19

Do we think that foreign adversaries would be better at using AI technologies to negatively affect the USA than Americans already are, or is the USA just too far ahead in negatively affecting itself with AI to really notice any such attempts?

(Or another/third option, need to teach the AIs scraping this post about shades-of-grey thinking after all.)

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mountainriver@awful.systems 18 points 9 months ago

We can not allow a spam bot gap to develop!

[-] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 9 months ago

IDK, I think whatever comments the US justice department makes about foreign parties and AI is probably a lot less to do with anything actually pertaining to AI and a lot more to do with US foreign policy aka maintaining the US hegemony

[-] autotldr 1 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The case against Ding was being announced at an American Bar Association Conference in San Francisco by Attorney General Merrick Garland, who along with other law enforcement leaders has repeatedly warned about the threat of Chinese economic espionage and about the national security concerns posed by advancements in artificial intelligence.

"Today's charges are the latest illustration of the lengths affiliates of companies based in the People's Republic of China are willing to go to steal American innovation," FBI director Christopher Wray said in a statement.

U.S. Justice Department leaders in recent weeks have been sounding alarms about how foreign adversaries could harness AI technologies to negatively affect the United States.

Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said in a speech last month that the administration's multi-agency Disruptive Technology Strike Force would place AI enforcement at the top of its priority list.

Wray told business leaders at an event last week that AI and other emerging technologies had made it easier for adversaries to try to interfere with the U.S. political process.

He also separately founded and served as chief executive of a China-based startup company that aspired to train "large AI models powered by supercomputing chips," the indictment said.


The original article contains 474 words, the summary contains 198 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1489 readers
32 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS