happens when one vodka's and drives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] detox@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

They were looking for the Iron-Sky but got intercepted

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
415 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
2238 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS