549
submitted 8 months ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/steam@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] warm@kbin.earth 360 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Valve could reduce their cut honestly, perhaps some program for independent developers to help them get on their feet. I don't think the top games or big publishers should be getting cut reductions.

Either way, Valve haven't been buying out studios for exclusive games, so Epic and Sweeney can go fuck themselves, they are scum.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 119 points 8 months ago

At the same time it's not like Valve is not making use of the extra money to use it only for taking in profits. It might of been what made it possible to try entering the hardware market with VR and the Steam Deck and putting resources in trying to make Linux gaming for accessible for regular people. Might of been what allowed them to not be deterred after the failure of the Steam machine and Steam Controller.

[-] VelvetGentleman@lemmy.world 77 points 8 months ago

Might have, brother. Might have.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago

If I recall correctly valve did lower their cut in the wake of EGS having better terms for devs.

[-] warm@kbin.earth 49 points 8 months ago

For the first $10m earned it's 30%, then it's 25% until $50m, then it's 20% from then on.

load more comments (32 replies)
[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 40 points 8 months ago

I do think Valve could drop it to 25% and not lose much sleep over their coffers.

[-] Johanno@feddit.de 42 points 8 months ago

I mean I don't know how much money steam is banking, but they provide quite a good service for their share.

Max download rates at all times (almost).

Amazing steam overlay. Online gaming. Online saves. Workshop. Linux support.

And many more. Some of that epic has too but in comparison epic launcher is shit.

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

It would effectively not do anything for game devs to reduce it by 5%.

On the dev side steam provides distribution and a bunch of tools while you develop your game. Tomorrow you can pay 100$, and steam will support you with keys, releasing and publishing your game, reviewing it for free etc.

I have a game I've been developing for 5 years part time. I have steam keys I share with testers, and can distribute version for free, with all the patch notes and update features from steam for 100$.

When I do release, they'll have earned the 30%, and if I don't release I'll have saved a ton and steam will take the costs. This greatly reduces the barrier to self-publishing. Out of all the companies I deal with, this is by far the fairest and lest predatory model there is. Gaben could have just bled us of our money even more and it would have worked. They are very rich because they are very humble in a sense.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Safipok@lemmy.ml 27 points 8 months ago

The reason big studios get better rate is because they have leverage. Just as Amazon has leverage against apple in app store

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ozoned@lemmy.world 163 points 8 months ago

If scale is no longer an issue, why can't Epic create a store with similar functionality to steam? Because it's not about that. It's about Tim not being able to pocket as much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml 113 points 8 months ago
[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 138 points 8 months ago

Human rights principles? Tim needs to quit sniffing his own farts. He's trying to sell digital video games on iPhones, not end human trafficking.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago
[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 65 points 8 months ago

And in the same court case - it was discovered it was not profitable despite their more limited offerings.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 28 points 8 months ago

If the percentage was the most important part, why isn't every game on Epic?

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 23 points 8 months ago

discord i believe when they sold games only took like 10% cut. turns out, thats not all it takes to sell games, and its not like no one uses discord, so you couldn't even say people were avoiding the software as it is a popular platform.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 19 points 8 months ago

That's probably a big part of why Tim is angry

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 81 points 8 months ago

People hated Steam and were very skeptical initially. Respect was earned over time

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] acastcandream@beehaw.org 68 points 8 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] Switorik@lemmy.zip 72 points 8 months ago

Do you know why steam is dominating? There are no better alternatives. They actively work on projects that benefit everyone, including their competition.

For the time being, there's nothing to be said other than other companies need to stop being so shitty.

[-] Ashtefere@aussie.zone 68 points 8 months ago

Valve forever more have my support just because of proton. Letting me get off windows to game has been revolutionary for me.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 43 points 8 months ago

Yea, steam actually earned their market share through being a solid storefront and game distribution center and not because of exclusive releases from third parties or shady practices beyond promoting games.

Sure, they are the only place for valve games, but that is because those are their games. Yes, some of their games have loot boxes and that is all terrible, but that is the games and not inherent to steam.

[-] jaykay@lemmy.zip 37 points 8 months ago

It’s as if the recipe for success is not fucking over your customers and provide good product. Huh, weird

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 36 points 8 months ago

my problem is people conflate pro develper and pro consumer actions as the same thing, when they arent. what epic does is very pro developer(better cut, money in advance if exclusive), but the platform is far from being pro consumer(removes consumer choice in platform to buy it on, lower competiuon, inconplete community, store, workshop, and os functionality). I'm in open arms for competition, but it actively is a worse consumer experience, then its very hard to support.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago

Here's the difference. When we talk about companies dominating an industry, we're usually talking about practices that keep competition from even forming. Monopolies are formed as a result of big companies buying out or making it impossible for their competition.

Steam doesn't do that, which is a big reason they won their monopoly suit. They just provide a better model than anyone else is willing to, and they rake in the cash because of it.

Compare this situation to books-a-million in the states. Books-a-million doesn't have a monopoly on books, they just have created a better environment for selling them. They aren't stopping other book stores from opening or buying chains to shut them down, they just sell you a cup of coffee and give you a place to sit while you browse their massive selection.

That's not a monopoly, that's just better business.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] aport@programming.dev 34 points 8 months ago

Sweeney is a third-rate Carmack

[-] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 8 months ago

That's insulting to Carmarck considering how intelligent and talented the man is. Sweeney is a mediocre programmer and a hack businessman at best.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] ylai@lemmy.ml 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The “you mad bro” is found among internal Valve communication (Valve COO Scott Lynch to Erik Johnson and Newell, i.e. in the sense Johnson/Newell being “mad”, not Sweeney). It was particularly not sent out as a response to Sweeney. Another outlet already got tripped over this and had to make a correction: https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2024/03/valve-coo-on-epics-tim-sweeney-you-mad-bro-when-launching-the-epic-store/

This is not quite as sensational as some people are framing it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 31 points 8 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Less drama more context would be nice from headlines, but man does it feel like I'm asking too much

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
549 points (95.4% liked)

Steam

22 readers
40 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS