315
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 87 points 8 months ago

an amount that will grow by over $111,000 a day until it's paid.

its like the cherry on top

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That's about $1.25 per second.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago
[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 17 points 8 months ago

My cynicism took over my math center and I thought he was getting away with something. Edited.

A buck and a quarter a second is seriously huge money. Dude's fucked and I'm loving it.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

First one then t'other.

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago
[-] protist@mander.xyz 30 points 8 months ago

Letitia James just said the other day she'll seize his real estate if she has to

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 11 points 8 months ago

im curious to know what happens when he doesnt pay. can they go after all assets, including those not in new york?

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

To my knowledge, New York can seize assets in NY and lien everything else.

I could be wrong tho.

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

In a normal civil case once judgment has entered you receive an execution, which allows you to seize property in the state.

In order to seize property in another state you would have to domesticate the judgment in the new state, then get an execution from that state to seize property. Domestication of a judgment is typically straightforward and simple, but it depends upon the state, some are more arduous than others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Oisteink@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Ianal - but I believe you can’t get a re-trial if you don’t submit the money or a bond. So somebody is going to pay it, even if they have to use rubles or diamonds

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 8 months ago

its the appeal process that cannot begin until theres some bond posted thats a decent percentage, if not all of it. plus interest.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It is 125% of the total judgement.

[-] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

It depends on the jurisdiction. In some there is some judicial discretion. I saw a case where the amount was 111.1%. I am not admitted in New York and am too lazy to look up their rules. Usually the amount is enough to pay the whole judgment plus all costs (which shouldn't be a very high percentage of such a huge judgment, lol).

One of my clients deposited the judgment amount plus court ordered costs in cash in an escrow account of the Court pending the appeal. The prevailing party received the judgment plus the interest the deposit earned (like an IOLTA).

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Michael Popok from Meidas Touch said it was 125% in NY. That's where I got that figure from. I find him to generally be pretty reliable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

NY doesn't care.

Ms. James has already said that NY will seize his buildings one by one and auction them off until the debt is paid.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Gonna need to sell a helluva lot more gold sneakers! Bigly!

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago

Really, an inability to pay will be far more damaging to his campaign than a criminal conviction or jail time. Let's see how it goes.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

That presumes his pithed supporters gave a crap about anything but overt racism and lies.

Spoiler: They do not

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

It's a fair point. I think the key in political contests is to win over undecided voters. You will never win over the Maga zombies. You probably won't win over "my family votes Republican" voters. But there's a chance with the almost impossible to understand undecided voters.

The people who thought "Trump is a businessman and we need a better economy" or "Trump is a billionaire so isn't subject to corruption" might see him differently now. Both of these takes are laughably naive but undecided voters tend to also be low information, last minute people. They get a vague sense of things and go with that. Seeing Trump humiliated on a money issue might do it.

That's just one scenario.

In some purple districts the vote margins are really narrow. A few thousand voters going D instead of R can do it. It's why third party candidates are so damaging.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah the motivated reasoning in trump supporters is strong.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 8 months ago
[-] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 24 points 8 months ago

If he's convicted or imprisoned, his supporters will just consider him a martyr, the victim of a political witch hunt. If it turns out he just can't pay, it shows him to be the loser he is, and reveals his supposedly amazing business sense as a lie.

[-] Oisteink@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

That’s been out in the open for quite some time, but I do not see his numbers dropping. Why would they not use that as a win - not paying the fake trial money! Witch-hunt !!1!

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They will seize his assets if he doesn't pay. He has 30 days.

[-] Oisteink@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

It will still be “our guy” against the government and wicked judges. I can’t see it hurting him at all in the race. Someone will front the money - it’s a golden opportunity for a lot of high stakes players to “save” him

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

It will be interesting to watch, that's for sure

[-] Oisteink@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Agree. And a bit terrifying

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Would be a great opportunity for Russia to funnel the money to him via some stooge or another. Trump's so on sale

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Sneakers: $1,000,000 a pair.

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This take is missing the point a little. The undecided voter is where this matters and you won't see them moving polls. Some districts that affect the outcome are very close calls we where a few thousand undecided going D instead of R can make a difference.

Edit - sorry, was trying to reply to a comment higher up about losing support.

[-] greentreerainfire@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

He will just turn it around on how the DA is doing the bidding of the Biden regime to try and take him out because everyone knows he like money and people know what it’s like when the government tries to take more money from you than they should and that is what Biden is trying to do. But we’re not going to let him. You fine patriotic are going to make sure it doesn’t happen by giving to the true patriot fund.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Not really, IMO. These clowns seem to sit on debt with no punishment or real enforcement.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

The bond will likely be very costly. While courts have discretion in setting exactly how much is required for a bond, New York courts typically require up to 120% of the judgment, including all pre-judgment interest. That means he could have to post a bond for well over $500 million.

No problem, no problem. The guy’s “a billionaire” right? Okay, he pays the court what it’s owed, and, uh, he’s still got a cool half a billion to, y’know buy chewing gum and fly his little plane around and that. Piece o’ cake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OneStepAhead@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 8 months ago

In the end, this is chump change for Putin, who will certainly front the cash for control of the American government.

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

I’m really hoping if he tries, it’ll set off all kinds of red flags with the court-appointed independent reviewer that’s watching his finances like a hawk. Maybe foolishly optimistic of me, but I really hope it works out that way.

Also side note my dude, are you browsing politics news from your porn lemmy account? I mean, respect, but that’s hilarious.

[-] OneStepAhead@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 8 months ago

We can hope for sure. Trumps penchant for using his campaign funds for things could really obfuscate a lot of ‘donations’. The ‘easy out’ I see here is having one of Trump’s rich buddies (I’m sure he still has plenty of people who want a sweet cabinet position, ala DeVoss) takes dollars from Putin (likely as a sweetheart business deal) as a go-between. Money laundering has become an easy-joke these days.

Can you IMAGINE the orgasmic feeling of Trump actually suffering a consequence. No better account to surf this content under. Also, I forgot to switch accounts.

[-] Suspiciousbrowsing@kbin.melroy.org 15 points 8 months ago

Interestingly, I imagine this man would not even get basic security clearance with this level of debt and high risk of being manipulated (by others offering to pay debt). Yet he's still a candidate for president, interesting....

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Even the military will disqualify you if you have too much debt because you become a target of the enemy.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

So how does this end?

Like.. what happens when he fails to pay? Does he get arrested?

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

No, as we do not have "debtor's prison" in the United States....at least not officially. There are certainly ways the system works around that.

However, in this case the state will file a lien against all of his properties, and then begin the legal process of recouping the funds from the judgement if he defaults.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

We don't have debtors prison for the wealthy, but we do for the poor

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

That's what I meant by the "not officially" and "the system works around that" parts 🙃

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

but we do for the poor

Trump is about to be poor

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

$464 million: the cost of one and a half Russian A-50 early warning planes - of which Ukraine just shot down one today - OR the cost of forgiving 12,500 student loans (out of 43 million Americans with student loans).

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Or a fraction of the cost many American families had to bitterly gulp because of that asshole's lies during the pandemic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] autotldr 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A clerk in New York has officially entered a more than $464 million fraud judgment against former President Donald Trump and top executives at his company — an amount that will grow by over $111,000 a day until it's paid.

If he does not do so, the New York attorney general's office will be able to begin collection proceedings against Trump and his co-defendants in the civil fraud case.

Trump's lawyers had sought to delay the judgment from being entered, presumably to allow them more time to line up financing for the bond, but Engoron rejected that request Thursday.

“You have failed to explain, much less justify, any basis for a stay,” Engoron told Trump attorney Clifford S. Robert in an email before he signed the judgment.

In a ruling last week following a months-long trial, Engoron found Trump and his top executives had intentionally engaged in a massive and long-running scheme to improperly inflate his assets in financial statements so he could take advantage of favorable loan and insurances rates he wasn't actually entitled to.

He found their "refusal to admit error — indeed, to continue it, according to the Independent Monitor — constrains this Court to conclude that they will engage in it going forward unless judicially restrained.”


The original article contains 593 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] profdc9@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
315 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3398 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS