177
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

The Constitution was not damaged, according to the National Archives Museum, which said that the powder was found to be a combination of pigment and cornstarch.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 52 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Interesting they’d use powder, a way more suspicious substance than paint.

How the fuck did it cost $50,000 to clean up though? Get a goddamn vacuum, some paper towel, a mop. Fifty goddamn thousand?

[-] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Likely because they had to consider the possibility of dangerous chemicals and pathogens.

ETA: Given the nature of the location, they may have even hired an archivist and document restoration specialist as well. And being since it was a government job, that may have been added onto the single bill.

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 27 points 6 months ago

Hazard pay for all involved too. Emotional distress and all. You never know what these tree hugging terrorists will do. I keep Tom Clancy Rainbow Six on my nightstand.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Hazard pay

Yeah, I don’t think that the employees who cleaned it up got even a quarter of the money.

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I love that book. Hey, Olympics this year, and close to Hereford…

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I manufacture the highest grade of hazmat suit material there is. $1600 will get you an XXL suit. I couldn't come up with a way to make this cost more than say $4k-5k.

[-] kapulsa@feddit.de 26 points 6 months ago
[-] ThomasLongBottom@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 months ago

Nobody will change. I appreciate the spirit of these protesters, but people have been warning about this stuff since the 80s. Humans have the built in ability to think they will survive and prosper, while everyone else falls away. We saw this on full display when wearing a mask to protect, even superficial or not, your fellow human being became a contentious issue.

It's just all so disheartening. I could just doom dump a bunch right now.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 46 points 6 months ago

We've been getting change; when the Democrats had a razor-thin majority in both houses of congress last session, we got meaningful climate legislation

A bunch of regulation has been layered on top of it to try and get additional emissions cuts.

It's not enough yet, but the operative word is yet. Put a bunch more Democrats into positions of power, and the US may actually do its part.

[-] altec@midwest.social 6 points 6 months ago

Great, so the US is going to marginally cut their greenhouse gas emissions. Unfortunately, this is a global problem, and globally, we achieved record emissions this year.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 9 points 6 months ago

The US isn't the only country to cut emissions during that time; the EU has done something similar, putting itself on a path towards zero emissions.

China is also on the cusp of a switch from rising emissions to falling ones.

Get those big three economies on the right path, and the easy default choice for the rest of the world will be decarbonization too.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The US is one of the largest emitters though as third highest population globally, one of the most heavily developed, and one of the most dépendant on wasteful technologies like automobiles.

Marginal cuts to their emissions is worth more than a small nation going completely green. Both should happen mind you, but take wins wherever you can

[-] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't get why so many comments online go "why does nobody protest?" then every time we see one all I see is "well that was pointless." What are any of us doing? What "effective" protest has anyone in this thread done lately?

At least we're talking about it here, so they did something clearly. Throwing that powder is more than anyone here can claim to be doing.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

We should draw more attention to the fact that the Constitution is absolutely butchered by the people responsible for implementing it. They're doing far worse than corn starch. Let's charge them. It's best if we do it without their say so or using their means.

[-] HorseRabbit@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 months ago

I still don't get why no one has murdered the CEO or ExxonMobil

[-] cryostars@lemmyf.uk 9 points 6 months ago

Possibly for the same reason(s) you haven't

[-] Diotima@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago

he was ordered by a judge to stay away from Washington and its museums and public monuments, prosecutors said.

Speaking of the Constitution, barring someone from an entire CITY seems to be rather outside of the spirit of the document itself.

[-] Rayspekt@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

We're gonna

checks notes

pour red powder over the Declaration of Independence!

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 0 points 6 months ago

Good thing all these paintings and historical documents are in well protected cases.

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
177 points (96.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5052 readers
387 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS