197
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BagOfHammers@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Former President Trump’s decision to skip the first Republican presidential primary debate is fueling Republican angst that his rivals will have little opportunity to catch up to him in the polls.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“We let this monster of our own creation rage out of control for 8 years, and he’s still out of control!”

Edit: Also, the Party that tried to enable him to short circuit the democratic process and attempt a violent coup is suddenly upset… that he’s not following the democratic process. :(

[-] hansl@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago

“We tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas!”

[-] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

He who rides the tiger can never dismount.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

He who lets the tiger mount them…

[-] hillbicks@feddit.de 69 points 1 year ago

I think this is the real issue here, jfc.

A Des Moines Register/NBC News/Mediacom poll of likely Republican caucus voters released Monday found that Trump’s lead over DeSantis has grown by 5 points since his indictment in Georgia last week on 13 criminal charges related to trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election in the state.

His approval went UP after the indictment. This is absolutely insane and only shows how hopeless US politics has become. How do you roll that division back? Can you even roll it back if everybody wanted to? This cat is out of the bag and I don't see it going back in there any time soon.

The only hope I've left is the division of the GOP itself. Let the extremists go somewhere else politically and it'll hopefully lead to a more, what is the word again, fact based approach of politics when the extremists can be ignored because you don't have to appease them.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Why is all U.S. politics hopeless because of what's happening inside the losing party?

The dems are far from perfect, but their side is much less "hopeless" as you put it.

[-] grue@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because the Republicans currently have the support of something like 20% more of the population than the NAZIs did when they seized power.

Remember, unlike folks who believe in democracy, tyrants don't need a majority to win.

This is an extremely dangerous time for liberty in the US, and complacent attitudes like yours are only increasing the danger.

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

The rebulicans have plenty of politicians in power besides the president. As long as the voters favour trump they'll need to appease them to get into the other houses.

In an ideal world it will split there vote allowing massive dem gains. But that hasn't happened yet.

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If there's anything the GOP is good at, it's mobilizing and motivating their voters. When they are all so alike, it's easy to get them to agree on the stupid shit.

The democrats have the issue of diversity, which makes it hard to motivate large groups of people on a single issue. Love the diversity for the strength it brings, but it makes it hard to feel you're getting adequate representation in a two-party, first-past-the-post system no matter who you are.

I wouldn't trade the diversity for the mess the GOP is though.

[-] flipht@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Mainstream "normal" republicans won't actually not vote republican. They know that their only hope of maintaining some power is to continue to work with the batshit crazy regressives.

They got in bed with these people via the Southern Strategy, and they've only recently started making noises like they're uncomfortable. Once they're in the booth, though, they will still vote straight ticket.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I expect the Mitt Romney/Chris Christie wing to do a hostile take over of the Libertarian Party and abandon the GOP lable to the Trump wing.

It would be easier to take over a party that's already on all state ballots then create a new one from the ground up.

[-] whatisallthis@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Honestly it’s just as easy as the media deciding they want us all to be friends again.

That’s legit all it takes.

If left and right wing media outlets would just start an initiative to bring the country together, everyone would fall in line. People only think what they are told to think.

The issue is that these corporations want money, and happiness doesn’t make money.

Lots of zombies out there.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Hitler became dictator only after he was sent and got out of jail. Lula in Brazil more recently was sent to jail and then got out and won a presidential election.

The Justice system coming after you feeds the Trumper's belief that the system is against him. Therefore he is anti-establishment therefore they must vote for him because there is a very strong anti-establishment movement right now.

It's why I think it was a very dangerous and potentially foolish decision to bring charges against him. We may be starting a chain of events that will get out of control.

[-] Shalakushka@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

You're right, we should just let Trump break as many laws as he wants because we are scared of his yokel supporters. That would be way better.

[-] grue@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

The error with Hitler wasn't sending him to prison, it was letting him out again after only a few months.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Well that's the issue with imprisoning popular political figures. All it takes is a tide to shift, a different party to come to power, and they may remove the popular figure from prison.

What if we imprison him and say DeSantis makes freeing Trump his main campaign promise? This type of thing can have unforeseen consequences. It's an unprecedented time.

[-] rynzcycle@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I think there is a bit of cherry picking in this. I don't think you're wrong that the charges will rile up his supporters, but plenty of dictators have taken power without going to jail.

The problem was already there, charges or not we were going to have to deal with a very violent mob, at least with charges filed we stand up for the moral value that all people (should be) are equal under the law.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I agree you don't need it but I think there's a certain zeitgeist going on right now and for example the last Brazilian president before Lula, Bolsonaro is also being prosecuted and they're trying to put him in jail.

These types of things are not normal in a stable and healthy democracy. We are teetering on the edge. I just hope Democrats can win this next election. I hate them with a passion but I think they can at least maintain the system functional for another 4 years.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Just never let the fuck head out and problem solved.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Therefore he is anti-establishment

Being a crime lord does not make anyone "anti-establishment". Bernie Sanders says Treason Trump is the most corrupt president in history. What matters is not a meaningless abstract word but whether the billionaire elites support your policies, and they love Treason Trump's tax cuts for the rich.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Of course but you try explaining that to the Trumpers. They won't believe you. They hear Trump say "witch hunt" and "hoax" so they're primed to believe it and then he tells them the government is against him.. they see the justice system going after them.. it almost becomes evidence for it. You see what I mean?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Like the name. Was just thinking of the wonderful comedian last night.

[-] relative_iterator@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 year ago

He’s not part of the party and never was. They let him come in and take over. It’s time for them to really up their language and actions against Trump rather than coddling him and his followers out of fear.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

That won't happen until long after he's dead. They'll prop him up as their golden calf until he can't speak anymore. Then like a light switch they'll have never supported him in the slightest and he was the evil man that took control of the GOP and made them look bad for 20 years.

[-] bizzle@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

Christ I hope Trump doesn't live another 12 years

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

He has access to better healthcare than 99% of the rest of us. Despite his best efforts I don't think we'll be rid of him anytime soon.

[-] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think he's going to flee America and do some sort of radio / online media message as a deposed ~~dictator~~ president . And continue to grift until he can't.

[-] shuzuko@midwest.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unless he has an "attack of conscience" and "commits suicide". Inside a guarded cell. Where he's being watched 24/7.

You know, the usual way.

Edit: honestly, I'm curious about the downvotes. Do people think I'm suggesting this is a thing that should happen? I think this would honestly be the worst possible result. And, call me a pessimist, but that's why I'm afraid of it happening. They'll be able to control him and his cult much better with him dead than alive.

[-] Im14abeer@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Ah, the ole Epstinearoo. A classic to be sure.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That won't happen as he may turn out to be more dangerous dead than alive.

You can stick him in prison and then people can forget about him but if he dies he becomes a martyr.

[-] shuzuko@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, I completely agree he will be far more dangerous dead than alive. Particularly because they won't struggle to control him anymore. I wasn't suggesting it should go that way... More suggesting that I can easily see it happening. On purpose. Specifically so that they can control the narrative.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You can stick him in prison and then people can forget about him but if he dies he becomes a martyr.

There is no scenario where Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump doesn't wind up with the same historical reputation as that of Benedict Arnold. His crimes were arguably bigger than Arnold's crimes.

[-] _errer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It might be closer to when he’s no longer a viable candidate. They turned on Bush practically before he was out of office

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Convicted Sex Offender Loser Trump will lose to Biden again by an even bigger margin, and then exhaust his criminal appeals, then go to jail for the rest of his life. The every GOP voter will suddenly claim they never really supported Convicted Sex Offender Loser Trump.

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Trump is 100% the Republican party of today. Maybe you could say he was an outsider in 2015 having little political experience but he is now the face of the party. He is leading in Iowa by 23 points and in national polls by an average of 37 points. Republicans courted the MAGA base for a long time and now that they have control of the party. The Republican party can no more excise Trump and his base than one could cut out their own heart and remain whole.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

No, I think we should let them continue tearing themselves apart

[-] grue@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Trump is a truer conservative than any Republican before him.

[-] TheDankHold@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Fantastic video from them as always. Love it when they dive into sources like this, gives very little room for conservatives to lie about the foundation of their ideology.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=E4CI2vk3ugk

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

They didn't let him come in and take over. There were 12 people running for the Republican primary in 2016, and that split the vote so much that Trump was able to get a plurality in most states. If it had been two or three candidates Trump may not have been able to win.

[-] letsalllovelain@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago

This is another example of how leniency for those who would make themselves king eventually leads to dictatorship. See you in another 5 years for the civil war.

[-] downpunxx@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Institutionalized racism, misogyny, homophobia, and white Christian separatism as party platform. No matter how "conservative" Republicans claimed to be, The Southern Strategy was the core value and singular driving force for the past 60 years. MAGA isn't a symptom, it's result

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

It's almost like you shouldn't have put your eggs all in one basket.

[-] JazzAlien@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Clown show.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

If the GOP actually does something, the only thing they can would be to kick him out of the GOP. However, if they do that, Trump will most likely form his own political party, and start attracting senators, governors, and house members to switch to his new party to give it legitimately.

I have been saying and I will keep on saying this, Trump is the modern day Hitler.

[-] rarely@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

To the surprise of absolutely no one.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

The only way to discourage this behavior is to help the other candidates make their pitch, which has to be why they are a better choice than Trump.

This should be how it works, the entire reason for the debate is that the attendees benefit from the attention.

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

But will conservatives even watch a debate that Trump isn't attending?

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They would need a miracle to pass him at this point.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
197 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS